head -r338319 all_subdir_stand/i386/btx/btx use of -no-integrated-as and WITHOUT_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP= resulted in

2018-08-25 Thread Mark Millard
TILS_BOOTSTRAP= WITH_ELFTOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP= #WITH_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP= WITH_CLANG= WITH_CLANG_IS_CC= WITH_CLANG_FULL= WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS= WITH_LLD= WITH_LLD_IS_LD= WITHOUT_BINUTILS= WITH_LLVM_LIBUNWIND= WITH_LLDB= #PORTS_MODULES=emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions-nox11 #PORTS_MODULES=emulators/virtualbox

head's /usr/src/UPDATING vs. "LOADER_DEFAULT_INTERP, documented in build(7)": not documented yet

2018-08-26 Thread Mark Millard
ed that my long-in-use amd64 virtual-box context that I run and update FreeBSD in (under macOS) just automatically updated sufficiently via installkernel and installworld after building. (This assumes that all the changes are in the freebsd-ufs partition involved and that the freebsd-boot partition i

Re: head's /usr/src/UPDATING vs. "LOADER_DEFAULT_INTERP, documented in build(7)": not documented yet

2018-08-26 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Aug-26, at 12:35 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Mark Millard writes: >> But when I look at [...] the installed build(7) for head -r338319 I do >> not find any references to LOADER_DEFAULT_INTERP . > > It was added to build(7) in r338043: Thanks for the notes.

Re: redzone catching a buffer overflow in swapoff_one

2018-09-03 Thread Mark Millard
] #8 0x80fc0e5e at > amd64_syscall+0x29e > Sep 3 13:13:13 hbsd-dev-laptop kernel: [619] #9 0x80f9dc9d at > fast_syscall_common+0x101 See: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231116 for "Out of bounds memory access in bli

FYI: devel/kyua 14 failures for head -r338518M based build in a Pine64+ 2GB (aarch64 / cortexA53 / A64) context

2018-09-11 Thread Mark Millard
00:57:43 pine64 kernel: pid 44248 (exhaust_test), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) I'm not sure that they all would be expected. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@

Re: FYI: devel/kyua 14 failures for head -r338518M based build in a Pine64+ 2GB (aarch64 / cortexA53 / A64) context

2018-09-11 Thread Mark Millard
[Adding listing broken tests, but ignoring sys/cddl/zfs/ ones. lib/libc/string/memcmp_test:diff is one of them.] On 2018-Sep-11, at 2:44 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > [No zfs use, just a UFS e.MMC filesystem on a microsd adapter.] > > I got 14 failures. I've not enabled any

Re: FYI: devel/kyua 14 failures for head -r338518M based build in a Pine64+ 2GB (aarch64 / cortexA53 / A64) context [md related processes left waiting (and more)]

2018-09-11 Thread Mark Millard
[After the run top -CawSopid shows something interesting/odd: lots of g_eli[?] and md?? processes are still around in geli:w state for g_eli[?] and mdwait for md??. Also there are 4 processes in aiordy state.] On 2018-Sep-11, at 8:48 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > [Adding listing broken tests,

devd on head -r338675 on aarch64 (Pine64+ 2GB example) gets during booting: "sh: /usr/libexec/hyperv/hyperv_vfattach: not found"

2018-09-14 Thread Mark Millard
4/sys/GENERIC-NODBG arm64 aarch64 1200084 1200084 === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe,

Re: FYI: devel/kyua 14 failures for head -r338518M based build in a Pine64+ 2GB (aarch64 / cortexA53 / A64) context

2018-09-16 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Sep-16, at 2:25 AM, Piotr P. Stefaniak wrote: > On 2018-09-11 02:44:49, Mark Millard wrote: >> usr.bin/indent/functional_test:nsac -> failed: atf-check failed; see the >> output of the test for details [0.151s] >> usr.bin/indent/functional_test:sac ->

Re: FYI: devel/kyua 14 failures for head -r338518M based build in a Pine64+ 2GB (aarch64 / cortexA53 / A64) context

2018-09-16 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Sep-16, at 10:50 AM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 08:48:03AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> [Adding listing broken tests, but ignoring sys/cddl/zfs/ ones. >> lib/libc/string/memcmp_test:diff is one of them.] > >> ===> Brok

Re: FYI: devel/kyua 14 failures for head -r338518M based build in a Pine64+ 2GB (aarch64 / cortexA53 / A64) context

2018-09-16 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Sep-16, at 1:50 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 01:21:33PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> On 2018-Sep-16, at 10:50 AM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: > >>> On another note, the comment just below that, > >>> /* But we need to z

