Re: newbus' ivar's limitation..

2012-07-12 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > I'm sorry you feel that way. > > Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that the > N:1 interface that you want is being done in the wrong domain. But I've been > wrong before and look forward to seeing your re

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2012-07-12 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-07-12 06:10:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-07-12 06:10:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-12 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi, On behalf of the pkgng team I'm really pleased to announce pkg 1.0 RC1 (aka pkgng) Only bug fixes will be accepted in the RC phase. What is pkg --- pkg is a new package manager for FreeBSD. It is designed as a replacement for the pkg_* tools, and as a full featured binary package ma

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-12 Thread Alberto Villa
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Third party tools > - > > Tools supporting natively pkgng > - ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel (soon the main portupgrade will support) > - ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves > - ports-mgmt/poudriere > - ports-mgmt/portdowngra

Re: newbus' ivar's limitation..

2012-07-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 3:01:36 am Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > > I'm sorry you feel that way. > > > > Honestly, though, I think you'll be more pissed when you find out that the N:1 interface that you want is being done in the wrong dom

Re: newbus' ivar's limitation..

2012-07-12 Thread Warner Losh
On Jul 12, 2012, at 6:01 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > New-bus is certainly not the only way to organize a device hierarchy and is > not perfect, but in your case I suggest you tone down your language until you > have enough information to develop an informed opinion. It is also not the only way to

Adding support for WC (write-combining) memory to bus_dma

2012-07-12 Thread John Baldwin
I have a need to allocate static DMA memory via bus_dmamem_alloc() that is also WC (for a PCI-e device so it can use "nosnoop" transactions). This is similar to what the nvidia driver needs, but in my case it is much cleaner to allocate the memory via bus dma since the existing code I am extend

Re: Adding support for WC (write-combining) memory to bus_dma

2012-07-12 Thread Ian Lepore
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:40 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > I have a need to allocate static DMA memory via bus_dmamem_alloc() that is > also WC (for a PCI-e device so it can use "nosnoop" transactions). This is > similar to what the nvidia driver needs, but in my case it is much cleaner to > allo

Re: Adding support for WC (write-combining) memory to bus_dma

2012-07-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 11:02:07 am Ian Lepore wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:40 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > I have a need to allocate static DMA memory via bus_dmamem_alloc() that is > > also WC (for a PCI-e device so it can use "nosnoop" transactions). This is > > similar to what the

[CFT] ng_nptv6 (IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation)

2012-07-12 Thread HIROSHI OOTA
Hi, all I have created a netgraph node which performs a IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Prefix Translation(RFC6296). It works with ipfw(ng_ipfw). a sample configuration is follows. 1 setup netgraph ngctl mkpeer ipfw: nptv6 1000 inbound ngctl name ipfw:1000 nptv6 ngctl connect ipfw: nptv6: 2000

Re: Adding support for WC (write-combining) memory to bus_dma

2012-07-12 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Ian Lepore wrote: To be clear, I'm not objecting to your proposed changes, I'm more just musing that similar problems exist in non-x86 architectures and maybe an MI solution is possible (or at least the groundwork could be laid)? I was likewise going to comment that ther

Re: Adding support for WC (write-combining) memory to bus_dma

2012-07-12 Thread Scott Long
- Original Message - > From: John Baldwin > To: curr...@freebsd.org > Cc: sco...@freebsd.org; Peter Jeremy > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 7:40 AM > Subject: Adding support for WC (write-combining) memory to bus_dma > > I have a need to allocate static DMA memory via bus_dmamem_alloc

[HEADSUP] OpenSSL 1.0.1c merge in progress

2012-07-12 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OpenSSL 1.0.1c will be merged to head today. There will be several important changes to note. - - Several crypto/engine modules will be added or enabled by default to closely match OpenSSL default, e.g., Camellia (crypto), SEED (crypto), CHIL (engine

Re: Adding support for WC (write-combining) memory to bus_dma

2012-07-12 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, July 12, 2012 12:37:13 pm Scott Long wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: John Baldwin > > To: curr...@freebsd.org > > Cc: sco...@freebsd.org; Peter Jeremy > > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 7:40 AM > > Subject: Adding support for WC (write-combining) memory to bus_dma >

