https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197921
Zhenlei Huang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||z...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #3 fr
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:07:30PM -0800, Enji Cooper wrote:
Was the kernel/utility built with IPv6? If not, that’s a general
bug which should be filed (which can be easily checked/avoided
using the FEATURES(9) subsystem)…
Cheers!
-Enji
world/kernel was built with WITHOUT_INET6= in /etc/src
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 12:41:02PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:27 AM void wrote:
Hi,
Does /var/mail still need atime?
I've installed a ufs2-based -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on
rpi4/8BG which installs into one / . If it's mounted with noatime,
will it have consequenc
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:47:59AM +0100, Olivier Certner wrote:i
So, to me, at this point, it still sounds more than a gimmick
than something really useful. If someone has a precise use case
for it and motivation, than of course please go ahead.
The only use-cases I [1] can think of are eit
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024, at 05:13, void wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:47:59AM +0100, Olivier Certner wrote:i
>
>> So, to me, at this point, it still sounds more than a gimmick
>> than something really useful. If someone has a precise use case
>> for it and motivation, than of course please go
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024, at 04:47, void wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 12:41:02PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
>>On Sun, Jan 7, 2024 at 5:27 AM void wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does /var/mail still need atime?
>>>
>>> I've installed a ufs2-based -current main-n267425-aa1223ac3afc on
>>> rpi4/8BG which install
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:24:53AM +, void wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:07:30PM -0800, Enji Cooper wrote:
Was the kernel/utility built with IPv6? If not, that’s a general bug
which should be filed (which can be easily checked/avoided using the
FEATURES(9) subsystem)…
Cheers!
-Enji
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 12:24:40PM +, void wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 10:24:53AM +, void wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:07:30PM -0800, Enji Cooper wrote:
Was the kernel/utility built with IPv6? If not, that’s a general
bug which should be filed (which can be easily checked/avoi
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 2:47 AM void wrote:
> I was concerned that email might not work right without atime.
> So far, it seems to be working OK.
>
Depending on how you define "correct". Deliveries won't be affected by
atime setting in any way; telling if you have new mail _may_ be affected,
but
I tried to update my 15.0-CURRENT box from n267335-499e84e16f56 to a
very recent commit. The build and install went fine. After booting with
new base, I got a page fault with the following error:
Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held:
shared rm netlink lock (netlink loc
Rainer,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:23:54PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
R> I tried to update my 15.0-CURRENT box from n267335-499e84e16f56 to a very
R> recent commit. The build and install went fine. After booting with new
R> base, I got a page fault with the following error:
Sorry for that, my
On Tue, Jan 9, 2024, 11:11 AM Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
> rob...@rrbrussell.com wrote in
> <5f370bce-bcdb-47ea-aaa7-551ee092a...@app.fastmail.com>:
> |On Tue, Jan 9, 2024, at 05:13, void wrote:
> |> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:47:59AM +0100, Olivier Certner wrote:i
> |>> So, to me, at this point
On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:40:52AM +0100, Jakob Alvermark wrote:
J> > > --- trap 0xc, rip = 0x...f80d97b78, rsp = 0x...
J> > > nl_send_one() at nl_send_one+0x18/frame 0xf
J> > > nl_send_group() at nl_send_group+0x1bc/frame 0xf...
J> > > _nlmsg_flush() at _nlmsg_flush+0x37/frame 0xf...
J
Am 09.01.24 um 21:40 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff:
Rainer,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 09:23:54PM +0100, Rainer Hurling wrote:
R> I tried to update my 15.0-CURRENT box from n267335-499e84e16f56 to a very
R> recent commit. The build and install went fine. After booting with new
R> base, I got a page faul
14 matches
Mail list logo