Re: Some delete-old detrius

2018-09-18 Thread Mark Millard
libibverbs.so.1 OLD_LIBS+=usr/lib/libmlx5.so.1 OLD_LIBS+=usr/lib/libibverbs.so.1 END QUOTE This was after having the nsac and sac kyua tests report failures in my environment, long after they should have not existed. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar

Re: Some delete-old detrius

2018-09-19 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Sep-19, at 9:14 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: > On 9/18/18 8:48 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> A problem here is that the references should be to usr.bin instead >> of usr/bin . See: >> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2018-September/118426.html &

Use of cbp->tbd[-1].tb_size in /usr/src/sys/dev/fxp/if_fxp.c : clang 7 rejects it

2018-09-20 Thread Mark Millard
NTXSEG + 1]; ^ 1 error generated. *** [if_fxp.o] Error code 1 It does look odd to me. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.or

building head -r338675 with devel/amd64-gcc: /usr/local/x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.0/bin/ld: warning: -z ifunc-noplt ignored

2018-09-20 Thread Mark Millard
using what is built? === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "

aarch64 head -r338921 vs. man ld vs. ld -v : man ld describes GNU when ld is lld

2018-09-24 Thread Mark Millard
a53+crypto ACFLAGS.aesv8-armx.S+= -mcpu=cortex-a53+crypto ACFLAGS.ghashv8-armx.S+=-mcpu=cortex-a53+crypto # more ~/src.configs/make.conf CFLAGS.gcc+= -v LDFLAGS.lld+= -Wl,--no-threads === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___

sbin/fsck_ffs/pass5.c: "CG %d: BAD CHECK-HASH %#x vs %#x" is missing \n

2018-10-01 Thread Mark Millard
LVAGE? [yn] y === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-c

head -r339076 based powerpc64 context: fatal kernel trap Stopped at lock_init+0x78 stw r9,0x8(r3)

2018-10-17 Thread Mark Millard
.0-ALPHA8 #4 r339076M: Mon Oct 15 13:19:35 PDT 2018 markmi@FBSDG5L:/usr/obj/powerpc64vtsc_xtoolchain-gcc/powerpc.powerpc64/usr/src/powerpc.powerpc64/sys/GENERIC64vtsc-NODBG powerpc powerpc64 1200084 1200084 ports was at -r480180. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away i

Re: head -r339076 based powerpc64 context: fatal kernel trap [ during /usr/tests/Kyuafile's sys/netipsec/tunnel/aes_cbc_128_hmac_sha1:v4 ]

2018-10-17 Thread Mark Millard
[I got another data storage interrupt failure, again during kyaua showing: sys/netipsec/tunnel/aes_cbc_128_hmac_sha1:v4 -> but the backtrace looks different. See below.] On 2018-Oct-17, at 4:58 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > On a powerpc64 with builworld buildkernel built via > devel/

Re: head -r339076 based powerpc64 context: fatal kernel trap [ during /usr/tests/Kyuafile's sys/netipsec/tunnel/aes_cbc_128_hmac_sha1:v4 ]

2018-10-17 Thread Mark Millard
[Booting a debug kernel reported a lock order reversal that might be relevant. The problem repeated again: seems to always fail in my context. The backtrace is like the prior one, but for the debug kernel build being used this time.] On 2018-Oct-17, at 6:29 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > [I

Expected?: "failed: Miscompare for aalgo=hmac/sha1 ealgo=camellia-cb" 12.0-ALPHA10 kernel with pre-openssl update -r339076 head?

2018-10-18 Thread Mark Millard
e in this odd context expected/reasonable? Should I ignore it? (I have no reason to normally run such a odd mix of vintages of world vs. kernel materials. I'm just checking if the crashing is somehow specific to my builds or not.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away

Re: Expected?: "failed: Miscompare for aalgo=hmac/sha1 ealgo=camellia-cb" 12.0-ALPHA10 kernel with pre-openssl update -r339076 head?

2018-10-18 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Oct-18, at 12:12 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > As part of helping to track down a powerpc64 system > crash when "kyua test -k /usr/tests/Kyuafile" is run > I substituted into a -r339076 context official kernel > materials from: > > https://download.freeb

head -r338804 boots threadripper 1950X fine; head -r338810+ do not; -r338807 seems implicated

2018-10-20 Thread Mark Millard
88810 would be unlikely contributors. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any m

Re: head -r338804 boots threadripper 1950X fine; head -r338810+ do not; -r338807 seems implicated

2018-10-20 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Oct-20, at 1:39 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > I attempted to jump from head -r334014 to -r339076 > on a threadripper 1950X board and the boot fails. > This is both native booting and under Hyper-V, > same machine and root file system in both cases. I did my investigation u

head -r339076's boot loader fails to boot threadripper 1950X system (BTX halted); an earlier version works

