Jason Young wrote:
Saturday, January 08, 2000 9:02 AM
> It probably isn't the best of all ideas to have BOTH IP firewalling
> solutions installed and running at once. This will add some
> overhead. Pick one and stick with it. And why do you have DUMMYNET
> running?
>
> There is a new version
Garrett Wollman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2000 7:27 PM
> You should also try it with `options COMPAT_IPFW=0' in your config
> file.
Hm, what's this option for?
When I put it into my kernel config, the config program complained
about an "unknown option". A qu
At 17:16 09.03.2000 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > the variable being defined and not its value. You might try removing
> > your object directory and doing a make cleandir twice to make sure
> > nothing is left in source tree that shouldn't be there.
>
>Yes, thats a likely candidate. Can you tr
On 27.08.1999, 10:52, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> Sorry, I've lived in Europe, you can't pull that one on me. :)
> In Germany, for example, it's possible to sue someone simply for
> sticking their finger against their forehead. The myth that only the
> U.S. is litigious is just that, a myth.
Anyone aware of them?
After building a complete kernel + world with a very recent -current
(Saturday morning, european time) I now get lots of shared memory errors
in gnome (most coming from gdk and imlib, some from Xfree 4 aswell). I
recompiled parts of gnome (gtk+, imlib, glib) and the situ
At 16:30 23.06.2000 -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>> > modified my shared memory settings in my kernel config either. If
>> > the problem is indeed Xfree 4.0, then I guess it must be a driver
>> > issue (I'm using the neomagic driver).
>>
>>You are running sawfish, and I'm willing to bet a not
At 18:41 23.06.2000 -0400, Christopher Masto wrote:
> > BTW: It's for sure _not_ a -current issue and might have nothing to do
> > with FreeBSD at all, since I'am running 4.0-STABLE on this machine, with
> > Xfree 4.0 and Gnome 1.2.
>
>Which video card/driver are you using? (Mine is tdfx and s3v
At 09:15 07.08.2000 +0200, Benedikt Schmidt wrote:
>Just wanted to say that with the recent changes in the
>emu10k1 driver all my problems with it have disappeared.
>
>There are no more "dodgy irq" messages
>and the sound quality has improved too (no more crackling).
Just a quick question...
Is
Hi
This isn't exactly topic here, but it might be useful as a little hint
or warning...
Even most recent versions of libtool (1.2e imho) fail to check for
freebsd4* (as expected). As a result, they set can_build_shared to "no"
which disables building of shared libraries.
This affects most major
Hi!
I'am not sure where this comes from, but at the moment I have some
troubles with the userland ppp.
The symptoms: After establishing the connection and setting the
defaultroute *nothing* works, that means, the line seems
to be completely dead. Not even the peer can
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Brian Somers wrote:
> Are you using a routing daemon ? Also, have you tried just having
> ``add default HISADDR'' in ppp.conf and leaving everything out of
> ppp.linkup ? What do your routing tables look like before/during/after
> the hang ?
I usually run routed, yes, an
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Brian Somers wrote:
> To find out if this is the problem, can you try connecting
> interactively. You should see the same delay. You can then try
> again, but during the delay, pressing return a few times at the
> prompt should wake ppp up. Is this happening ?
Well, I t
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Mike Zanker wrote:
> Having just upgraded my motherboard/CPU to a BX chip set and Celeron 333 I
> attempted to boot into my 3.0-STABLE system. However, as soon as the kernel
> starts to boot I get
>
> panic: cpu class not configured
>
> and the machine reboots (and so on...)
[NOTE: this article has nothing technical, but since I assume most of
the developers are reading here, I'am posting this here.]
Tomorrow, I will "celebrate" my 1-year anniversary with FreeBSD.
When I started with fbsd, I wasn't exactly an Unix newbie. In fact, I
have been using Linux and
John Birrell writes:
> FWIW, this message is being edited with vi on a 2.2.8-STABLE machine
> rlogged in from a dxterm running on an OSF/1 box. The keyboard is one
> of DEC's LK401 things with the funny "Do" keys etc from back when VAX
> was just a twinkle in PDP's eye. I have TERM=vt100 in my Fr
Chris Tubutis writes:
> > whenever I click a mailto: HREF it inadvertly dumps core.
>
>
> Does it truly dump core, or does it merely go away?
Can't speak for the original poster, but my Netscrap 4.5 shows the same
behaviour:
[16]a...@darkstar:/alex #>/usr/local/netscape/netscape
[now clicki
Mike Smith writes:
> > > I usually keep -O to just '-O' - I had been upping it recently, but then
> > > it
> > > started breaking even some of my simple programs, so leasson learn't, it's
> > > staying at just '-O' from now on in... (safety first? :-)
> >
> > -O2 works fine too. -O3 does not. W
Monday, March 01, 1999, 6:20:06 PM, you wrote:
>> Just make libg++ a port. :-)
> Yes, or abandon it entirely. We surely don't need it in our base
> system. Even for ports, I'd be surprised to find anything useful that
> still relied on libg++. Any software that still uses libg++ is almost
>
Dienstag, Dienstag, 02. März 1999, you wrote:
DOB> Netscape uses a *A.OUT* libg++. We are an *ELF* system now. If you want
DOB> to run Netscape (also a piece of a.out code) you would install the
DOB> compat22 distribution bits.
Then I probably misinterpreted the term "abandon it entirely".
DOB
19 matches
Mail list logo
