Anybody notice that this guy is sending a trojan as an attachment?
-Joe
On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 04:29:51AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>J nikogda ne pytalas% poznakomit%sJ v internete, no resilas% poprobyvat%. Zivu v
>Moskve, ucus%.
>Mne 19 let. Ne znaj, cego mn
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and
one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same
switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call the servers Box A, Box B, and Box C.
When i FTP data between B
On 05/06/2010 02:18 PM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and
one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same
switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and
one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same
switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call the servers Box A, Box B, and Box C.
When i FTP data between B
On 05/08/2010 05:08 AM, joe wrote:
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network
and one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the
same switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call the servers Box A, Box B
On 05/08/2010 05:54 AM, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Have you tried to disable TSO / LRO?
Fabien
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and one for
the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same switch.
All connections are
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and
one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same
switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call the servers Box A, Box B, and Box C.
When i FTP data between B
On 05/08/2010 06:55 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
I have just tried your suggeston and it has no effect for me ;(
Do you have another brand of NIC that you can try? At least that
will isolate whether it's igb(4) or something else.
Ian
--
Ian Freislich
I will grab a ne
On 05/08/2010 11:17 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
On 05/08/2010 06:55 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
I have just tried your suggeston and it has no effect for me ;(
Do you have another brand of NIC that you can try? At least that
will isolate whether it's igb(
AM, joe mailto:j...@hostedcontent.com>> wrote:
On 05/08/2010 11:17 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
On 05/08/2010 06:55 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
I have just tried your suggeston and it has
that environment.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:04 AM, joe mailto:j...@hostedcontent.com>> wrote:
On 05/08/2010 01:31 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
Looks like something to do with system C, you might isolate it,
and try
a back
to back connection with its N
On 05/08/2010 02:21 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
The cable, its a simple thing but make SURE you try that, a slightly
damaged one can do weird things and its quick to check, don't overlook
it.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, joe mailto:j...@hostedcontent.com>> wrote:
On 05/08
On 05/08/2010 02:21 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
The cable, its a simple thing but make SURE you try that, a slightly
damaged one can do weird things and its quick to check, don't overlook
it.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, joe mailto:j...@hostedcontent.com>> wrote:
On 05/08
Rui Paulo wrote:
On 2013/04/12, at 22:31, Scott Long wrote:
On Apr 12, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 2013/04/11, at 13:18, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Lack of maintainer in a near future would lead to bitrot due to changes
in other areas of network stack, kernel APIs, etc. This already
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 07:36:01 -0600
Jamie Gritton wrote:
On 05/18/13 05:43, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 01:14:23PM -0600, Jamie Gritton wrote:
I'm considering Alexander Leidinger's patch to make X11 work
inside a jail
(http://leidinger.net/Fre
ra
66GB waste (that's 37% waste!) would provide.
Your point about time storage is correct, however, I believe. Using
long instead of time_t is just asking for problems. There's probably
some hysterical raison for it.
... Joe
--
it, I'm keen to listen :)
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I am uncertain about the emulation issues, but I know my backup tar files
often exceed 4GB on x86 systems.
I have done this with versions FreeBSD 2.2.2-3.2. I have never heard it
mentioned before, so I assume it works on all versions. Probably a UFS
thing.
Joe Gleason
Tasam
> I am havin
in person. Particularly since
you seem to have more time and energy to spend posting to Usenet and
mailing lists than anyone else I know. ;-)
... Joe
---
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAI
o inform the soa
for freebsd.org (and factor in the freebsd.org TTLs to manage
the change).
In practice this will not work, and will cause 1/n cvsup attempts
to fail after a machine has been renumbered until TTLs expire.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
of likely servers, and store the relative time taken
to do so.
This should give you a relative performance metric between the servers
you measured, hopefully with local network performance variations
cancelled out by the fact that all tests are run around the same time.