2018-10-20 Thread Mark Millard
e board is a GIGABYTE X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (rev 1.0). It has 96 GiBytes of ECC RAM, just 6 DIMMs installed. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.f

Re: head -r339076's boot loader fails to boot threadripper 1950X system (BTX halted); an earlier version works

2018-10-20 Thread Mark Millard
[Adding some vintage information for a loader that allowed a native boot.] On 2018-Oct-20, at 4:00 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > I attempted to jump from head -r334014 to -r339076 > on a threadripper 1950X board and the native > FreeBSD boot failed very early. (Hyper-V use of > the sa

Re: head -r339076's boot loader fails to boot threadripper 1950X system (BTX halted); an earlier version works [ -r336532 broke it ]

2018-10-21 Thread Mark Millard
[I found what change lead to the 1950X boot crashing with BTX halted.] On 2018-Oct-20, at 12:44 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > [Adding some vintage information for a loader > that allowed a native boot.] > > On 2018-Oct-20, at 4:00 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > >> I attemp

Re: head -r339076's boot loader fails to boot threadripper 1950X system (BTX halted); an earlier version works [ -r336532 broke it ]

2018-10-21 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Oct-20, at 10:32 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:04 PM Mark Millard wrote: > [I found what change lead to the 1950X boot crashing > with BTX halted.] > >> On 2018-Oct-20, at 12:44 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> > [Adding some

Re: head -r339076's boot loader fails to boot threadripper 1950X system (BTX halted); an earlier version works [ WITHOUT_ZFS= fixes it ]

2018-10-21 Thread Mark Millard
[Building and installing based on WITHOUT_ZFS= allows the resulting loader to work correctly on the 1950X.] On 2018-Oct-21, at 12:05 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2018-Oct-20, at 10:32 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 11:04 PM Mark Millard wrote: >> [I

Re: head -r338804 boots threadripper 1950X fine; head -r338810+ do not; -r338807 seems implicated

2018-10-21 Thread Mark Millard
[I built based on WITHOUT_ZFS= for other reasons. But, after installing the build, Hyper-V based boots are working.] On 2018-Oct-20, at 2:09 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2018-Oct-20, at 1:39 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > >> I attempted to jump from head -r334014 to -r339076 >>

Re: head -r338804 boots threadripper 1950X fine; head -r338810+ do not; -r338807 seems implicated

2018-10-21 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Oct-21, at 8:30 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 9:28 PM Warner Losh wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:57 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-stable > wrote: >> [I built based on WITHOUT_ZFS= for other reasons. But, >> after installing the build,

Re: head -r338804 boots threadripper 1950X fine; head -r338810+ do not; -r338807 seems implicated

2018-10-22 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Oct-22, at 2:27 AM, Toomas Soome wrote: > >> On 22 Oct 2018, at 06:30, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 9:28 PM Warner Losh wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 8:57 PM Mark Millard via freebsd-stable

Re: head -r338804 boots threadripper 1950X fine; head -r338810+ do not; -r338807 seems implicated

2018-10-22 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Oct-22, at 4:07 AM, Toomas Soome wrote: > On 22 Oct 2018, at 13:58, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> On 2018-Oct-22, at 2:27 AM, Toomas Soome wrote: >>> >>>> On 22 Oct 2018, at 06:30, Warner Losh wrote: >>>> >>

Re: head -r338804 boots threadripper 1950X fine; head -r338810+ do not; -r338807 seems implicated

2018-10-22 Thread Mark Millard
[I will note the the loader problem has been shown to not be involved in the kernel problem that this "Subject:" was originally for.] On 2018-Oct-22, at 9:26 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 6:39 AM Mark Millard wrote: >> On 2018-Oct-22, at 4:07 AM,

Re: head -r338804 boots threadripper 1950X fine; head -r338810+ do not; -r338807 seems implicated

2018-10-22 Thread Mark Millard
[I' unable to reproduce the under-Hyper-V early kernel crash for WITH_ZFS= (implicit) build that includes the for-loaders patch I was given to try.] On 2018-Oct-22, at 10:01 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > [I will note the the loader problem has been shown to > not be involved in the ker

head -r340287 's /usr/src/Makefile.libcompat still lists various LIB32CPUFLAGS= -target *-unknown-freebsd12.0 (not 13.0)

2018-11-09 Thread Mark Millard
nknown-freebsd13.0 .endif .endif LIB32CPUFLAGS+= -mabi=32 === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To uns

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X based on head -r340287: sysctl dev.cpu: 0-30 but no 31? (top shows all 31 "CPU"s)

2018-11-17 Thread Mark Millard
user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To

Re: Ryzen Threadripper 1950X based on head -r340287: sysctl dev.cpu: 0-30 but no 31? (top shows all 0-31 "CPU"s) [subject corrected]

2018-11-17 Thread Mark Millard
[Fixing dumb, confusing subject typo. No change below.] On 2018-Nov-17, at 12:54, Mark Millard wrote: > For some reason there is no .dev.cpu.31 listed for the 1950X that > I use. This is a native boot, not use under Hyper-V. For > illustration I list: > > # sysctl dev.c

Re: maxswzone NOT used correctly and defaults incorrect?