Re: [HEADSUP] OpenSSL 1.0.1c merge in progress

2012-07-12 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-12 14:04:58 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > - Several crypto/engine modules will be added or enabled by default > to closely match OpenSSL default, e.g., Camellia (crypto), SEED > (crypto), CHIL (engine), GOST (engine), etc. Actually, CHIL is a

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-12 Thread Doug Barton
I do not mean this e-mail to be in any way critical. I was told after the new OPTIONS framework discussion that I should have asked questions before the change, so I'm asking these questions now; in a genuine attempt to get information. On 07/12/2012 03:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: In the tim

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article <20120712100110.ga34...@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>, b...@freebsd.org writes: > - puppet support: (https://github.com/xaque208/puppet-pkgng) I've actually already written one of these; it may be good to merge. Would whoever is working on this please raise your hand? -GAWollman -- Garrett

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-07-12 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-07-12 20:13:29 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-07-12 20:13:29 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-07-12 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-07-12 20:28:59 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-07-12 20:28:59 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2012-07-12 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-07-12 20:43:02 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-07-12 20:43:02 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-12 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Doug Barton wrote: > 1. What are the goals for pkg? > 2. Why can't the existing tools fulfill those goals? > 3. How does pkg fulfill them? > > Hi, You might want to view Baptiste's pkgng presentation at BSDCan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Hxq7AHZ27I For me

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/12/2012 02:11 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > You might want to view Baptiste's pkgng presentation at BSDCan: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Hxq7AHZ27I Sure, the next time I have an hour to spare. I don't think what I'm asking for is unreasonable. One could even conclude that answering t

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-12 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:48:41AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > I do not mean this e-mail to be in any way critical. I was told after > the new OPTIONS framework discussion that I should have asked questions > before the change, so I'm asking these questions now; in a genuine > attempt to get inform

Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-12 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/12/2012 03:02 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:48:41AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> I do not mean this e-mail to be in any way critical. I was told after >> the new OPTIONS framework discussion that I should have asked questions >> before the change, so I'm asking th

Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions

2012-07-12 Thread Attilio Rao
2012/7/4 Attilio Rao : > 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao : >> As already published several times, according to the following plan: >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS >> > > I still haven't heard from Vivien or Edward, anyway as NTFS is > basically only used RO these days (also the mount_ntfs co

Re: Adding support for WC (write-combining) memory to bus_dma

2012-07-12 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2012-Jul-12 10:40:27 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >contigmalloc(). In fact, even better is to call kmem_alloc_contig() directly >rather than using contigmalloc(). ... >Peter, this is somewhat orthognal (but related) to your bus_dma patch which is >what prompted me to post this. Overall, the cha

panic with DEBUG_MEMGUARD on PowerPC

2012-07-12 Thread Justin Hibbits
When tracking down a panic exposed by INVARIANTS, I tried setting DEBUG_MEMGUARD, so I could find the culprit that's trashing freed memory. However, this causes a panic at bootup. It shows up right after the first WARNING: WITNESS message, with the following: panic: kmem_suballoc: bad sta

Re: [HEADSUP] OpenSSL 1.0.1c merge in progress

2012-07-12 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-12 14:04:58 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > OpenSSL 1.0.1c will be merged to head today. There will be > several important changes to note. > > - Several crypto/engine modules will be added or enabled by default > to closely match OpenSSL defa

Re: panic with DEBUG_MEMGUARD on PowerPC

2012-07-12 Thread mdf
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote: > When tracking down a panic exposed by INVARIANTS, I tried setting > DEBUG_MEMGUARD, so I could find the culprit that's trashing freed memory. > However, this causes a panic at bootup. It shows up right after the first > WARNING: WITNESS mes

Re: panic with DEBUG_MEMGUARD on PowerPC

2012-07-12 Thread Justin Hibbits
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:11 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote: When tracking down a panic exposed by INVARIANTS, I tried setting DEBUG_MEMGUARD, so I could find the culprit that's trashing freed memory. However, this causes a panic at bootup. It

Re: panic with DEBUG_MEMGUARD on PowerPC

2012-07-12 Thread mdf
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote: > On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:11 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Justin Hibbits >> wrote: >>> >>> When tracking down a panic exposed by INVARIANTS, I tried setting >>> DEBUG_MEMGUARD, so I could find the culprit th