Joe
To Unsubscri
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 02:17:54PM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 11:34 PM +1300 2000/1/22, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> > This should give you a relative performance metric between the servers
> > you measured, hopefully with local network performance variations
> > cancel
Ran into this quoting change problem too. It affects authname, authkey, and
phone
strings as well. Phone numbers with '*' sequences failed for me, as well my
authname and authkey settings (which contained non-alphanumerics). Encasing
these strings in "" worked for me.
Since your ISP is askin
gt; Thing.
One of us, at least, evidently.
How much mail does the use of the MAPS DUL reject?
How much of that do you think is worth rejecting?
Serious questions; just interested.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
ready been made :)
If I sound vague, it's because I am without a FreeBSD box right now,
and do not have an easy way to check the source tree.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
led to build a kernel.
Is that desirable? Or do we need more awk?
This is _not_ a loaded question :)
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
almost certainly more perl
speakers than awk speakers these days, so it probably makes sense
to do these things in perl rather than awk.
However, take care not to underestimate the awesome power of awk.
When you come down to it, there's an awful lot of userland that
(when you come down to
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 11:05:49PM +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 12:02:09PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > There is breakage in the new FICL. This fixes it...
> >
> > [awk diff]
>
> I remember a long time ago someone asked me to make some modific
r your efforts.
To those who _have_ experienced problems, remember this is a volunteer
effort. Would you flame someone on a public list if you found a bug
in the code they had contributed?
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
RS* it hadn't been fixed, yes.
No. It's a volunteer project. You don't flame people for bugs; you fix
them, submit polite reports or keep quiet.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
;bind to address nn.nn.nn.nn") for local use anyways.
Looks like the jail code will do something similar w/o source changes.
Oh well!
... Joe
-------
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAI
s. But that could also be
because the network environment is much more controlled internally.
... Joe
-------
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwauk
-l
16
Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the
machine.
... Joe
---
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milw
> At 08:51 AM 12/8/99 -0600, Joe Greco wrote:
> >Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the
> >machine.
>
> The info was provided more as a comparison, that quantity of routes do not
> necessary mean leak ? Or perhaps it does. But after 90
>
> :
> :At 1:26 PM -0600 1999/12/8, Joe Greco wrote:
> :
> :>> vmstat -m | grep routetbl|grep K
> :> routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
> :>16,32,64,128,256
> :>> netstat -rn | wc -l
> :>16
>
> P
To The Machine --
> Bob Vaughan | techie@{w6yx|tantivy}.stanford.edu | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>| P.O. Box 9792, Stanford, Ca 94309-9792
> -- I am Me, I am only Me, And no one else is Me, What could be simpler? --
>
--
... Joe
---
r repository to that version, we
s/var/etc/ presunably.
Joe
--
Ua lawa küpono ka hakahaka pä o këia pä malule
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
t after you have stepped
onto a plane to fly to a different country.
If one end thinks it is full-duplex and the other end thinks it is
half, then late collisions can occur which will not result in MAC-layer
retransmissions from the full-duplex-thinking station -- hence packet
loss.
Joe (possibly #
Problem report booting 4.0-RELEASE follows.
/boot.config: -P
Keyboard: yes
BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01
Console: internal video/keyboard
BIOS drive A: is disk0
BIOS drive C: is disk1
BIOS 639kB/56256kB available memory
FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 0.7
([EMAI
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 07:52:18AM +0100, Thierry.herbelot wrote:
> Joe Abley wrote:
> >
> > Problem report booting 4.0-RELEASE follows.
> >
> I had the exact same error message trying to boot from a floppy where I
> had tried to dd the full boot.flp (2,8 Megs is j
s BIND.