2018-11-24 Thread Mark Millard
ed amount" figure, different by very roughly a factor of 2 if I remember right, neither near what the documentation suggests. Suggesting a fixed ratio to RAM-size just seems to be wrong. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) _

head -r341836 (jump to clang 7): amd64 -> armv7 cross build failed: ld: error: unable to find library -lh_csu

2018-12-11 Thread Mark Millard
/armv7_clang/arm.armv7/usr/src/arm.armv7/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/obj/armv7_clang/arm.armv7/usr/src/arm.armv7/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/armv7_clang/arm.armv7/usr/src/arm.armv7/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/armv7_clang/arm.armv7/usr/src/arm.armv7/tmp/legacy/bin::/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin' SRCTOP='/u

Re: head -r341836 (jump to clang 7): amd64 -> armv7 cross build failed: ld: error: unable to find library -lh_csu

2018-12-12 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Dec-11, at 17:27, Mark Millard wrote: > [This was after amd64 updating to -r341836 successfully ( from -r341766 ). > The below was a meta-mode cross build, also going from -r341766 to > -r341836 .] > > # > ~/sys_build_scripts.amd64-host/make_armv7_nodebug_cla

FreeBSD head -r341836 amd64->aarch64 cross-build of -r484783 ports via poudriere: devel/qt5-testlib hung-up during "Checking for POSIX monotonic clock"

2018-12-19 Thread Mark Millard
.0-CURRENT #5 r341836M: Tue Dec 11 16:37:42 PST 2018 markmi@FBSDFSSD:/usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC-NODBG amd64 amd64 135 135 # svnlite info /usr/ports/ | grep "Re[plv]" Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repos

Re: FreeBSD head -r341836 amd64->aarch64 cross-build of -r484783 ports via poudriere: devel/qt5-testlib hung-up during "Checking for POSIX monotonic clock"

2018-12-19 Thread Mark Millard
[Looks like a race or some such for devel/qt5-testlib: retry of poudreire-devel did not hang. The other hang-up seems to be repeating and I give some details.] On 2018-Dec-19, at 12:20, Mark Millard wrote: > FYI: Based on FreeBSD head -r341836 (host and target) and ports -r484783 . >

Re: FreeBSD head -r341836 amd64->aarch64 cross-build of -r484783 ports via poudriere: devel/qt5-testlib hung-up during "Checking for POSIX monotonic clock"

2018-12-19 Thread Mark Millard
[I attached to the hung-up process with gdb and looked around a little.] On 2018-Dec-19, at 13:58, Mark Millard wrote: > [Looks like a race or some such for devel/qt5-testlib: retry of > poudreire-devel > did not hang. The other hang-up seems to be repeating and I give some

Re: FreeBSD head -r341836 amd64->aarch64 cross-build of -r484783 ports via poudriere: devel/qt5-testlib hung-up during "Checking for POSIX monotonic clock"

2018-12-20 Thread Mark Millard
[A amd64->armv7 cross build shows interesting hang-up behavior as well, apparently highly repeatable for my current context.] On 2018-Dec-19, at 16:21, Mark Millard wrote: > [I attached to the hung-up process with gdb and looked around a little.] > > On 2018-Dec-19, at 13:58,

A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved)

2018-12-21 Thread Mark Millard
-up at the same point. Building anything that requires multimedia/gstreamer1-qt@qt5 seems to be solidly blocked in my environment. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailin

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved)

2018-12-22 Thread Mark Millard
lready, building just multimedia/gstreamer1-qt@qt5 still gets the hang-up at the same point. Building anything that requires multimedia/gstreamer1-qt@qt5 seems to be solidly blocked in my environment. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 20

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved)

2018-12-22 Thread Mark Millard
[I found my E-mail records reporting successful builds using qemu-user-static from ports head -r484783 under FreeBSD head -r340287.] On 2018-Dec-22, at 00:10, Mark Millard wrote: > [I messed up the freebsd-emulation email address the first time I sent > this. I also forgot to indicate th

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved)

