xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

1999-12-31 Thread Karl Denninger
27;m still verifying it, but it's certainly better than what is in the tree right now!) What does (someone) need to do to get this changed out/updated? I can't send it in as a port, since its part of the base package (setting it up as a port would be pretty trivial from what I can see) -

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-01 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 09:33:31AM -0800, John Polstra wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What does (someone) need to do to get this changed out/updated? I can't > > send it in as a port, si

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-01 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:11:51AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes: > > >This is not a port, its part of the RELEASE! > > > >Its several YEARS old, and doesn't work right - you get lots of STEP change

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-01 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 01:17:15AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Polstra writes: > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >Karl Denninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> It looks like ntpd (the new o

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-01 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 01:15:13AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes: > >On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:11:51AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes: > >>

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-01 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 01:31:25AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes: > > >Yes, and my driftfile had that parameter in there. Uhm, Poul, remember I've > >been at this for just a LITTLE while. Xntpd is something

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-01 Thread Karl Denninger
th OK, then we have a code problem... You have a code problem ;-) I can confirm this behavior; its been consistent with xntpd for a LONG time, which is why I raised the issue (it FINALLY got to the top of my "annoyance" list). -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://child

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 12:20:35PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes: > > >> >> Anyway, ntpd4 is in CURRENT... > >> > > >> >Now it is. > >> > > >> >And it works corr

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 12:22:38PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes: > > >> >Well... that won't help the 20 or so boxes here doing this all the > >> >time: > >> >Jan 1 11:26:46 gndrsh x

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
$605.73 for the one I'm delivering to the Danish Internet eXchange > point, that included antenna and 15m of cable. That's EXPENSIVE. Common handheld GPS units with NEMA outputs on them are well under $200 these days! -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
That sucks severely - NONE of the common units have the PPS output?! Barf. Oh well. -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first? See the above URL for a plan to do exactly that! On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 05:42

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 02:33:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes: > : That's EXPENSIVE. > > Worth every penny. We've seen sub-micro second syncronization with > our unit on good hardware, and 1-2us on the 48

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:32:00PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes: > : Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge? > > Because we need a PPS that is < 10nS from the true start of second for > our applicatio

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes: > > > >Why spend twice what Mr. Schwartz seems to want to charge? > > > >For the Motorola name? Sorry, the Batwing Menace to employee&#

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:42:24PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes: > : And on what hardware do you think you can obtain 10ns resolution RELIABLY > : at the software level in the Unix environment and under FreeBSD? > :

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes: > >On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:17:00PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes: >

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:50:35PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Karl Denninger writes: > : Yes, you have HARDWARE timers that do that. > : > : So what? > : > : I'm talking about TIME SERVERS on UNIX machines. > > So am I. >

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 03:13:10PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 04:53:55PM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > ..snip.. > > > If you intend to keep up this "sour grapes&q

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:17:59PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > > If you intend to keep up this "sour grapes" attitude, despite all > > > the helpful answers you have gotten so far, you should consider > >

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
ence to those of us who want to keep time on our networks. It is precisely this kind of elitism and bullshit that I continually run into when trying to deal with the "treehouse" FreeBSD kids, and in this particular instance its so blatent that I simply refuse to shut up about it. -- --

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:31:22PM -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > Why the hell Walnut Creek wastes their money on your type REMAINS beyond > > my comprehension. > > It really hasn't been a problem for anyone but you.

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:37:31PM -0500, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > How many millions does Paol have to count in HIS bank as a result of this > > shilling and "advocacy"? > > > > SOME OF US have *REAL* successes

[Majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG: Majordomo results: which]

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
my subscription to several of the lists? -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first? See the above URL for a plan to do exactly that! - Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-)

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
forget that act, and until you're identified and permanently removed from both the list and the entire project you'll have no contributions from me to your little treehouse project in any way, shape or form. -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org Is

Re: [Majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG: Majordomo results: which]

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
Uh, Matthew, I have the system logs here. I'm root. There was no bounce. And yes, I do know how SMTP works too. Nice try though. -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first? See the above URL for a

Re: [Majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG: Majordomo results: which]

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
Doesn't change the facts Gary. This isn't the first time either Gary. Plausable deniability isn't going to wash here. -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Web: http://childrens-justice.org Isn't it time we started putting KIDS first? See the above URL for a plan to d

One final note and a "bite me" to you

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
d that's enough for me. As for you Paol, perhaps some day you'll stop trying to bullshit people. Occasionally when you do that you run into someone who has AT LEAST a single class in physical science and understands the uncertainty of measurements. -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Your misleading, no, LYING message to me

2000-01-02 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 06:55:50PM -0800, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote: > From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > In-reply-to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (message from Karl > Dennin

Re: Survey results very helpful, thanks!

