Monday, March 01, 1999, 6:20:06 PM, you wrote:
>> Just make libg++ a port. :-)
> Yes, or abandon it entirely. We surely don't need it in our base
> system. Even for ports, I'd be surprised to find anything useful that
> still relied on libg++. Any software that still uses libg++ is almost
> certainly unmaintained, and uncompilable with modern C++ compilers.
> (I.e., it does not conform to the C++ standard.) Libg++ is _ancient_.
> It pre-dated templates even.
Netscape still uses libg++
/usr/local/netscape/netscape:
[...]
-lg++.4 => /usr/lib/aout/libg++.so.4.0 (0x10c5c000)
-lm.2 => /usr/lib/aout/libm.so.2.0 (0x10c98000)
-lstdc++.2 => /usr/lib/aout/libstdc++.so.2.0 (0x10cb2000)
-lc.3 => /usr/lib/aout/libc.so.3.1 (0x10ce8000)
And most will imho agree on the fact, that Netscape is in some ways
useful :)
--
# /AS/ a...@psa.at / PGP key available on request and from keys.pgp.com #
# If jesus was never born, we would not have a Y2K problem. #
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