While it is fantastic that FreeBSD comes out of the box so fully
functional, it does make it a bit of a pain for those of us who intend
to build servers - we have to disable the original before installing a
new package. :-/
--
... Joe
---
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 05:21:24PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > While it is fantastic that FreeBSD comes out of the box so fully
> > functional, it does make it a bit of a pain for those of us who intend
> > to build servers - we have to disable the original before install
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > > In other words, if we're going to be replacing sendmail with an
> > > alternative MTA, I'd prefer postfix over qmail, and I believe I can
> > > marshall some pretty strong arguments for that posi
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > Uh, Chuck, can you tell me how many BIND and Sendmail advisories there have
> > been in the last five years?
> >
> > Wouldn't it be nice if we could just tell newbies, "hey, yeah, that Sendmail
> > has
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > Chuck,
> >
> > Please go back and read what I _wrote_. Your response assumes I made
>
> I've got your message, I quoted it fully in my first response. You asked
> to "Remove Sendmail from the base sy
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 05:21:24PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > Remove Sendmail from the base system - or, at least, make it a "package"
> > that is removable with the package management tool. Then be able to add
> > another mailer (or an updated Sendmail) i
l. Any ssh hackers looking at this, by any
chance?
--
... Joe
-------
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/342
question to
the -questions list. There are lots of helpful people there that will give
you ideas.
Oh -- also, check out Dan's list of NAT articles at
http://www.freebsddiary.org/topics.php3#nat
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
The big win with a journaling FS is when you have to reboot the system.
With Softupdates, you still have to fsck. On a large FS (say half a
terabyte) that can take hours.
With a JFS, you simply play the log forward and continue.
-joe
--
Joe McGuckin
ViaNet Communications
994 San Antonio
rgument to ccdinit (after cpaths, for
instance). Then, after ccdinit is done, simply free the ioctl copy of
vpp and you are done. It just seems like a lot of overhead carrying
around that malloc'd sc_vpp for no purpose. Unless, of course, you can
tell me the purpose for it!
> Truly yours
Joe Kelsey writes:
> Maxim Sobolev writes:
> > Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> > > Assignment:
> > >
> > > There is no reason for the NCCD constant to exist anymore.
> > >
> > > The CCD driver already has cloning suppor
ir files.
So far, they seem to have gotten the message, because I've only seen
one unauthorized file attempted upload this week. >:->
--
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance
However, most university sites mistakenly
perpetuated the nuucp service, mostly for administrative reasons.
That said, for max security it is always useful to have each site have
its own login, up to a point. Some large uucp sites used to use common
logins simply because there was so little securit
DB specs
because ATT would not release HDB to the community, in spite of pleas
from all of H, D, and B.
Of course, now it is all a moot point, and all of this is merely of
historical (hysterical?) interest.
/Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
op in /usr/src.
I'm running 4.4-RELEASE right now, and trying to go to -CURRENT. I did a
cvsup to get the source, and ran make buildworld
I just updated the source tree tonight. Should I wait to try again, or
am I doing something wrong?
I've got the complete make output in a fil
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 09:12:18PM -0600, Joe Halpin wrote:
> > I'm getting the following error when running 'make buildworld'
> >
> > perl
> >
>-I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/des/asm:/usr/
EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Mozilla-Status: 8001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
X-UIDL: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Is this just a normal
evice
entry
Dec 27 15:47:13 fbsd /kernel: umass0: detached
On my Linux box I just mount the device file and the camera shows up as
a filesystem. Is it different in FreeBSD?
Thanks
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
7;m pretty new to usb and haven't caught on yet. Is there a
document that describes what the device files under /dev are for? I
don't see da0s1 in my kernel config file at all.
Thanks
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I think they are getting close to a driver for the winmodem,
http://phantom.cris.net/freebsd/projects/viewproj.php?p_id=13
Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Reifenberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FreeBSD-Current" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday,
want.
Or, it could be a predefined package available for installation that
puts all of the compilers in the same place as the standard gcc/g++,
i.e., /usr instead of /usr/local.
/Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
David O'Brien writes:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:23:32PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> > It is plain that many people will want to be able to install a version
> > of gcc that is officially supported and that also includes *all* of the
> > standard platforms th
David O'Brien writes:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> > What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends
> > to provide at system build time? I thought that gcc was supposed to be
> > a modular compiler system,
David O'Brien writes:
Thank you, David, for taking the time to answer the questions. Your
answers were clear. I appreciate you taking the time to provide these
answers.
/Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Terry Lambert writes:
> I don't think Joe is debating; I think he wants to have a
> meta-discussion about what the problem space looks like,
> before submitting patches that light up his little corner,
> and dark up everything else.
Thank you, Terry. Maybe I need to brin
David O'Brien writes:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> > What is so hard about allowing someone to specify the list of frontends
> > to provide at system build time? I thought that gcc was supposed to be
> > a modular compiler system,
Terry Lambert writes:
> I don't think Joe is debating; I think he wants to have a
> meta-discussion about what the problem space looks like,
> before submitting patches that light up his little corner,
> and dark up everything else.
Thank you, Terry. Maybe I need to brin
e the attached.
Joe
--- lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c.orig Tue Feb 12 00:58:37 2002
+++ lib/libkvm/kvm_proc.c Tue Feb 12 01:14:40 2002
@@ -320,15 +320,18 @@
kp->ki_xstat = proc.p_xstat;
kp->ki_acflag = proc.p_acflag;
kp->ki_pctcpu = proc.p
Warner Losh writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joe Kelsey writes:
> : I also second Terry's comment about 0x800. There is no reason to add
> : yet more driver flags in order to "do the right thing". The "do the
> : right thing" case should al
umentation area
(section 4 pages? info docs? articles?)
/Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
as criticism of themselves, that is not my point,
and I am sorry that you take it as a personal critique.
Enough rampling for now.
/Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
t PAID for it. So, excuse me! I guess real programmers
only write documentation when they are PAID! Obviously, working on a
FREE product, you don't get paid so you don't document! After all, the
meaning is obvious from the code!
/Joe
p.s. I don't really have to supply sarcas
the other hand, if you put it in the rotate
mode, you probably aren't touching the mouse, so it shouldn't cause
problems.
How difficult is it to keep some sort of timer value in the code? If it
costs too much to get a timer, then a counter is probably sufficient.
/Joe
To Unsubscrib
ware taken from Usenet, so I think that /usr/local really started
with extensive use of Usenet distribution, which was coincident with
wide-spread use of BSD on VAXen.
As far as I remember, I never encountered the use of /opt until Solaris.
/Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
stinction between a port/package
and the official FreeBSD distributions.
/Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Joe Kelsey writes:
> When the BSD started, they tried to distinguish between /usr/local and
> /usr/public, but that never took hold. Certainly, when GNU
> distributions started, the FSF very quickly took up the then default
> (from the long history of standardized distribu
David O'Brien writes:
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 11:22:17AM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> > Basically, /usr/local is for anything the local administration wants to
> > officially support. The ports use of this (and by extension,
> > pre-compiled ports (packages)) is
Is this code included, or must it be patched in?
Is softupdates enabled by default or do I have to use a special
mount flag?
Thanks,
Joe
Joe McGuckin
ViaNet Communications
1235 Pear Ave, Suite 107
Mountain View, CA 90403
Phone: 650-969-2203
Cell: 415-710-4894
Fax: 650-969-2124
To
er had a problem with it. Just to confirm that amd is not hideously
broken beyond the point where _some_ people can use it just fine.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 02:28:20PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> I am planning on adding the Wide-DHCP client to src/contrib/ and
> src/sbin/ in a few days.
>
> I have it bmaked and ready go to. I have choosen the WIDE client because
> it is much smaller space-wise than the ISC client and its con
t for this
laptop, pointers would be appreciated.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
atures and there's nothing there
that seems needed for me.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
and fail stop semantics. They
also substantially impact system performance. If you want to
do performance measurement, benchmarking, and optimization,
you'll want to turn them off.