2018-12-23 Thread Mark Millard
[I built a FreeBSD head -r340288 context and tried ports head -r484783 and the problem repeated.] On 2018-Dec-22, at 12:55, Mark Millard wrote: > [I found my E-mail records reporting successful builds using > qemu-user-static from ports head -r484783 under FreeBSD > head -r340287.] >

head -r3418363: top -opid process list order is rather odd (top -Saopid example shown)

2018-12-24 Thread Mark Millard
hcp 1 20012M 484K select 1 0:00 0.00% dhclient: awg0 (dhclient) (Basically the Pine64+ 2GB [aarch64] above was idle after boot other than some runs of top.) I see this oddity across architectures, for example amd64, powerpc64, aarch64, armv7. === Mark Millard marklmi

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved)

2018-12-24 Thread Mark Millard
[A native poudreire-devel based build of multimedia/gstreamer1-qt@qt5 did not hang-up and worked fine. Official package build history also provides some evidence.] On 2018-Dec-22, at 12:55, Mark Millard wrote: > [I found my E-mail records reporting successful builds using > qemu-user-

Re: head -r3418363: top -opid process list order is rather odd (top -Saopid example shown)

2018-12-24 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Dec-24, at 13:49, Yuri Pankov wrote: > Mark Millard wrote: >> From my from=source head -r3418363 context, top with -opid does not >> seem to sort in a coherent order, not time of process creation order >> (either direction) and not in just-PID numeric order (eith

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved)

2018-12-28 Thread Mark Millard
() from /lib/libc.so.7 (gdb) bt #0 0xf4e5e0dc in _ppoll () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1 0x00033bf0 in SubprocessSet::DoWork (this=) at src/subprocess-posix.cc:237 Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in e

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved)

2018-12-28 Thread Mark Millard
en when using head. (The kernel does have symbols.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscrib

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved)

2018-12-28 Thread Mark Millard
[Using ktrace/kdump shows an apperent oddity in the kevent use that hang-up in cmake, not that I know it causes the hang-up.] On 2018-Dec-28, at 00:16, Mark Millard wrote: > [The historical notes are removed and replaced by partial trace > information from example hang-ups, not tha

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved)

2018-12-29 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Dec-28, at 12:12, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2018-Dec-28, at 05:13, Michal Meloun wrote: > >> Mark, >> this is known problem with qemu-user-static. >> Emulation of every single interruptible syscall is broken by design (it >> have signal related races).

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved) [details of a specific qemu-arm-static source code problem]

2018-12-30 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Dec-28, at 12:12, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2018-Dec-28, at 05:13, Michal Meloun wrote: > >> Mark, >> this is known problem with qemu-user-static. >> Emulation of every single interruptible syscall is broken by design (it >> have signal related races).

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved) [details of a specific qemu-arm-static source code problem]

2018-12-30 Thread Mark Millard
[Removing __packed did make the size and offsets match armv7 and the build worked based on the reconstructed qemu-arm-static.] On 2018-Dec-30, at 16:38, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2018-Dec-28, at 12:12, Mark Millard wrote: > >> On 2018-Dec-28, at 05:13, Michal Meloun wrote:

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved) [details of a specific qemu-arm-static source code problem]

2018-12-31 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Dec-30, at 21:01, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 14:34, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > wrote: >> >> [Removing __packed did make the size and offsets match armv7 >> and the build worked based on the reconstructed qemu-arm-static.] > > Than

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved) [details of a specific qemu-arm-static source code problem]

2018-12-31 Thread Mark Millard
On 2018-Dec-31, at 10:16, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 21:05, Mark Millard wrote: > [...] >> But if you have a form of hang-up that shows no sign of being tied >> to kevent or hangs-up only sometimes, I'd be surprised if the __packed >> change(s) w

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved) [details of a specific qemu-arm-static source code problem]

2018-12-31 Thread Mark Millard
[I listed my /usr/src svn veriosn information instead of /usr/ports . Correcting. . .] On 2018-Dec-31, at 12:05, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2018-Dec-31, at 10:16, Jonathan Chen wrote: > >> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 21:05, Mark Millard wrote: >> [...] >>> But if you

Re: A reliable port cross-build failure (hangup) in my context (amd64->armv7 cross build, with native-tool speedup involved)

2019-01-04 Thread Mark Millard
On 2019-Jan-3, at 22:56, Michal Meloun wrote: > On 29.12.2018 18:47, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> On 12/28/18 9:56 PM, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: >>> >>> On 2018-Dec-28, at 12:12, Mark Millard wrote: >>> >>>> On 2018-Dec-28, at 05

Re: r343917 fails into single-user mode at boot - new clang related issue?

2019-02-09 Thread Mark Millard
349250) (based on LLVM 7.0.1) Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd13.0 Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/bin I'd not expect clang vintage to be the issue. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-cur

Re: What is evdev and autoloading?