2010-03-08 Thread Karl Denninger
Doug Hardie wrote: > On 8 March 2010, at 06:53, Robert Watson wrote: > > >> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Robert Watson wrote: >> >> >>> If your system shows a non-zero value, please send me a *private e-mail* >>> with the output of that command, plus also the output of "sysctl kern.smp", >>> "upti

Compaq Presario 2140US w/Current - no mouse/pointpad?!

2003-06-13 Thread Karl Denninger
ssages once in a while during state changes such as from battery to AC) everything ELSE appears to work properly. -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.netTired of spam at your company? LOOK HERE! http://childrens-just

Compiling under 5.x for 4.x releases?

2003-06-14 Thread Karl Denninger
Can it be done with a command-line switch to the compiler or gcc, or am I consigned to dual-booting? I know the libraries are there for runtime, but can you build executables for them? -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger

Re: Compiling under 5.x for 4.x releases?

2003-06-14 Thread Karl Denninger
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 09:43:01AM -0700, Doug White wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, Karl Denninger wrote: > > > Can it be done with a command-line switch to the compiler or gcc, or am I > > consigned to dual-booting? > > You mean building apps linked against 4.X libs vs.

Re: Compiling under 5.x for 4.x releases?

2003-06-14 Thread Karl Denninger
Thanks; I guess that means that for now I keep the production build machine is 4.8-STABLE, and I keep 5.x as a "play" environment until people move over. The fun will begin when migration begins in significant numbers, but I still need to support both! -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL

-CURRENT "installworld" fails if not upgrading (e.g. building via Crochet)

2018-10-18 Thread Karl Denninger
build into "empty" media (not an upgrade) -- should the "DB_FROM_SRC" be detected on its own or is this just a Crochet screwball thing? -- Karl Denninger k...@denninger.net <mailto:k...@denninger.net> /The Market Ticker/ /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: GPT boot has less features than legacy MBR-based one (Was: UEFI, loader.efi and /boot.config)

2019-01-19 Thread Karl Denninger
ve is not terribly hard, so there's a *reasonable* recovery path available. I've not found a reliable way to do that sort of thing with many of the "newer" small-board devices and I really like it on, for example, my apu2 firewall appliances that I and others are using all over

Re: FreeBSD and Coreboot

2019-05-27 Thread Karl Denninger
problem. I don't know > whether they use GRUB or Seabios. (Aside: I'm thinking about ordering > some of these boards for my own use, so I'm generally interested in how > well they function with FreeBSD) > PCEngines machines run just fine with FreeBSD; I use and s

Re: UEFI firmware and getting FreeBSD recognized by default: who to talk to?

2019-06-22 Thread Karl Denninger
Refind for this sort of thing and it has (thus far!) survived upgrades.  The only "gotcha" is that I had a Windows 10 "Feature" upgrade that reset the default boot in the firmware to Windows; it didn't damage anything but did require that I go reset the UEFI default to boot th

Re: UEFI firmware and getting FreeBSD recognized by default: who to talk to?

2019-06-22 Thread Karl Denninger
On 6/22/2019 14:05, Rebecca Cran wrote: > On 2019-06-22 12:59, Karl Denninger wrote: >> I use Refind for this sort of thing and it has (thus far!) survived >> upgrades.  The only "gotcha" is that I had a Windows 10 "Feature" >> upgrade that reset the de

Re: UEFI firmware and getting FreeBSD recognized by default: who to talk to?

2019-06-22 Thread Karl Denninger
On 6/22/2019 20:16, Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Karl Denninger: > >> On 6/22/2019 14:05, Rebecca Cran wrote: >>> On 2019-06-22 12:59, Karl Denninger wrote: >>>> I use Refind for this sort of thing and it has (thus far!) survived >>>> upgrades. 

Re: UEFI firmware and getting FreeBSD recognized by default: who to talk to?

