On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Jun Su wrote:
> I am adding some new feature to the kgdb. I am not sure why the libkvm doesn't
> implement reading from memory space when checking core dump. Who can give
> some comments on this? If it is possible, I will try to implement it.
It was lost when libkvm was conver
On Sunday 02 March 2003 17:12, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Jun Su wrote:
> > I am adding some new feature to the kgdb. I am not sure why the libkvm
> > doesn't implement reading from memory space when checking core dump. Who
> > can give some comments on this? If it is possible, I will
Can you run a small test? Can you build a kernel w/o wi? Further,
can you do
sysctl hw.pccard.cis_debug=1
before you insert the card (or put the hw=1 part in
/boot/loader.conf) and send me the result?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curre
I installed the /usr/ports/comms/mgetty+sendfax to get my
new servers functions completed and found after installing the
port and giving a kill -HUP 1 - the port adds the
line
cuaa0 "/usr/local/sbin/mgetty" unknown on insecure
to /etc/ttys.
After that the system was hosed. After rebooting
the sy
Hi,
(Trying to boot an alternate kernel on FreeBSD/i386 with normal loader running
at a console, loading kernel from a disk.)
It looks like after I "unload" the default kernel, and try to "load" a new
one, when I go to "boot", loader is trying to load some other kernel, and
I'm not sure why, but
This may already be fixed..can you try updating and see if the problem persists?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Kris Kennaway wrote:
--6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
This may already be fixed..can you try updating and see if the problem persists?
Yes. I've also had problems with my laptop freezing when using
gtk-gnutella. After the fixes (I'm now at
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 12:25, Donn Miller wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > --6sX45UoQRIJXqkqR
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > This may already be fixed..can you try updating and see if the problem persists?
>
> Yes. I've also had problems wi
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Jens Rehsack wrote:
JR>Barney Wolff wrote:
JR>> This is an example of what I was pointing out:
JR>>
JR>> On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:53:33AM +0100, Jens Rehsack wrote:
JR>> ...
JR>>
JR>>>@@ -1444,22 +1420,19 @@
JR>>> *none- response sent
JR>>> *
JR>>> */
JR>>>-vo
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> I just tried using my FreeBSD laptop to unload pictures off of a 340MB IBM
> microdrive (Model: DMDM-10340, P/N: 22L0046) using the IBM PC Card adapter
> (P/N: 31L9315). The laptop in question is a stock Dell Latitude C800 with
> a 1Ghz P3, 512M
Imagine you decided to go with modular kernel. You comment out 'device
random' in your kernel-config and place 'random_load="YES"' in
/boot/loader.conf. When you reboot and don't rebuild the kernel first, you
have your machine unbootable - at least in case you previously had acpi in
your kernel and
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> > My main concern would be if the chips have the necessary "umphf"
> > to actually do a real-world job once they're done running all the
> > overhead of 5.0-R. The lack of cmpxchg8 makes the locking horribl
Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> I installed the /usr/ports/comms/mgetty+sendfax to get my
> new servers functions completed and found after installing the
> port and giving a kill -HUP 1 - the port adds the
> line
> cuaa0 "/usr/local/sbin/mgetty" unknown on insecure
> to /etc/ttys.
>
> After that the
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> > My main concern would be if the chips have the necessary "umphf"
>> > to actually do a real-world job once they're done running all the
>> > overhea
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 04:09:34AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> This may already be fixed..can you try updating and see if the problem persists?
>
> Kris
I got it again right after the client checks for new version. The world is about
1.5hrs old.
Attached the kernel dump
Jiawei Ye
--
"With
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >> On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> > My main concern would be if the chips have the necessary "umphf"
> >> > to actually do a real-world job once they're don
As the subject says,
i noticed it while i was compiling kdebase-3, cause
ksysguard failed.
Add
#include
to devstat.h to fix it.
I hope i did it right... =P
--
Paolo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Изготовление стильных сайтов любого уровня
сложности и их поддержка. Цены от 500 до 5000 USD. Работают только
профессионалы (не студенты). Реклама в интернете.