2019-02-17 Thread Mark Millard
the default driver on the major Linux distributions. . . . but it seems to not have a 13-current entry. It does have a 12.0-RELEASE entry. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd

Re: What is evdev and autoloading?

2019-02-18 Thread Mark Millard
On 2019-Feb-17, at 18:35, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 03:04:41PM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2019-Feb-17, at 10:03, Steve Kargl >>> wrote: >>> >>> Anyone have insight into what evdev is? The

amd64 head -r349794 (under Hyper-V): "panic: spin lock held too long" during a buildworld buildkernel

2019-07-06 Thread Mark Millard
Features=0x1783fbff Features2=0xfed83203 AMD Features=0x2e500800 AMD Features2=0x4003f3 Structured Extended Features=0x209c01a9 XSAVE Features=0xf AMD Extended Feature Extensions ID EBX=0x2001004 Hypervisor: Origin = "Microsoft Hv" . . . === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( d

head -e350364 amd64 update lib32 part-of-build: lib/libpjdlog__L got: ld: error: unable to find library -lgcc_s

2019-07-26 Thread Mark Millard
/src/share/mk/bsd.confs.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.files.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.dirs.mk /usr/src/share/ mk/bsd.incs.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.links.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.dep.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.clang-analyze.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.obj.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk /usr/src/share/

Re: head -e350364 amd64 update lib32 part-of-build: lib/libpjdlog__L got: ld: error: unable to find library -lgcc_s

2019-07-26 Thread Mark Millard
On 2019-Jul-26, at 18:35, Mark Millard wrote: > This was an attempted self-hosted update from -r350300 to > -r350364 . The lib32 part of buildworld got: That -r350300 should have been: -r350255 . Apparently, this was a build-race that I've not seen in some time: Simply starting a

head -r351056 self-hosted amd64 installworld fails with: "don't know how to make _testsDATA_FILESINS1_data/md5test-in. Stop"

2019-08-14 Thread Mark Millard
5test-in. Stop make[7]: stopped in /usr/src/lib/libc/tests/hash *** Error code 2 The original context was -r350364 . === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing li

svn commit: r351100 - head/sys/dev/iicbus/twsi looks to be missing (uintmax_t) cast

2019-08-15 Thread Mark Millard
A textually small nit for r351100 is that %ju normally goes with a (uintmax_t) cast, so more like: debugf(sc->dev, "Bus clock is at %ju\n", (uintmax_t)clk); %ju need not match up with uint64_t from: uint64_t clk; === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went

head -r351102 amd64 rebuilding itself but via devel/xtoolchain-llvm90 ( rc2: ports head -r509054 ) fails for boot2.out: ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __ashldi3

2019-08-15 Thread Mark Millard
dir.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk' .PATH='. /usr/src/stand/i386/boot2' 1 error FYI: # uname -apKU FreeBSD FBSDFHUGE 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #29 r351102M: Thu Aug 15 14:22:00 PDT 2019 markmi@FBSDFHUGE:/usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/GENERIC-N

head -r351153 amd64 upgrade installworld failure: realinstall_subdir_stand got: 'sh: cc: not found' (a race?)

2019-08-16 Thread Mark Millard
--- realinstall_subdir_tests --- . . . --- realinstall_subdir_stand --- sh: cc: not found Repeating buildworld buildkernel and then trying installworld (without the -j28 I had used originally) completed. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar

amd64 head -r351153 self-built but via devel/llvm90: 'objcopy: elf_update() failed: Layout constraint violation' for gptboot.bin

2019-08-16 Thread Mark Millard
src/share/mk/bsd.clang-analyze.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.obj.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.subdir.mk /usr/src/share/mk/bsd.sys.mk' .PATH='. /usr/src/stand/i386/gptboot /usr/src/stand/i386/boot2 /usr/src/stand/i386/common /usr/src/stand/libsa' 1 error === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.c

"cpuset -n prefer:?" --what values for "?" are supposed to be allowed? (only 1 is, despite two numa domains)

2019-09-10 Thread Mark Millard
ns to have been run in a Windows 10 Pro HyperV session, instead of in a native-boot of the same media. (A native-boot would have had 32 CPUs.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@freebs

Re: "cpuset -n prefer:?" --what values for "?" are supposed to be allowed? (only 1 is, despite two numa domains)

2019-09-11 Thread Mark Millard
On 2019-Sep-11, at 07:31, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:58:05PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> In a context with: >> >> # cpuset -g >> pid -1 mask: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, >> 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23

Re: "cpuset -n prefer:?" --what values for "?" are supposed to be allowed? (only 1 is, despite two numa domains)

