i just want to run multiple IPs for single network card in freebsd
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Yasir hussan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know usage of multi-homing in freebsd, if YES kindly guid me
> how i can test it on my own PC.
>
> Thanks
>
___
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Yasir hussan wrote:
>
> Does anyone know usage of multi-homing in freebsd, if YES kindly guid me
> how i can test it on my own PC.
>
>
This question seems almost so simple as to be a trick question. By
definition, put two ethernet cards in your FreeBSD computer, g
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Yasir hussan wrote:
> i just want to run multiple IPs for single network card in freebsd
>
>
OK. A better question. About the only caution I can give here (assuming
you don't mean something more interesting like vlans and whatnot) is that
if both IP addresses are
Kindly will u give me example with cammand line, which can test on my
freebsd machine, i want two ips 192.168.1.100 and 192.169.1.100 to be work
on single network interface, my default interface for network is arge0
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 a
For the introduction, I filed a PR for this at beginning of 2012 and
suffered from the very same problem close to two years before on ALL
FreeBSD versions and platforms using OpenLDAP as the user backend:
ports/164239: [PATCH] mail/thunderbird: crash with nss_ldap
Even with the suggested patch by
Am 03/09/13 10:07, schrieb Hartmann, O.:
> For the introduction, I filed a PR for this at beginning of 2012 and
> suffered from the very same problem close to two years before on ALL
> FreeBSD versions and platforms using OpenLDAP as the user backend:
>
> ports/164239: [PATCH] mail/thunderbird: cr
Hi,
Just updated to the latest CURRENT. Got this during boot:
(sorry for the large image)
http://mirror.vnode.se/upload/r248090_panic.jpg
--
Joel
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 10:39:20AM +0100, Joel Dahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just updated to the latest CURRENT. Got this during boot:
> (sorry for the large image)
>
> http://mirror.vnode.se/upload/r248090_panic.jpg
This is fixed with r248093.
--
Joel
___
f
On CURRENT, r248093, build of kernel fails due to the below shown error.
[...]
cc -c -O3 -O3 -Wno-error=unused-variable -fno-strict-aliasing
-march=native -std=c99 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wn
Hi,
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 03:04:00 -0500
Yasir hussan wrote:
> i just want to run multiple IPs for single network card in freebsd
it should work with alias of ifconfig
Erich
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Yasir hussan
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know usage of multi-homing in fr
Going by Zaphod's recommendation of using a /32 for each IP, how about this?
ifconfig arge0 inet 192.168.1.100/32
ifconfig arge0 alias 192.169.1.100/32
I wouldn't recommend 192.169, though - only 192.168.x.x is reserved
for private networks, and 192.169 is a valid IP-routable prefix,
assigned to
i want to have differnet ips`s and each should have different interface, it
could be a virtual interface. like u can made it like
*ifconfig arge0.1 create*
but each ip should able to access from differnet machine
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> Going by Zaphod's recommen
TB --- 2013-03-09 11:30:25 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-09 11:30:25 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On Mar 8, 2013 9:44 PM, "KT Sin" wrote:
>
> pw is crashing with seg fault due to this change?
>
>
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libutil/gr_util.c?r1=245390&r2=247919
I think the correct fix is committed with:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248102
Hiren
>
> # gdb ./pw
> GNU gd
Am 03/09/13 15:34, schrieb hiren panchasara:
> On Mar 8, 2013 9:44 PM, "KT Sin" wrote:
>>
>> pw is crashing with seg fault due to this change?
>>
>>
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libutil/gr_util.c?r1=245390&r2=247919
>
> I think the correct fix is committed with:
> http://svnweb.freeb
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 11:59:21AM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On CURRENT, r248093, build of kernel fails due to the below shown error.
>
> [...]
>
> cc -c -O3 -O3 -Wno-error=unused-variable -fno-strict-aliasing
> ...
> -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -fstack-protector -Werror
>
saw the commit an hour ago. rebuilt libutil.so.9 and unfortunately it still
crashes for me :(
--- On Sat, 3/9/13, hiren panchasara wrote:
From: hiren panchasara
Subject: Re: pw is broken?
To: kt...@acm.org
Cc: "freebsd-current"
Date: Saturday, March 9, 2013, 10:34 PM
On Mar 8, 2013 9:44 PM
On 09.03.13 15:52, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Am 03/09/13 15:34, schrieb hiren panchasara:
>> On Mar 8, 2013 9:44 PM, "KT Sin" wrote:
>>>
>>> pw is crashing with seg fault due to this change?
>>>
>>>
>> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/lib/libutil/gr_util.c?r1=245390&r2=247919
>>
>> I think the corr
ah, this is a different problem. one quick workaround is to comment out the
unused variable ic :P, or you could include INVARIANTS in your kernel config,
or you could ping adrian :)
--- On Sat, 3/9/13, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>
> But neither r248102 nor r248103 compile!
>
> /usr/src/sys/net80211
ah. my apologies. rebuilt the new libutil again and it seems that r248012 does
indeed resolve the problem. :)
--- On Sat, 3/9/13, KT Sin wrote:
From: KT Sin
Subject: Re: pw is broken?
