stable/8 build seems to be broken for me on head without WITH_CTF:
...
cc -c -x assembler-with-cpp -DLOCORE -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=k8
-std=c99 -g -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef
-Wno-p
The subject should have been what it is now, sorry.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:27:36 +0300
Alexander Motin wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:07:38 +0300
> > Alexander Motin wrote:
> >> Yes, as I have said, at this moment empty ticks skipped only while CPU
> >> is in C2/C3 states. In C1 state there is no way to handle lost even
Alexander Motin wrote:
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:11:48 +0200
>> OK, this is purely anecdotal, but I'll report it anyway.
>>
>> I was running pretty much all day with the patched kernel and things
>> seemed to be working quite well.
>>
>> Then, after about 7 hours, everything
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 00:21, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Hi,
> The DTrace userland project is near completion and you can start using parts
> of it right away (only on FreeBSD HEAD right now).
>
> For more information on how to use DTrace with userland, please read:
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace/userl
On 1 Sep 2010, at 11:20, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 00:21, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The DTrace userland project is near completion and you can start using parts
>> of it right away (only on FreeBSD HEAD right now).
>>
>> For more information on how to use DTrace with use
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:57, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 1 Sep 2010, at 11:20, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 00:21, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> The DTrace userland project is near completion and you can start using
>>> parts of it right away (only on FreeBSD HEAD right now).
>>
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:26 +0300
Alexander Motin wrote:
> Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:11:48 +0200
> >> OK, this is purely anecdotal, but I'll report it anyway.
> >>
> >> I was running pretty much all day with the patched kernel and things
> >> se
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:26 +0300
> Alexander Motin wrote:
>> I have reproduced the problem locally. It happens more often when ticks
>> are not stopped on idle, like in your original case (or if explicitly
>> enabled by kern.eventtimer.idletick sysctl).
>>
>> I've made so
On 01.09.2010 01:13, ben wilber wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded from r210042 to r212073 and keep getting the panic
introduced in r211317:
panic: tcp_output: len<= tso_segsz
Please try the attached patch and report back whether it
fixes the issue.
I'm a bit in a hurry right now and can respond aga
On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:53:12 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, wrote:
> > I recorded the stack any time ts->ts_cpu was set and when a thread was
> > migrated by sched_switch() I printed out the recorded info. Here's
> > what I found:
> >
> >
> > XXX bug 67957:
Quoting Alexander Motin (from Sun, 29 Aug 2010
16:10:00 +0300):
I have actively tested this code for a few days on my amd64 Core2Duo
laptop and i386 Core-i5 desktop system. With C2/C3 states enabled
systems experience only about 100-150 interrupts per second, having HZ
set to 1000. These even
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Alexander Motin (from Sun, 29 Aug 2010
> 16:10:00 +0300):
>
>> I have actively tested this code for a few days on my amd64 Core2Duo
>> laptop and i386 Core-i5 desktop system. With C2/C3 states enabled
>> systems experience only about 100-150 interrupts per sec
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 16:59:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
> teddy bear, so be warned. Don't try it for anyt
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010, Buganini wrote:
BTW, it seems that DVD burning with ahci is broken, burning a CD is
okay, but I never burn a DVD sucessfully with ahci. Always get
somethings like "unable to wr...@60h input/output error" and many
"(cd0:ahcich2:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST csi:43,0,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:15:41 +0200
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:26 +0300
> Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Updated patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/timers_oneshot6.patch
> >
> > Patch also includes some optimizations to reduce lock contention.
> >
> > Thanks for testing.
>
Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:15:41 +0200
> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:26 +0300
>> Alexander Motin wrote:
>>> Updated patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/timers_oneshot6.patch
>>>
>>> Patch also includes some optimizations to reduce lock contention.
>>
Just want to draw attention of those who use ahci, have hald running and burn
optical media to couple of known issues:
1.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.gnome/29636/focus=29652
2.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.scsi/5128
3. k3b (and k3b-kde4) has a bug in its inter
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:49 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:53:12 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, wrote:
>> > I recorded the stack any time ts->ts_cpu was set and when a thread was
>> > migrated by sched_switch() I printed out the recorded
m...@freebsd.org wrote:
[snip]
I will test this patch out; thanks for the help!
Two questions:
1) How does a thread get moved between CPUs when it's not running? I
see that we change the runqueue for non-running threads that are on a
runqueue. Does the code always check for THREAD_CAN_SCHED w
On Wednesday, September 01, 2010 12:54:13 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:49 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 31, 2010 2:53:12 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, wrote:
> >> > I recorded the stack any time ts->ts_cpu was set and
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Alexander Motin wrote:
>> Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:11:48 +0200
>>> OK, this is purely anecdotal, but I'll report it anyway.
>>>
>>> I was running pretty much all day with the patched kernel and things
>>> seemed to be
< said:
> Just want to draw attention of those who use ahci, have hald running and burn
> optical media to couple of known issues:
What about those of us who use ahci, don't have hald running, and just
want to read their DVDs? I never heard any response from you when I
asked for a more specific
Brandon Gooch wrote:
> This latest patch causes an interrupt storm with the HPET timer on my
> system. The machine took about 8 minutes to boot and bring me to a
> login prompt. System interactivity (i.e. input from keyboard, output
> on console) was fine, but after checking the output of `systat v
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2010 17:59, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
> teddy bear, so
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Important note. Please patch with the following command:
# patch -E -p0 < z
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/09/01 07:28, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2010 16:59:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
>> mad, you can stop here.
>>
>> The patchset is very expe
On Sep 1, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 01.09.2010 01:13, ben wilber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just upgraded from r210042 to r212073 and keep getting the panic
>> introduced in r211317:
>>
>> panic: tcp_output: len<= tso_segsz
>
> Please try the attached patch and report back whethe
On 09/01/2010 10:28, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2010 16:59:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
>> mad, you can stop here.
>>
>> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
>>
Hello there,
I am looking for volunteers who are interested in writing
documentation, i.e. working with the FreeBSD Handbook and the
documentation set. Many of our great documentation writers have
decided to retire from their work over the last years, which means the
FreeBSD Documentation Project
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Brandon Gooch wrote:
>> This latest patch causes an interrupt storm with the HPET timer on my
>> system. The machine took about 8 minutes to boot and bring me to a
>> login prompt. System interactivity (i.e. input from keyboard, output
>> on
I will soon commit a change to the NFS diskless client code
in the kernel in preparation for the commits that will make
pxeboot use NFSv3 instead of NFSv2.
If you build a kernel with this nfs_diskless.c commit but do
not replace pxeboot and the loader, it should work, but will
use NFSv2 for the ro
On 02.09.2010 00:11, ben wilber wrote:
On Sep 1, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 01.09.2010 01:13, ben wilber wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded from r210042 to r212073 and keep getting the panic
introduced in r211317:
panic: tcp_output: len<= tso_segsz
Please try the attached patch an
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:46 PM, Gabor PALI wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I am looking for volunteers who are interested in writing
> documentation, i.e. working with the FreeBSD Handbook and the
> documentation set. Many of our great documentation writers have
> decided to retire from their work ove
34 matches
Mail list logo
