On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 07:09:58PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Although function calls are more expensive than inline code,
> > they aren't necessarily a lot more so, and function calls to
> > non-locked RMW operations are certainly much cheaper than
> > inline locked RMW operations.
>
> This is
On Mon, Jul 12, 1999 at 10:38:03PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> I said:
> > than indirect function calls on some architectures: inline
> > branched code. So you still have a global variable selecting
> > locked/non-locked, but it's a boolean, rather than a pointer.
> > Your atomic macros are then {
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 04:24:41PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Robey
>writes:
> > : I would think using a fixed order would be a really bad thing, causing
> > : overload of the first server in line. Did I misunderst
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 06:53:51PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> Since the hostname is simply a plain-text token for the IP address, it
> has to remain bound to the IP address (whether that binding is fixed or
> dynamic is outside the scope of this discussion). Having a hostname that
> doesn't ma
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 01:04:27PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> and the like. On a recent -current snap, this returns
>
> ufs:fd0a
>
> I used the previous behaviour in picobsd's rc to mount
> the file system from the boot device,
>
> set `df /` ; dev="/dev/$8"
> ech
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 12:48:53AM -0500, Jim Bloom wrote:
> I have been using cpp on my firewall to expand my local firewall rules and fill
> in the local address and subnetmask. This makes things easier my ISP decides to
> change my IP address using DHCP. My firewall is running an approximatel
On Fri, Sep 03, 1999 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
> This is no longer necessary (in fact it causes much confusion for the
> driver). The correct declaration for a pnp soundcard is 'device pcm0'.
How do you set flags for particular cards, now? I used to have
to use the flags option to
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 01:41:41PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 01:29:40AM +1000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >Before attempting to build world, you must make and install a new
> >kernel. The new kernel will contain new syscalls that are needed during
> >build world. doscmd i
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 12:13:32PM +0200, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> The problem
> ---
> When doing a make world, tools are being built that are used by the
> build process. This is to make sure that the tools are appropriate for
> doing a make world. The problem we now face is that the sig
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 03:36:11PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> But this still doesn't entirely solve the problem. You still have
> to build and install a new kernel before installing the world.
Of course! Installing the world _is_ upgrading your operating
system. I don't see anyone suggesti
On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 05:48:31PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> The problem is apparently due to the following code fragment:
>
> register u_short answer = 0;
> [...]
> /* mop up an odd byte, if necessary */
> if (nleft == 1) {
> *(u_char *)(&answer) = *(
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 11:24:50PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matthew Dillon writes:
> : complex. For example, using fixed-length FIFOs rather then linked lists.
> : The writer manipulates the write index variable, the reader manipulates
> : the read in
On Mon, Apr 17, 2000 at 11:17:15PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Once per day the machine cvsups, checks out a virgin source tree,
> tries to build GENERIC, GENERIC98, LINT and world. If any of these
> builds fail it will send a report like this.
>
> On Sundays the report will always be sen
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 07:23:00PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Chris Piazza wrote:
>
> > It's working from my 5.0 box to my 4.0-R box across town, too.
> >
> > -Chris
>
> Thanks. There's one data point. Now it's evidently nothing in the
> code, as it fails e
On Fri, Apr 21, 2000 at 01:25:20AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Andrew Reilly" writes:
> : Have you got "X11Forwarding yes"
>
> Ahem. "ForwardX11 yes" is what's documented and is known to work.
Bzzzt. Ma
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 06:36:14PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mitsuru IWASAKI writes:
> >: Maybe I'm wrong because of lack of my understanding on crush dump and
> >: loader. Please help us :-)
> >
> >I th
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:01:46PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Andrew Reilly" writes:
> : That sounds way too hard. Why not restrict suspend activity to
> : user-level processes and bring the kernel/drivers back up through
> : a reg
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:30:55PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:16:08AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> > (*) Speaking of which: why are we considering doing process
> > dumps into a _different_ swap-ish partition, instead of just
> > ensuring t
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:40:30PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> The real issue here is persistent system state across the S4 suspend; ie.
