mount_unionfs(8)

2014-05-24 Thread Andrew Berg
What is the state of unionfs? There was apparently a big reimplementation of it that was merged in when 7 was -CURRENT, but there is absolutely no mention of this in the man page, which is dated November 30, 2006, and has a big scary warning: THIS FILE SYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ:

Re: docs/188786: Bug in inet(3) man page (inet_aton())

2014-05-24 Thread Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
On 05/23/2014 04:47 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Sorry it took me so long to reply. I had a lot of catching up to do after > BSDCan... > > On Sat, 17 May 2014, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > >> I think that what makes the page a little confusing is that it uses >> both ter

Re: mount_unionfs(8)

2014-05-24 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
No, it's not stable and it can easily make local DOS, even from jail, if user-mounts allowed. Until sych things are fixed, let's that scary text be there :) Regards, Alexander Yerenkow 24 мая 2014 г. 12:24 пользователь "Andrew Berg" < aberg...@my.hennepintech.edu> написал: > What is the state of

Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T

2014-05-24 Thread Tom Rhodes
On Fri, 23 May 2014 15:40:00 GMT Allan Jude wrote: > The following reply was made to PR docs/188214; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Allan Jude > To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, r...@tristatelogic.com, > Tom Rhodes > Cc: > Subject: Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what

Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T

2014-05-24 Thread Mark Linimon
The following reply was made to PR docs/188214; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 12:11:17 -0500 - Forwarded message from Tom Rhode

request: help updating TASKQUEUE(9)

2014-05-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, I've just added a new call to taskqueue - taskqueue_start_threads_pinned(). It's like taskqueue_start_threads(), but it takes a cpuid to pin the threads to. Would someone please help me with the manpage markup and wording? Thanks! -a ___ freebsd-

Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T

2014-05-24 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
The following reply was made to PR docs/188214; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Benjamin Kaduk To: Tom Rhodes Cc: Allan Jude , bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 17:42:47 -0400 (EDT) On Sat,

Re: request: help updating TASKQUEUE(9)

2014-05-24 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sat, 24 May 2014, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi, I've just added a new call to taskqueue - taskqueue_start_threads_pinned(). It's like taskqueue_start_threads(), but it takes a cpuid to pin the threads to. Would someone please help me with the manpage markup and wording? Something like this? -B

Re: request: help updating TASKQUEUE(9)

2014-05-24 Thread Adrian Chadd
Yup! Thanks! -a On 24 May 2014 15:02, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Sat, 24 May 2014, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've just added a new call to taskqueue - >> taskqueue_start_threads_pinned(). It's like taskqueue_start_threads(), >> but it takes a cpuid to pin the threads to. >> >> Would

Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T

2014-05-24 Thread Tom Rhodes
The following reply was made to PR docs/188214; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Rhodes To: Benjamin Kaduk Cc: trho...@freebsd.org, allanj...@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/188214: Manpage for fsck(8) doesn't say what happens when no -t or -T Date: Sun, 25 May 2014