2019-06-23 Thread Karl Denninger
On 6/23/2019 02:36, Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Karl Denninger and my previous post: > >>> This is scary (Bitlocker), sent me to Wikipedia to look up Bitlocker. >>> >>> Can you turn Bitlocker off after turning it on and get your system back? >> You SHOULD

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

2019-08-21 Thread Karl Denninger
the E, it is not a L or T model) does have such a shell. > > Regards, > oh I would see if you can get REFIND loaded and use that.  I have a Lenovo X1 Carbon Gen 6 and that's the answer I used, as it allows multi-boot (e.g. Win10 and FreeBSD) easily. I've not had trouble wi

Crochet build for Pi3 fails to boot on r313441 (and later), works on r313109

2017-02-08 Thread Karl Denninger
and 313441 in the loader.efi and arm64 pieces of sys.. any ideas what boogered it? (Also have posted on this in -arm, but since it's Pi3 specific and that machine is -HEAD dependent is this the better place for it?) -- Karl Denninger k...@denninger.net <mailto:k...@denninger.net> /The Market Ticker/ /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Crochet build for Pi3 fails to boot on r313441 (and later), works on r313109

2017-02-09 Thread Karl Denninger
On 2/8/2017 16:18, Karl Denninger wrote: > r313441 blows up on the Pi3 in /boot/loader.efi with: > > FreeBSD/arm64 EFI loader, Revision 1.1 > (Tue Feb 7 15:15:52 CST 2017 free...@newfs.denninger.net) > Failed to start image provided by UFS (14) > "Synchronous Abort" h

Re: Crochet build for Pi3 fails to boot on r313441 (and later), works on r313109

2017-02-09 Thread Karl Denninger
On 2/9/2017 08:58, Toomas Soome wrote: >> On 9. veebr 2017, at 16:36, Karl Denninger wrote: >> >> >> On 2/8/2017 16:18, Karl Denninger wrote: >>> r313441 blows up on the Pi3 in /boot/loader.efi with: >>> >>> FreeBSD/arm64 EFI loader,

Re: Crochet build for Pi3 fails to boot on r313441 (and later), works on r313109

2017-02-09 Thread Karl Denninger
On 2/9/2017 15:39, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote: > Toomas Soome (tso...@me.com) wrote: >>> On 9. veebr 2017, at 17:05, Karl Denninger wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 2/9/2017 08:58, Toomas Soome wrote: >>>>> On 9. veebr 2017, at 16:36, Ka

Re: SMART: disk problems on RAIDZ1 pool: (ada6:ahcich6:0:0:0): CAMstatus: ATA Status Error

2017-12-23 Thread Karl Denninger
at, I'm disappointed about the fact that WD has also > implemented this > "timebomb" Load_Cycle_Count issue. > > Thanks a lot for your help and considerations! > > Kind regards, > Oliver I have a fairly large number of HGST "NAS" drives in service

Recent commits to -HEAD blow up cross-compile for PI3 (and possibly others)

2018-01-15 Thread Karl Denninger
1, 0b11011, "fcvtzu", fp_to_uint>; Off -HEAD revision 328011 attempting to build with: FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #21 r327332M: Thu Dec 28 20:54:24 CST 2017 k...@newfs.denninger.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KSD-SMP -- Karl Denninger k...@denninger.net <mailto:k...@denninger.net> /The Market Ticker/ /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Apparently FIXED: Re: Pkg repository is broken...

2020-03-07 Thread Karl Denninger
iq -c >112 FreeBSD:12:* >219 FreeBSD:12:amd64 > > Note that you could also export ALTABI to the environment or set it > in /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf, but I figured that I might forget it in > there. > > Also, it seems like none of my packages were affected and not setting

Re: what 3rd party boot mgr is required to boot multiple freebsd versions?

2020-03-16 Thread Karl Denninger
> Should I just convert the 1st efi (GPT) boot partition > to a PMBR, and delete the second efi partition. Or is > there a recommended bootmanager I can use to boot multiple > versions of FreeBSD? Windows? > > Thank you! > > --Chris > Refind perhaps? -- Karl Denninger k..

Re: what 3rd party boot mgr is required to boot multiple freebsd versions?

2020-03-16 Thread Karl Denninger
On 3/16/2020 17:33, Chris wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:24:24 -0500 Karl Denninger k...@denninger.net said > >> On 3/16/2020 17:23, Chris wrote: >> > I'm attempting to boot multiple versions of FreeBSD. >> > I started with an install of older 11 with a (u)e