2019-09-11 Thread Mark Millard
On 2019-Sep-11, at 08:15, Mark Johnston wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 07:57:26AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> >> On 2019-Sep-11, at 07:31, Mark Johnston wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:58:05PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >>&g

Re: "cpuset -n prefer:?" --what values for "?" are supposed to be allowed? (only 1 is, despite two numa domains)

2019-09-11 Thread Mark Millard
On 2019-Sep-11, at 10:11, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2019-Sep-11, at 08:15, Mark Johnston wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 07:57:26AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2019-Sep-11, at 07:31, Mark Johnston wrote: >>> >>>

Re: spurious out of swap kills

2019-09-13 Thread Mark Millard
ard computer investigations that lead to my learning about vm.pageout_oom_seq .) If more or different configuration/tuning is required, I'm going to eventually want to learn about it as well. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___

Re: spurious out of swap kills

2019-09-13 Thread Mark Millard
messages? (It used to be that the system simply leaves the dirty pages in memory when a swap_pager_getswapspace failed message is produced. Of itself, it did not cause a kill. I do not know about now.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) __

head -r352274 buildkernel targetting armv7 failure: am335x/am335x_dmtpps.c:304:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'spinlock_enter' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]

2019-09-14 Thread Mark Millard
/sys/sys/mutex.h:258:2: note: expanded from macro '__mtx_lock_spin' spinlock_enter(); \ ^ . . . (spinlock_enter was not the only example.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freebsd-current@free

Re: head -r352274 buildkernel targetting armv7 failure: am335x/am335x_dmtpps.c:304:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'spinlock_enter' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaratio

2019-09-14 Thread Mark Millard
On 2019-Sep-14, at 11:21, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Sat, 2019-09-14 at 11:05 -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: >> After updating my amd64 context to head -r352274, >> attempting an amd64->armv7 cross buildworld buildkernel >> ended up failing with: >&g

Re: spurious out of swap kills

2019-09-14 Thread Mark Millard
causing crappy down-stream effects. You can use the I/O scheduler to limit the write rates at the low end. You might also be able to schedule a lower write queue depth at the top end as well, but I've not seen good ways to do that. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only

Re: Reverting -current by date.

2019-11-20 Thread Mark Millard
ormation for earlier offerings. Snapshots are not vetted as far as I know --and sometimes do not boot in contexts that I've tried. This applies both to artifact.ci.freebsd.org materials and the announced snapshots put under https://download.freebsd.org/ftp/snapshots/ . === Mark M

Re: Reverting -current by date.

2019-11-20 Thread Mark Millard
On 2019-Nov-20, at 14:28, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 11/20/19 1:51 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> Bob P. wrote for an aarch64 context: >> >>> From time to time it would be handy to revert freebsd-current to >>> an older, well-behaved revision. >>>

head r354975 and/or later broke ci.freebsd.org's FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc builds in tests/sys/sys/bitstring_test.c 's atfu_bit_ffs_area_body

2019-11-22 Thread Mark Millard
ts) = {}; 21:21:52 ^~~~ 21:21:52 *** [bitstring_test.o] Error code 1 But, as of when I looked, none of the FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc build attempts have completed since then. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___ freeb

head r355027 fails to (non-debug) build for: sys/arm/broadcom/bcm2835/bcm2835_sdhci.c:721:26: error: unused variable 'sc

2019-11-23 Thread Mark Millard
only used in: KASSERT(sc->dmamap_seg_count == 0, ("data pending interrupt pushed through SDHCI framework")); and this was a non-debug build: so the KASSERT did not use sc either. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net w

head -r355027 context, poudiere jail constructions with the likes of -a arm64.aarch64 -x : awk: can't open file /sys/param.h

2019-11-23 Thread Mark Millard
/os-release was established, possibly via the distrib-dirs distribution DB_FROM_SRC=1 use involved in (re-)constructing /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-cortexA53-installworld-poud/ . === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) ___

Re: head -r355027 context, poudiere jail constructions with the likes of -a arm64.aarch64 -x : awk: can't open file /sys/param.h

2019-11-24 Thread Mark Millard
On 2019-Nov-24, at 15:11, Ben Woods wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 at 1:27 pm, Mark Millard wrote: > My poudiere jail constructions with the likes of -a arm64.aarch64 -x are > all getting: > > awk: can't open file /sys/param.h > source line number 1 > > Hi M

11.0-CURRENT -r276514: lib/libpjdlog/pjdlog.c has after

2015-03-21 Thread Mark Millard
: /usr/ports/lang/gcc5 Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/ports/head/lang/gcc5 Relative URL: ^/head/lang/gcc5 Repository Root: https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 381120 Node Kind: directory Schedule

Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r276514: lib/libpjdlog/pjdlog.c has after