> leaving applications open, etc. IMO this isn't really something worth a
> lot of effort to us, and it has a lot of additional complications for a
> "server-c
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 12:47:38PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bjoern Fischer writes:
> : Just a moment. You talk about doing a `Save-to-Disk' (incl. system halt),
> : turning power off, maybe adding some hardware or moving the machine
> : to another location, then s
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 08:40:44PM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Jun Kuriyama wrote:
>
> > And we should keep that master text simple to ease modification by
> > hackers. If we force to write complex markups, hackers will *forget*
> > to update that master text. :-)
>
> I'm not sure I would
On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 08:29:23AM -0400, Nathan Binkert wrote:
> The patch does work for client side. I have verified that I can connect
> to a windows server using chap v2, but I forgot to do something for
> server. Shouldn't take me long. If you need the server part before
> Brian gets back,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 10:54:44PM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> However, note that you need to move LOCALBASE and X11BASE for *all*
> ports, not one. (For instance, you can't expect an emacs-lisp package
> to install correctly if you just try to move it while emacs is still
> in
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 05:19:34PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> So I'm a bit stumped as far as formulating an easy How-To-Repeat is
> concerned. :-(
How about wedging a printenv into the makefile, before the call
to awk, so that you can re-create the environment when testing
it?
--
Andrew
T
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:24:14PM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Sunday, 25 March 2001 at 23:48:10 -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Greg Lehey wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, 21 March 2001 at 10:44:38 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> >>> The Portmapper binary has been renamed from `portmap' to `rpcbind'.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:50:08AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> For the people wanting to turn on write caching ... it WILL break
> the write ordering needed by softupdates and journaling filesystems,
> so don't do it unless you know what you're doing.
>
> I guess it would be better to do this ki
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 12:31:10PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
> Not /usr/local - that's for locally maintained software. I'd rather it
> go on /usr, so I don't like /opt. When I got to choose, I chose
> /usr/opt. But anything other than /usr/local on /usr would do as well.
So do you also put the co
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 09:46:46PM -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
> Fixing broken things is a good thing. Your argument about moving it
> from /usr/local to show how broken is a good test procedure, but turning
> it into policy is something completely different.
>
> I think the 'tradition' of FreeB
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 05:23:38PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 05:20:57PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote:
> > i might have stumbled upon a problem with clang. i've compiled a kernel from
> > the clang branch using `make kernel INSTKERNNAME=clang` and booted from it.
> > i'm n
Hi all,
Sorry to interrupt this thread with an off-topic question, but
it seems vaguely related, and you folk seem to be the right ones
to ask:
I've recently done a drive upgrade in a 1U rack machine that
only had space for the two active drives that were in it, and I
couldn't afford the down-tim
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 12:06:49PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote:
> i was able to pinpoint the
> exact function which is causing the problem:
>
> it's snd_xbytes().
This is an odd-looking function. Its purpose is to compute the
size of a target buffer for a block of audio samples that might
be sam
Hi all,
I'm not sure if it's related (I get my src via csup, so I don't
have svn reveision numbers), but I upgraded about 16 hours ago
again a few hours after that, and my two-core AMD64 system has
been (seemingly) quite unstable. I've had a few boot cycles
that have failed and dumped me out into
Hi Kip,
Sorry for the delay: it's been a tussle...
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 04:42:12PM -0700, K. Macy wrote:
> Does FBSDID get expanded when checking out with csup?
Looks like it:
> __FBSDID("$FreeBSD: head/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c 207452 2010-04-30
> 22:31:37Z kmacy $");
My version says:
__FBSDID("
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:15:55PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> got any other suggestions?
This is very much a "sorry I asked" question, but is none-the
less quite a good one, given the size of the hole to be plugged.
I think that a reasonable answer for this sort of thing might be
one of the dyna
Hi Luigi,
On 19/08/2010, at 00:28 , Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> slightly off topic but I disagree on the latter part.
