ra
66GB waste (that's 37% waste!) would provide.
Your point about time storage is correct, however, I believe. Using
long instead of time_t is just asking for problems. There's probably
some hysterical raison for it.
... Joe
--
in person. Particularly since
you seem to have more time and energy to spend posting to Usenet and
mailing lists than anyone else I know. ;-)
... Joe
---
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAI
;bind to address nn.nn.nn.nn") for local use anyways.
Looks like the jail code will do something similar w/o source changes.
Oh well!
... Joe
-------
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAI
s. But that could also be
because the network environment is much more controlled internally.
... Joe
-------
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwauk
-l
16
Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the
machine.
... Joe
---
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milw
> At 08:51 AM 12/8/99 -0600, Joe Greco wrote:
> >Most of which are routes pointing at the 3 private-net interfaces on the
> >machine.
>
> The info was provided more as a comparison, that quantity of routes do not
> necessary mean leak ? Or perhaps it does. But after 90
>
> :
> :At 1:26 PM -0600 1999/12/8, Joe Greco wrote:
> :
> :>> vmstat -m | grep routetbl|grep K
> :> routetbl289178 40961K 40961K 40960K 4357410 0
> :>16,32,64,128,256
> :>> netstat -rn | wc -l
> :>16
>
> P
To The Machine --
> Bob Vaughan | techie@{w6yx|tantivy}.stanford.edu | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>| P.O. Box 9792, Stanford, Ca 94309-9792
> -- I am Me, I am only Me, And no one else is Me, What could be simpler? --
>
--
... Joe
---
s BIND.
While it is fantastic that FreeBSD comes out of the box so fully
functional, it does make it a bit of a pain for those of us who intend
to build servers - we have to disable the original before installing a
new package. :-/
--
... Joe
---
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 05:21:24PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > While it is fantastic that FreeBSD comes out of the box so fully
> > functional, it does make it a bit of a pain for those of us who intend
> > to build servers - we have to disable the original before install
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > > In other words, if we're going to be replacing sendmail with an
> > > alternative MTA, I'd prefer postfix over qmail, and I believe I can
> > > marshall some pretty strong arguments for that posi
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > Uh, Chuck, can you tell me how many BIND and Sendmail advisories there have
> > been in the last five years?
> >
> > Wouldn't it be nice if we could just tell newbies, "hey, yeah, that Sendmail
> > has
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2000, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> > Chuck,
> >
> > Please go back and read what I _wrote_. Your response assumes I made
>
> I've got your message, I quoted it fully in my first response. You asked
> to "Remove Sendmail from the base sy
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 05:21:24PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > Remove Sendmail from the base system - or, at least, make it a "package"
> > that is removable with the package management tool. Then be able to add
> > another mailer (or an updated Sendmail) i
l. Any ssh hackers looking at this, by any
chance?
--
... Joe
-------
Joe Greco - Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/342
ir files.
So far, they seem to have gotten the message, because I've only seen
one unauthorized file attempted upload this week. >:->
--
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net
"We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance
t, but
my searching hasn't turned up anything that would explain this. Certainly
the manual page ought to be updated if this is a new expected behaviour or
something... at least some clue as to why it might fail would be helpful.
... JG
--
Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI -
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Joe Greco wrote:
> > I've got a weirdness with kill(2).
> >
> > This code is out of Diablo, the news package, and has been working fine for
> > some years. It apparently works fine on other OS's.
> >
> > In the Diablo
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Joe Greco wrote:
> > The specific OS below is 5.1-RELEASE but apparently this happens on 4.8
> > as well.
>
> Could you confim this happens with 4.8? The access control checks there
> are substantially different, and I wouldn't expect the be
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Joe Greco wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Joe Greco wrote:
> > > > The specific OS below is 5.1-RELEASE but apparently this happens on 4.8
> > > > as well.
> > >
> > > Could you confim this happens with 4.8? T
afety net"
category.
Now, if you'd LIKE the OS to provide a wonderful fantastic safety net, then
by all means, STFU and go write one.
I'm continually amazed at the fantastic improvements being introduced into
FreeBSD on a regular basis...
... Joe
----------
21 matches
Mail list logo
