Things are starting to move along for the Print Edition of the Handbook. The
goal is to have a publishable PDF to the Mall (and an epub/pdf to the
Foundation) by the end of the year. It may turn out that having Volume 1 ready
by end of year and Volume 2 by end of Q1/14 is more realistic.
I&#x
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Em 20-06-2013 19:03, Warren Block escreveu:
There is a complication. Links to sections which have been eliminated by
profiling will break, so those would also need profiling. I don't know how
big an issue that will be, but suspect it will not be v
Em 20-06-2013 19:03, Warren Block escreveu:
There is a complication. Links to sections which have been eliminated
by profiling will break, so those would also need profiling. I don't
know how big an issue that will be, but suspect it will not be very much.
Two proposed solutions:
1, The re
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Warren Block wrote
in :
wb> My proposal for merging the ISBN branch and getting out of our
wb> two-branch problem.
wb>
wb> First, profiling works. A demo file of the Porter's Handbook is here:
wb> http://wonkity.com/~wblock/profiledemo/
wb>
wb> After a
Em 20-06-2013 17:55, Hiroki Sato escreveu:
wb> After applying the patch, build either the online or print version of
wb> the book with:
wb>
wb> make EDITION=online clean book.html
wb> make EDITION=print clean book.html
wb>
wb> The "online" version includes all sections with edition="online"
Warren Block wrote
in :
wb> My proposal for merging the ISBN branch and getting out of our
wb> two-branch problem.
wb>
wb> First, profiling works. A demo file of the Porter's Handbook is here:
wb> http://wonkity.com/~wblock/profiledemo/
wb>
wb> After applying the patch, build either the online
all we need to mark are the online (non-print) sections. By
default, all sections would be for the print edition unless marked as
online.
(Difficulties: the default edition should be set in the Makefile, and
make needs to recognize that changing the EDITION setting means the
files need to be rebuilt.
e
ga> source solution now but imho, we should do it the next time.
I agree that preface and the pgpkey section can be different between
the online and print version, but are there other parts like them?
Probably few. Maybe the formatting conventions since I suspect they may
be different
Gabor Kovesdan wrote
in <51ab6d32.1060...@freebsd.org>:
ga> Em 02-06-2013 17:03, Warren Block escreveu:
ga> > That means "include elements marked with edition="print" and all
ga> > unprofiled elements"?
ga> Yes. In other words: exclude elements, whose edition is not print.
ga> >
ga> > For a pri
Em 02-06-2013 17:03, Warren Block escreveu:
That means "include elements marked with edition="print" and all
unprofiled elements"?
Yes. In other words: exclude elements, whose edition is not print.
For a print version, it might be easier to just go the opposite way:
leave everything unprofile
On 2 June 2013 17:03, Warren Block wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
>
>> Em 02-06-2013 15:56, Warren Block escreveu:
There's an XSLT stylesheet provided by DocBook that preprocesses the
markup and only leaves in the corresponding content. This is not enabled by
>>>
On Sun, 2 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Em 02-06-2013 00:13, Warren Block escreveu:
On Sat, 1 Jun 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Em 01-06-2013 20:52, Warren Block escreveu:
No objection from me, I just want to bring it up again that handling
these with a single-source solution would be nice,
12 matches
Mail list logo
