Re: New IPv6 settings in rc.conf

On Sunday 25 April 2010 02:55:16 Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/24/10 17:54, Bruce Cran wrote: > > # if_bridge doesn't have a link-local address by default, so add one > > ifconfig_bridge0_ipv6="fe80::2%bridge0 prefixlen 64" > > It's likely that you need to add inet6 before fe80 there: > ifconfig_bri

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

AK-san, PseudoCylon wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you for all the info. > This one shall work. > http://projects.nasreddine.com/projects/run/repository/revisions/mips_fix/show/dev/usb/wlan > Please update if_run.c and if_runvar.h (2 files). > > Just in case, after kldload, please issue > # sysctl hw.u

usb/da vs sata geometry calculations (was Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?)

Hi all, Sorry to interrupt this thread with an off-topic question, but it seems vaguely related, and you folk seem to be the right ones to ask: I've recently done a drive upgrade in a 1U rack machine that only had space for the two active drives that were in it, and I couldn't afford the down-tim

Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now

Roman Divacky schrieb am 2010-04-24: > ping any progress on this? :) sorry it took some time, but i've been rather busy. i was able to pinpoint the exact function which is causing the problem: it's snd_xbytes(). [snip] > > > Great stuff to have narrowed it down so much. Next logical step >

Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?

Jaakko Heinonen schrieb am 2010-04-23: > On 2010-04-23, Alexander Best wrote: > > has anybody thought about adding scsi support to burncd(8)? i've > > been using > > ATA CAM for quite a while now and really love it. however i miss > > burncd(8). > I have thought about it. The mail I posted in Dece

sysinstall core dumps when using gsched

There seems to be something about the conftxt that geom produces when gsched is being used that libdisk doesn't like. sysinstall segfaults on startup when it's being used, with a NULL pointer being passed to strchr in open_disk.c:55 (Int_Open_Disk). -- Bruce Cran __

Re: kern+world / ports make options

On Sat, 24.04.2010 at 16:42:37 +, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote: > Hello Hackers & Current, > > I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a separate > set > of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel > independently of a ports build? > > Righ

Re: HEADS UP: SUJ Going in to head today

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:57:59 -1000 (HST) Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote: > > > try in single user mode: > > > > tunefs -j enable / > > tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal > > tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled > > > > tunefs -j enable /dev/a

State of tun(4) in -CURRENT? No buffer space available

Hello, I'm running r203753 (i386) for some time on my IPv6 router. This box uses net/sixxs-aiccu to establish an IPv6 tunnel to one of the SixXS POPs. Unfortunately, tun(4) interface exhibits strange behaviour: after some traffic burst (like opening a ncurses application via ssh) the interface st

Re: kern+world / ports make options

On Sunday 25 April 2010 11:17:40 Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > On Sat, 24.04.2010 at 16:42:37 +, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote: > > It may already be implemented, but it would be nice if there was > > something defined while the kernel and/or world is being built to that a > > nested block of ifdefs c

Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?

On Apr 25, 2010, at 4:23 AM, Alexander Best wrote: > Jaakko Heinonen schrieb am 2010-04-23: >> On 2010-04-23, Alexander Best wrote: >>> has anybody thought about adding scsi support to burncd(8)? i've >>> been using >>> ATA CAM for quite a while now and really love it. however i miss >>> burncd(8).

Re: HEADS UP: SUJ Going in to head today

On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote: > >> try in single user mode: >> >> tunefs -j enable / >> tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal >> tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled >> >> tunefs -j enable /dev/ad0s2a >> tunefs: In

Re: HEADS UP: SUJ Going in to head today

On Sunday 25 April 2010 19:47:00 Scott Long wrote: > On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote: > >> try in single user mode: > >> > >> tunefs -j enable / > >> tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal > >> tunefs: soft updates journaling can no

Re: Call for Test and Review: bwn(4) - another Broadcom Wireless driver

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> I've been testing the driver for a few time with AMD64/CURRENT. A >> few time ago I started to see messages like : >> >> bwn0: unsupported rate 0 >> >> I've checked the code and I found it seems to fail when trying to >> check the TX rate at if_bw.

Re: HEADS UP: SUJ Going in to head today

Hi Jeff, thank you for your effort in implementing the soft update journaling. I tried to test SUJ on a provider with 4 kB block size. My system runs 9-CURRENT r207195 (i386). Unfortunately, tunefs is unable to cope with the device. It can easily reproduced with these steps: # mdconfig -s 128M -S

Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

On 04/19/10 02:30, Alexander Motin wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 18 Apr 2010, at 14:05, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> Most of AHCI controllers could also work as usual PCI ATA, but not every >>> PCI ATA could work as AHCI. It would be nice to compare `pciconf -lvbc` >>> output in both working (Rui)

Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?

On 04/25/10 03:23, Alexander Best wrote: > another option would be to have a ata(4)->cam(4)->ata(4) emulation. What would be the value of doing all of that work as opposed to just using one of the available options that already work with cam such as cdrecord? Doug -- ... and that's j

Re: New IPv6 settings in rc.conf

On 04/25/10 00:00, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Sunday 25 April 2010 02:55:16 Doug Barton wrote: >> On 04/24/10 17:54, Bruce Cran wrote: > >>> # if_bridge doesn't have a link-local address by default, so add one >>> ifconfig_bridge0_ipv6="fe80::2%bridge0 prefixlen 64" >> >> It's likely that you need to

Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?

On Apr 25, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/25/10 03:23, Alexander Best wrote: >> another option would be to have a ata(4)->cam(4)->ata(4) emulation. > > What would be the value of doing all of that work as opposed to just > using one of the available options that already work with ca

Re: Switchover to CAM ATA?

On 04/25/10 19:03, Scott Long wrote: > On Apr 25, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 04/25/10 03:23, Alexander Best wrote: >>> another option would be to have a ata(4)->cam(4)->ata(4) >>> emulation. >> >> What would be the value of doing all of that work as opposed to >> just using one of

Re: New IPv6 settings in rc.conf

On Monday 26 April 2010 03:01:39 Doug Barton wrote: > On 04/25/10 00:00, Bruce Cran wrote: > > On Sunday 25 April 2010 02:55:16 Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 04/24/10 17:54, Bruce Cran wrote: > >>> # if_bridge doesn't have a link-local address by default, so add one > >>> ifconfig_bridge0_ipv6="fe80::