On Fri, 7 Jan 100, Darren Reed wrote:
> In some email I received from Steve Ames, sie wrote:
> >
> > *shudder* I really, really dislike the idea of -RELEASE actually being a
> > wide beta so that some code can get a workout. LAbel it beta and more people
> > will use it than currently do anyway.
human name makes it uncomfortable to communicate with you.
>
> If you would call you John Smith, or Thomas Jefferson if you want, you
could much more easily hide your (hideous?) precence in the lists. Please?
>
Yeah, like Mr. K. :)
> Leif
K
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTE
First of all, forgive me for being stupid, if that's what it turns out it
was, but I can't seem to get lint to work on -current (though it works
fine on -stable).
> lint -V pvselect.c
pvselect.c:
/usr/libexec/cpp -lang-c -undef -$ -C -Wcomment -D__FreeBSD__=4 -Dlint
-D__lint -D__lint__ -D__unix -
I figured out how to reproduce the ttywri hang at will (I'm sure there
are other ways, but this works for me 100%):
1) using SecureCRT and ssh2, ssh into your machine
2) run "find /"
3) click your mouse in the window and hold down. the scrolling will stop.
hold this down for a few seconds.
4) le
Why don't we use the download accelerator
(http://www.lidan.com/) methodology and make simultaneous connections to
the top 4 sites as discovered by ping? :)
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 5:23 PM -0800 2000/1/21, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>
> > You don't even need to modify the
what would be even cooler is if we could jail() a user natively at
login. I bet this patch could be easily modified to use jail() instead of
chroot().
On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <051001bf942c$87e3fa40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Alejandro Ramirez"
> writes:
> >Hi,
> >