How do I turn them off?
Thanks,
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Current cvsupped at 1:15 PST on 1/12/03, I get the following
===> lib/libkvm
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a-DLIBC_SCCS -I/usr/src/lib/libkvm
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.c /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_i386.c
/usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_file.c /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_getloadavg.c
/usr/src/lib/libkvm
nd mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Myself and two others have seen this as well.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
(see below, my question got answered already)
Joe Laughlin wrote:
> Scott Long wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Once again it's my pleasure to announce Release Cadidate 3 of
> > FreeBSD 5.0. i386, pc98, alpha, ia64, and sparc64 releases are
> > availab
R=none" "PERL_CORE=1"
"LIBPERL_A=libperl.so" "LINKTYPE=static"
Writing Makefile for DynaLoader
==> Your Makefile has been rebuilt. <==
==> Please rerun the make command. <==
false
*** Error code 1
Rerunning make just make it die again in the same loc
-
acd0:at ata1 as master
acd1: MODE_SENSE_BIG command timeout - resetting
ata1: resetting devices ..
ata1: pre reset mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat2=08
acd0: ATAPI 14eb
acd1: ATAPI 14eb
ata1: after reset mask=03 stat0=00 stat1=00
ata1: devices=0c
--
J
t, but
my searching hasn't turned up anything that would explain this. Certainly
the manual page ought to be updated if this is a new expected behaviour or
something... at least some clue as to why it might fail would be helpful.
... JG
--
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI -
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Joe Greco wrote:
> > I've got a weirdness with kill(2).
> >
> > This code is out of Diablo, the news package, and has been working fine for
> > some years. It apparently works fine on other OS's.
> >
> > In the Diablo
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Joe Greco wrote:
> > The specific OS below is 5.1-RELEASE but apparently this happens on 4.8
> > as well.
>
> Could you confim this happens with 4.8? The access control checks there
> are substantially different, and I wouldn't expect the be
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Joe Greco wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Joe Greco wrote:
> > > > The specific OS below is 5.1-RELEASE but apparently this happens on 4.8
> > > > as well.
> > >
> > > Could you confim this happens with 4.8? T
On Fri, Apr 09, 1999 at 03:16:41AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "David O'Brien" writes:
> > I've only heard back from 4 folks about adding EGCS's g77 to the base
> > system -- all 4 said "yes". Unless I get more feedback, I will add g77
> > to the base system this weekend.
>
> I beg your
afety net"
category.
Now, if you'd LIKE the OS to provide a wonderful fantastic safety net, then
by all means, STFU and go write one.
I'm continually amazed at the fantastic improvements being introduced into
FreeBSD on a regular basis...
... Joe
------
Hi,
I've been trying to make buildworld on an aged Compaq DX2 (using newly-
supped CURRENT source) for about a week now, and (modulo the few egcs-looking
failures early on) I am now stuck with compilation failures in doscmd.
I have completely removed /usr/obj/* prior to starting, each time, and t
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 09:45:29PM -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote:
> Do you have an empty /usr/X11R6/include?
Ah, yes I do. Thanks for that :)
> The Makefile assumes you have the
> header files if the directory /usr/X11R6/include is present and tries to
> build the X version of doscmd. This assumption m
of the nice things about zebra is the way that each routing protocol
is neatly compartmentalised into a separate daemon. This makes it simple and
easy to maintain individual protocols (or add new ones) without jeopardising
others.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
OSPF has been around for a long time.
>
> But RIP is older, and was the first routing scheme.
X.25 is older than IP, which clearly makes it better in all circumstances.
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
It's 'open' as in an "open specifiaction". The algorithm was openly
published - unlike some other competing routing protocols.
Joe
Johan Granlund wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 28 Apr 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:29:16PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > < said:
> >
> > > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > > there difficulties that make this impossible?
> >
> > Yes, there are.
>
> Content-free answer. Please elaborate?
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