I didn't expect everyone to agree. Not sure that I do, necessarily, either.
(A neat, small language like TCL or Lua is probably better for most of the uses
we're discussing here.)
I didn't want to prolong this now mostly off-topic discussion
too much, but:
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:00:54PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> +1 for a scheme shell, but not for the heavy-weight variety that
> compiles to C, as that would tie them to a subset of ${ARCH}es.
Why do you say that? Most
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:40:37PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Will have to disagree on that - part of the point of having such a
> thing would be to attract young developers, and while the CS crowd
> will be happy with LISP, anyone starting programming after the first
> .com bubble will probably be
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> you think so? judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact
> imo.
On Linux. Have you ever seen those sorts of UI problems on FreeBSD? I don't
watch much video on my systems, but I haven't seen that. FreeBSD has a
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 02:55:27PM -0500, Anthony Kimball wrote:
>
> : > All I want is that a program gets NULL from malloc if there is no memory
> : > available. I find that to be a very fundamental thing about malloc.
>
> : Do you have a solution? We don't.
>
> Make an sbrk variant which will
On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 04:34:53PM +0100, Dom Mitchell wrote:
> On 7 June 1999, Ben Rosengart proclaimed:
> > I am curious as to why tcp_wrappers are present in /usr/src/contrib as
> > well as in the ports collection. Can someone please enlighten me? TIA.
>
> To support 2.2.x users?
Maybe 3.x
Just to prefix with my config:
FreeBSD duncan.reilly.home 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #7: Sat May 29
11:20:54 EST 2010 r...@duncan.reilly.home:/nb/obj/nb/src/sys/DUNCAN amd64
Current source tree was csupped about half an hour ago.
I don't think that my hardware has gone dodgy: everything
On Mon, 31 May 2010 16:30:04 +0300
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Have you been playing with clang or other alternative compilers?
I have them all installed, but none are used by the build
process. My make.conf is relatively clean.
> If not, then I think that it's your hardware.
I did too at first. C
On Mon, 31 May 2010 21:17:41 -0700
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> What _is_ your make.conf though?
Just this:
#CC=clang
CFLAGS+=-g
CXXFLAGS+=-g
KERNCONF=DUNCAN
NO_LPR=YES
NO_SENDMAIL=YES
WITH_GTK2=yes
WITH_CUPS=yes
WITH_GECKO=libxul
#WITH_DEBUG=yes
A4=yes
QT4_OPTIONS=CUPS NAS QGTKSTYLE
PORTSDIR=/nb/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 31 May 2010 17:01:15 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Is it really such a bad thing to have gcc as a build-dependency
> for various ported applications?
There are already ports that have gcc-4.4.4 as a dependency, and
a few that still require g
Hi Garrett,
On Mon, 31 May 2010 21:36:23 -0700
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Ok... there appear to be some interesting bits here, but I'm
> curious... when was the last time that you did a build with clang, and
> did you properly clean out /usr/obj, etc since your last compile?
I don't think that I e
I've been trying on-and-off for weeks, and haven't been able to
crack it. The configure script goes looking for Kerberos 5 and
can't find it, even though it's in the base.
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
Hi there,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:57:56AM +0800, Buganini wrote:
> I'm using it without problem,
> do you have any of *_HEIMDAL or *_KERBEROS in make.conf/src.conf?
No. The problem, as far as I can tell, is that the search for
krb5 in the configure script tests three options, (mit, heimdal
an
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:23:37AM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> in /etc/src.conf - WITHOUT_LPR=yes
>
> and these symbolic links in /usr/bin
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 Mar 18 2009 /usr/bin/lp ->
> /usr/local/bin/lp
> lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 24 Mar 18 2009 /usr/bin/lpoptions ->
Hi Kostik,
On 06/07/2010, at 18:54 , Kostik Belousov wrote:
> You need to gather and show exact command that fails.
