Hi,
I had to install the e2fstools port before I could access my e2fs
partitions after installing -current. Thereafter everything has been
fine. No problems with the disk, etc. The only thing that is a problem
is if your e2fs partion(s) are mounted and your system crashes or the
mount is un
ot;do it right".)
Thanks,
Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Paul A. Mayer" writes:
Hi,
I had to install the e2fstools port before I could access my e2fs
partitions after installing -current. Thereafter everything has been
fine. No problems
linux in a dual boot
situation? ... Which is the real objective, (not playing with e2fs! ;.-)
/Paul
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Paul A. Mayer wrote:
I does printf, but it doesn't initiate the e2fsck. Using the ports
It prints essentially the same mount failure message
ncluded that in your kernel build?
/Paul
Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
Paul A. Mayer wrote:
I had to install the e2fstools port before I could access my e2fs
partitions after installing -current. Thereafter everything has been
fine. No problems with the disk, etc.
Hm, didn't know about this po
Hi Michael,
Regarding your linux clock issue:
There was a rather lively discussion at forums.gentoo.org about drastic
clock sync loss caused by KDE. I don't know if it has been resolved in
the 3.1 line, but if you were running linux KDE, you might take a look
at that as a cause for the linux
Hi folks,
I was so delighted to see that the shipping (iso) version RC3 didn't
crash immediately in ACPI thermal on my i845 based laptop! (I reported
this after installing RC1 in December and it reoccured with RC2.)
The problem comes back though if I compile a kernel myself after
CVSUP'ing ye
Hi,
I have a similar problem, i.e., a clean installation process for
5.0-RELEASE produces the error:
"Error Mounting /dev/acd0 on dist: Operation not supported by device (19)"
(I wound up doing a minimal ftp install and then did a binary upgrade
with the CD as the distribution medium.)
Nate s
Hi Rahul,
Well, it compiles on 5.0-Release-p1. The psm initialization gives some
specs about the device and some of it's features. ... but I don't see
any consequences of this in apps, like mozilla. And under gnome the
pressure sensitivity of the touchpad (e.g., tap to click) is now gone.
I
Hi,
Terry Lambert wrote:
"Paul A. Mayer" wrote:
You actually lose the tap/tap-tap click and doubleclick button
emulation with the new driver, and, as you note, the pressure
sensitivity.
Both of these issues were noted when the driver was posted for
review. It semed the consensus a
Hi,
Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
Paul A. Mayer said on Feb 10, 2003 at 11:01:45:
Hi Rahul,
Well, it compiles on 5.0-Release-p1. The psm initialization gives some
specs about the device and some of it's features. ... but I don't see
any consequences of this in apps, like mozilla.
Hmmm, fails to build for me:
FreeBSD asus 5.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p1 #3: Mon Feb 10
10:39:34 CET 2003 root@asus:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ASUS i386
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc32/work/build/gcc'
for d in libgcc; do \
if [ -d $d ]; then true; else /bin/sh
.././
H. I think that my 5.0R installation has self destructed.
Background:
* 60GB toshiba disk with two active OS partitions (win2k, freebsd)
booted with ranish
* Freebsd partition has 4 slices, swap (ca. 2GB), root (250MB), var
(250MB), usr (ca. 6GB), other msdosfs partitions are occassionally
#x27;m seeing seem
to be in short sequences or in proximity, but spread in various groups
with in the partitions. The /var fsck has resulted in clearing to the
last phase pass, where it repeatedly asks for fsck to be rerun. I'm on
/usr now.
/Paul
David Schultz wrote:
Thus spake P
Greetings,
Congratulations on RC1! I've found an issue! :-)
I just upgraded my ASUS LC3800 portable to 5.0-RC1 from 5.0-DP2. The
new kernel panics shortly after booting up and drops into the debugger.
The messages look something like this:
Fatal trap 12
Page fault in kernel mode fault virtua
14 matches
Mail list logo