2015-03-22 Thread Mark Millard
Copyright 1992. But I've not noticed any later ANSI/ISO material indicating the the above has changed status in more recent vintages of the standard. I could be wrong since I've not tried to be comprehensive about analyzing changes. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net On 2015-Mar-22

11.0-CURRENT: SCTP_MAX_CWND, lib/libc/net/sctp_sys_calls.c -r279859 vs. updating to head snaphot -r280598

2015-03-26 Thread Mark Millard
include/c++/v1/. -std=gnu++11 -L/usr/lib/. (The above and just below experiments with mostly(?) avoiding use of gcc 4.2.1, even for CC/CXX/CPP contexts.) > # ls -FPal /usr/bin/g[+c]* > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 48 Mar 20 02:03 /usr/bin/g++@ -> > /usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-f

11.0-CURRENT: SBUF_INCLUDENUL, /head/sys/kern/subr_sbuf.c -r280193 vs. updating to head snaphot -r280598

2015-03-27 Thread Mark Millard
-freebsd11.0-gcc > CXX=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-g++ > CPP=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-cpp > CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX=/usr/local/powerpc64-freebsd/bin/ > X_COMPILER_TYPE=gcc > CXXFLAGS+=-I/usr/obj/usr/srcC/tmp/usr/include/c++/v1/. -std=gnu++11 >

11.0-CURRENT: BIO_F_DGRAM_SCTP_WRITE, /head/crypto/openssl/crypto/bio/bio_err.c -r280297 vs. updating to head snaphot -r280598

2015-03-27 Thread Mark Millard
just below experiments with mostly(?) avoiding use of gcc 4.2.1, even for CC/CXX/CPP contexts.) > # ls -FPal /usr/bin/g[+c]* > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 48 Mar 20 02:03 /usr/bin/g++@ -> > /usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-g++ > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 48 Mar 19 04:20

11.0-CURRENT: DTLS1_VERSION_MAJOR, /head/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_asn1.c -r280297 vs. updating to head snaphot -r280598

2015-03-27 Thread Mark Millard
s since a dtls1.h was found.) The reference is finding /usr/include/openssl/dtls1.h (old) instead of /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/openssl/dtls1.h or /usr/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/dtls1.h (new): > # diff -w /usr/include/openssl/dtls1.h > /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include/openssl/dtls1

FYI: 11.0-CURRENT's contrib/ntp -r280915, some boot-time ntpd error messages

2015-04-01 Thread Mark Millard
# more /etc/src.conf > NO_WERROR= > WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS= > CC=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-gcc > CXX=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-g++ > CPP=/usr/local/bin/powerpc64-portbld-freebsd11.0-cpp > CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX=/usr/local/powerpc64-freebsd/bin/ &

Re: FYI: 11.0-CURRENT's contrib/ntp -r280915, some boot-time ntpd error messages

2015-04-01 Thread Mark Millard
n requested address > Mar 31 17:20:08 FBSDG5C0 ntpd[775]: setsockopt IPV6_MULTICAST_IF 0 for > [omitted] fails: Can't assign requested address === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net On 2015-Mar-31, at 07:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote: Basic context: > $ dmesg | head > ... > Fr

Re: FYI: 11.0-CURRENT's contrib/ntp -r280915, some boot-time ntpd error messages

2015-04-02 Thread Mark Millard
On 2015-Apr-1, at 08:12 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > I rebuilt and the boot-message line > > > Mar 31 17:20:08 FBSDG5C0 ntpd[775]: line 22 column 1 syntax error > > > is no longer is occurring. But I&#x

11.0-CURRENT SRC_ENV_CONF file vs. MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX in the file: they do not mix

2015-12-06 Thread Mark Millard
e set in this file are MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX, > WITH_DIRDEPS_BUILD, and WITH_META_MODE as they are environment-only > variables. === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/ma

11.0-CURRENT (on powerpc64) WITH_CCACHE_BUILD= : example failure

2015-12-06 Thread Mark Millard
ps://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/ports > Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 > Revision: 402906 > Node Kind: directory > Schedule: normal > Last Changed Author: wen > Last Changed Rev: 402906 > Last Changed Date: 2015-12-03 18:06:07 -0800 (Thu, 03 Dec 2015) ===

Re: 11.0-CURRENT (on powerpc64) WITH_CCACHE_BUILD= : example failure

2015-12-06 Thread Mark Millard
I'm adding a note about the missing "\" being just an E-mail editing error, not an original command error. . . On 2015-Dec-6, at 8:32 AM, Mark Millard wrote: > Mostly just an FYI: This means that for my own purposes I'll tend to avoid > WITH_CCACHE_BUILD= for now

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >