On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
> I'm not expecting a reply to this, it was something that come up
> discussing building custom kernels.
>
> Just wondering if someone may be interested in looking at the
> possibility of changing username length to a sysctl.
>
> As the number
On 2016-05-14 08:49, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Shane Ambler wrote:
>
>> I'm not expecting a reply to this, it was something that come up
>> discussing building custom kernels.
>>
>> Just wondering if someone may be interested in looking at the
>> possibility
After recent system update (I'm on FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r298793)
LibreOffice doesn't see CUPS printers. It shows only "Generic printer",
but doesn't actually print anything.
Thanks for advices!
S.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lis
El día Saturday, May 14, 2016 a las 12:27:28PM -0600, Sergey Manucharian
escribió:
> After recent system update (I'm on FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r298793)
> LibreOffice doesn't see CUPS printers. It shows only "Generic printer",
> but doesn't actually print anything.
Libreoffice and cups are ports or
A little history about this issue:
http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-2304
> On May 14, 2016, at 12:17 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>
> Many people consider the traditional behavior to be a security risk, which is
> why this was changed.
>
> FreeBSD is welcome to make --in
Many people consider the traditional behavior to be a security risk, which is
why this was changed.
FreeBSD is welcome to make --insecure the default on FreeBSD, but I'm reluctant
to do that in the upstream libarchive project.
Tim
> On May 12, 2016, at 8:54 AM, Martin Matuska wrote:
>
> Loo
From the looks of this, I think it's likely better to have the default
be "secure" and ezjail-admin use the "--insecure" flag as an explicit
override. That's the only place I've noticed the need for it although
I've not done an extensive search for any other instances in which it
might be requi
On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 15:51 -0400, michael butler wrote:
> From the looks of this, I think it's likely better to have the
> default
> be "secure" and ezjail-admin use the "--insecure" flag as an explicit
> override. That's the only place I've noticed the need for it although
> I've not done an ex
Excerpts from Matthias Apitz's message from Sat 14-May-16 20:47:
> El día Saturday, May 14, 2016 a las 12:27:28PM -0600, Sergey Manucharian
> escribió:
>
> > After recent system update (I'm on FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r298793)
> > LibreOffice doesn't see CUPS printers. It shows only "Generic printer"
In message <20160514211909.gc1...@dendrobates.araler.com>, Sergey Manucharian w
rites:
>I've built kernel and world, cups and libreoffice were isnstalled as
>packages:
I just spent two hours finding out that shell pipes on -current(-ish),
r297556, returns EAGAIN when full:
https
Ian, we are here talking about cpio, not libarchive. The flag in
libarchive is not active by default.
On 14.05.2016 22:08, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-05-14 at 15:51 -0400, michael butler wrote:
>> From the looks of this, I think it's likely better to have the
>> default
>> be "secure" and
On Sun, 2016-05-15 at 01:29 +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Ian, we are here talking about cpio, not libarchive. The flag in
> libarchive is not active by default.
>
Yes. We use cpio for filesystem images, for historical reasons (such
as cpio's ability to encode device major/minor node numbers an
> On May 14, 2016, at 16:29, Martin Matuska wrote:
>
> Ian, we are here talking about cpio, not libarchive. The flag in
> libarchive is not active by default.
>
> On 14.05.2016 22:08, Ian Lepore wrote:
>> The real damage will happen to out-of-tree users. I think this will
>> impact our softwa
That switch is "--insecure" and is supported in all libarchive versions
freebsd ever used.
On 15.05.2016 01:36, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote:
>> On May 14, 2016, at 16:29, Martin Matuska wrote:
>>
>> Ian, we are here talking about cpio, not libarchive. The flag in
>> libarchive is not active
Greetings,
My first post here so please be gentle.
I am seeing 'lock order reversal' errors during boot on 11-CURRENT -
r298793. A sample error:
lock order reversal:
1st 0xf8011280d068 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2498
2nd 0xfe01ca539400 bufwait (bufwait) @
/usr/src/sy
15 matches
Mail list logo