To: "hiren panchasara" , d...@freebsd.org
Cc: "freebsd-current"
Date: Saturday, March 9, 2013, 11:15 PM
saw
I have one specific FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
r248061: Fri Mar 8 19:44:30 CET 2013 amd64) which rejects to build
either lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 with the very same error shown below.
The box is compiled with CLANG (buildworld/kernel).
It doesn't matter whether I compile tho
On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:36 , "Hartmann, O." wrote:
> I have one specific FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
> r248061: Fri Mar 8 19:44:30 CET 2013 amd64) which rejects to build
> either lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 with the very same error shown below.
…
> checking whether cc supports -ped
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis via
/etc/src.conf setting of
PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver
but this time, the port gets deleted and - fails to compile (tried
310.32 and 313.26, the latter worked for me before very well).
The compilation err
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:31:
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis via
/etc/src.conf setting of
PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver
I answered to your pr. Did you tried that?
"""
If I understand correctly, it should be fixed in r248061 (F
Am 03/09/13 17:38, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
> Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:31:
>> I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis via
>> /etc/src.conf setting of
>>
>> PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver
>
> I answered to your pr. Did you tried that?
>
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:45:
Am 03/09/13 17:38, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:31:
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis via
/etc/src.conf setting of
PORTS_MODULES+=x11/nvidia-driver
I answered to yo
Am 03/09/13 17:02, schrieb Dimitry Andric:
> On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:36 , "Hartmann, O." wrote:
>> I have one specific FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
>> r248061: Fri Mar 8 19:44:30 CET 2013 amd64) which rejects to build
>> either lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 with the very same error sh
Am 03/09/13 17:46, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
> Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:45:
>> Am 03/09/13 17:38, schrieb Ruslan Makhmatkhanov:
>>> Hartmann, O. wrote on 09.03.2013 20:31:
I rebuild the kernel module for x11/nvidia-driver on a regular basis
via
/etc/src.conf setting of
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:06:05PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> ...
> No, it isn't. Same error, system is at revision:
> FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r248106: Sat Mar 9 16:44:58 CET 2013 amd64
>
> The error is the same.
> ...
Please see the message I posted to ports@, a copy of which may be found
at
TB --- 2013-03-09 13:41:12 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-09 13:41:12 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
TB --- 2013-03-09 16:50:38 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-09 16:50:38 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
Oh, you specifically need them to have different interfaces? That's a
bit more complicated. I guess you could rig something with netgraph
(ngctl and such), but I'm not familiar with it...
--
Daniel Nebdal
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Yasir hussan wrote:
> i want to have differnet ips`s and ea
This one was fixed.
Adrian
On 9 March 2013 09:56, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2013-03-09 16:50:38 - tinderbox 2.10 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2013-03-09 16:50:38 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
> FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT
Am 03/09/13 18:07, schrieb David Wolfskill:
> On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 06:06:05PM +0100, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> ...
>> No, it isn't. Same error, system is at revision:
>> FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r248106: Sat Mar 9 16:44:58 CET 2013 amd64
>>
>> The error is the same.
>> ...
>
> Please see the messa
On 2013-03-09 10:25, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> Am 03/09/13 10:07, schrieb Hartmann, O.:
>> For the introduction, I filed a PR for this at beginning of 2012 and
>> suffered from the very same problem close to two years before on ALL
>> FreeBSD versions and platforms using OpenLDAP as the user backend:
>
Am 03/09/13 23:21, schrieb Per olof Ljungmark:
> On 2013-03-09 10:25, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> Am 03/09/13 10:07, schrieb Hartmann, O.:
>>> For the introduction, I filed a PR for this at beginning of 2012 and
>>> suffered from the very same problem close to two years before on ALL
>>> FreeBSD version
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 05:02:56PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On Mar 9, 2013, at 16:36 , "Hartmann, O." wrote:
> > I have one specific FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box (FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0
> > r248061: Fri Mar 8 19:44:30 CET 2013 amd64) which rejects to build
> > either lang/gcc or lang/gcc46 wit
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Yasir hussan wrote:
> i want to have differnet ips`s and each should have different interface,
> it could be a virtual interface. like u can made it like
>
> *ifconfig arge0.1 create*
>
> but each ip should able to access from differnet machine
>
>
This is linux-sp
With the changing of the vm_object mutex to a rwlock, the VirtualBox
drivers (emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod) need the attached patch to run,
imb
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-curren
On 03/09/13 21:58, Michael Butler wrote:
> With the changing of the vm_object mutex to a rwlock, the VirtualBox
> drivers (emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod) need the attached patch to run,
>
> imb
*** src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/memobj-r0drv-freebsd.c~ Sat Mar
9 21:15:12 2013
--- src
TB --- 2013-03-10 03:10:26 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-03-10 03:10:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
if I break the build again before bsdcan, I promise I'll buy a nice
bottle of scotch and distribute small quantities to developers who
ask.
Adrian
On 9 March 2013 20:38, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Author: adrian
> Date: Sun Mar 10 04:38:06 2013
> New Revision: 248127
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.o
42 matches
Mail list logo