There's some a little more info in PR: ports/145769, although the "fix" that I
suggest there is almost certainly a wrong turn (I nuked all reference to MD2_*
from libhx509, there
Hi Kostik,
On 06/07/2010, at 22:33 , Kostik Belousov wrote:
> "Install evolution-data-server" as a reference to the command is a sure way
> to not get any help.
Why, because no-one uses ports?
> I asked for explicit command that fails, PR does not contain this information.
> It is not even clea
Hi Kostik,
Thanks for looking at this,
On 06/07/2010, at 23:46 , Kostik Belousov wrote:
> Ok, this is useful. But, on the HEAD from Jul 2, I cannot reproduce it,
> with conftest.c and command line above. As well as on the stable/8 that
> is approx. one month old.
>
> On both systems, MD2_* symbo
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 06/07/2010 15:14:28, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> > So: how should I "fix" this, properly, on my -current system? Is it
> > as simple as installing heimdal from ports? I can't remove openssl-1.0:
> &
Hi there,
I've been providing a light-use samba server on my
freebsd-current box, mostly for secondary storage my wife's
laptop. It's worked mostly-fine for a dozen years. I've never
seen anything like this before, and am not sure where to start
poking it. Here's the output of netstat and ps, f
samba blockage I
wasn't receiving any mail (via fetchmail --> local qmail smtp
server), but had no trouble connecting to the system over ssh,
or doing most other things.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 06:50:25PM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> This is on:
> FreeBSD duncan.reilly.home 9.0-
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 08:25:57PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> as part of my netmap investigations, i was looking at how
> expensive are memory copies, and here are a couple of findings
> (first one is obvious, the second one less so)
Most C compilers (well, the ones I regularly use) inline small,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 02:27:40AM +0800, blubee blubeeme wrote:
> I'd love to see if RISC-V is vulnerable to this?
>
> I think they are in the best position to capitalize on this clusterfk...
It's a micro-architecture flaw, not an instruction set flaw, so
just as for ARM and amd64, it will depen
Hi,
I do a weekly build to track changes, on 12-current since I gave my fileserver
this new Ryzen motherboard a few months ago. I switched to current because
there was some badness in 11-stable that I attributed to new processor
twitchiness (wouldn't reboot, temperature sensors not working.)
vendor=0x1022 subdevice=0x1456 class=0x108000
cc_vegas.ko
The output above suggests that there isn't a driver attached to that device
anyway, though.
Cheers,
Andrew Reilly
> On 18 Feb 2018, at 00:06 , Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
> On 02/17/18 13:42, Hans Petter Selasky wrot
Hi all,
For reasons that still escape me, I haven't been able to get a kernel dump to
debug, sorry.
Just thought that I'd generate a fairly low-quality report, to see if anyone
has some ideas.
The last kernel that I have that booted OK (and I'm now running) is:
FreeBSD Zen.ac-r.nu 12.0-CURRENT
>
>On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Reilly
>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> For reasons that still escape me, I haven't been able to get a kernel
>dump
>> to debug, sorry.
>>
>> Just thought that I'd generate a fairly low-quality repo
ings in an unexpected state, perhaps? That change (r331070) by cem@
is just a few revisions after the one that is working for me. I'll start
looking there...
Cheers,
Andrew
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 07:49:17AM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> Hi Warner,
>
> The breakage was in 331470,
tack related, and my kernel is panicking
long before any network activity happens.
Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Andrew
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 05:23:18PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> Thanks Andrew... I can't recreate this on my VM nor my real hardware.
>
> Warner
>
> On Sa
tack related, and my kernel is panicking
long before any network activity happens.
Any suggestions?
Cheers,
Andrew
On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 08:14:40AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> Also, what rev failed? I booted r331464 last night w/o issue.
>
> Warner
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9
our kernel config file. That won’t really “fix” anything, but should at
> least get you a booting system (assuming the new code from r331347 is
> really triggering a problem).
>
>
> I’ll take another look to see if I missed something in the commit. But, at
> the moment, I’m hard-
64 matches
Mail list logo