т. (095)
275-49-84
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
< said:
> Interestingly, socreate() in Lite2 always does a can-wait malloc() so
> our current soalloc(M_NOWAIT) does the same thing as Lite2 and is only
> wrong if the FreeBSD change from can-wait to "can-wait-if p != 0"
> change was needed and is still needed.
When I initially revamped that code
I plan to commit
http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/cdevsw.patch
one of the first days of the week.
Basically, it changes cdevsw initializations to use C99 sparse
format, and thereby eliminates 859 lines of redundant defaultvalue
initializations.
After this patch has been committed, we will be
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:14:13PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I plan to commit
> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/cdevsw.patch
> one of the first days of the week.
>
> Basically, it changes cdevsw initializations to use C99 sparse
> format, and thereby eliminates 859 lines of redundant
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Moolenaar writes
:
>On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:14:13PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> I plan to commit
>> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/cdevsw.patch
>> one of the first days of the week.
>>
>> Basically, it changes cdevsw initializations to use C99
-
Floppy FTP install:
4.8-PreRelease works fine, but with CURRENT my laptop bogs down in the
FTP get stage... Alternatively, it also doesn't find the CDROM drive
after the boot stage of the install process. The only way I've gotten
it to install is to copy the CDROM image to another UFS pa
Dear Poul-Henning,
i think the following is not correct
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netgraph/ng_device.c,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 ng_device.c
--- netgraph/ng_device.c2 Feb 2003 13:30:00 - 1.2
+++ netgraph/ng_device.c2 Mar 2003 19:48:38 -
@@ -66,7 +66,
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:26:31PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Moolenaar writes
> :
> >On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:14:13PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >>
> >> I plan to commit
> >>http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/cdevsw.patch
> >> one of the first d
Dear Hackers,
< said:
> > Interestingly, socreate() in Lite2 always does a can-wait malloc() so
> > our current soalloc(M_NOWAIT) does the same thing as Lite2 and is only
> > wrong if the FreeBSD change from can-wait to "can-wait-if p != 0"
> > change was needed and is still needed.
>
> When I i
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Moolenaar writes
:
>On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:26:31PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Moolenaar writes
>> :
>> >On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:14:13PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I plan to commit
>> >>
Hi list,
I'm still trying to get this drive working. I booted with a -v flag, and
this the output now: Can anyone recommend any changes or patches to get
this to work work? My kernel is 5.0-currrent built on March 1st.
Thank you,
Pat Lathem
umass0: SCM Microsystems Inc. eUSB MultiMediaCard Adap
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:14:13PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I plan to commit
http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/cdevsw.patch
one of the first days of the week.
Basically, it changes cdevsw initializations to use C99 sparse
format, and thereby eliminates 859 lines of
John Polstra writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This is wrong. caddr_t should be uniersally replaced with void *.
>
> Not quite. There is (or at least used to be) a lot of code that
> assumed you could do address arithmetic on a c
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 02:25:55PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>
> RE@ had in principal agreed with this work, since it will make 5-STABLE
> and 6-CURRENT more compatible.
That's all I wanted to know. Thanks,
--
Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: se
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M
aksim Yevmenkin" writes:
>Dear Poul-Henning,
>
>i think the following is not correct
>
>RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netgraph/ng_device.c,v
>retrieving revision 1.2
>diff -u -r1.2 ng_device.c
>--- netgraph/ng_device.c 2 Feb 2003 13:30:00 - 1.2
>+++
Dear John,
I am only trying to connect as a normal user.
telnet etaq3
and
telnet etaq3 22
and
telnet etaq3 25
all come right back disconnecting me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/wayne>telnet etaq3 25
Trying 192.168.0.12...
Connected to etaq3.etaq.com.
Escape character is '^]'.
Connect
From: "Paolo Pisati" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 2:24 PM
> i noticed it while i was compiling kdebase-3, cause
> ksysguard failed.
>
> Add
>
> #include
>
> to devstat.h to fix it.
FWIW, I had the same problem (and used the same solution) with a few other X
ports, particular
Mark Murray wrote:
John Polstra writes:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is wrong. caddr_t should be uniersally replaced with void *.
Not quite. There is (or at least used to be) a lot of code that
assumed you could do address arithmetic on a c
Practically 100% repeatable: after some CVS updates (not sure but it
seems after another high HD load as well) -CURRENT panics with
bwrite: buffer is not busy
(in the prefious message I've attached gdb trace and so on, and nothing
has changed so far).
It goes on for at least several days now.
Rega
>From dmesg.boot:
acpi_cpu: throttling enabled, 16 steps (100% to 6.2%), currently 100.0%
ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_ERROR
Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc04ff0a8.
Timecounter "
George Hartzell wrote:
> On boot I get "Loading GRUB... Please Wait..." but after that I get "GRUB
> Error 17" which according to the manual means that GRUB doesn't know how to
> load the selected partition. Even though when I boot from the floppy it
> starts no problem and I can type commands to
Hi Max,
> 1) compile and install hcidump from the snapshot's ports/ directory
Recompiled and reinstalled. All went fine.
> 2) make sure you have clean setup, i.e.
>- run # rc.bluetooth stop
>- disconnect the device from the PC
>- reset mouse
>- connect device back to PC
>-
Sorry, I know it is poor form to reply to myself.
I tried to do a "camcontrol reset all" while it was giving me this
error. Nothing appeared to happen (the error continued to scroll) so I
removed the USB device.
(probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command
(probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status 0
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: This particular sweep gives os much better cross-branch source
: portability and therefore I think it is exactly the kind of thing
: we want before the RELENG_5 branch.
I for one plan on MFC'ing the "NULL
I finally managed to get my hands on a couple of other Wireless network
cards (previously I had a DWL-650+ based on the unsupported TI chipset).
I have tried both cards to no avail on FreeBSD v4.7 and was wondering if
anyone has either working under Current?
The two cards are:
3Com OfficeConnect
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:07:28AM +, Suneel Jhangiani wrote:
> I finally managed to get my hands on a couple of other Wireless network
> cards (previously I had a DWL-650+ based on the unsupported TI chipset).
>
> I have tried both cards to no avail on FreeBSD v4.7 and was wondering if
> anyo
I have a patch that should clear up buf locking issues and race conditions
in vfs_cluster.c. Since this code is so tricky I'd like to have a few
people test it. You should notice no difference in your system
performance or behavior.
Please see: http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/cluster.diff
On Sunday 02 March 2003 18:08, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> Now, that OpenWatcom is released, the FreeBSd port of it should follow.
> And maybe someone will try to compile the kernel and world with it. If
> that would work, this would be great, because the watcom compiler
> generates much better code than
Ladies and Gentlemen
From a fresh cvsup of RELENG_5_0 this afternoon, make buildkernel
returns:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c:1078: warning: `npx_driver' defined but not
used
/usr/src/sys/i386/isa/npx.c:1084: warning: `npx_devclass' defined but not
use
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
-
Dear Jason,
[Not too many people jumping onto this thread to help me.]
The first two non-bold lines on rebooting, are:
hw.bus.devctl_disable: 0 -> 1
Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_point.
So I try:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/wayne>sysctl hw.bus.devctl_disable: 1 -> 0
[but
Dear FreeBSD,
Immediately after rebooting, I get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/wayne>telnetd -debug
telnetd: bind: Address already in use
This doesn't happen on my other (working) system.
Could this be a clue to my problem?
--
-- Wayne M Barnes, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubs
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Wayne Barnes wrote:
> Immediately after rebooting, I get this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/wayne>telnetd -debug
> telnetd: bind: Address already in use
>
> This doesn't happen on my other (working) system.
> Could this be a clue to my problem?
Wayne,
Telnetd is t
Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Wayne Barnes wrote:
> > Immediately after rebooting, I get this:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/wayne>telnetd -debug
> > telnetd: bind: Address already in use
> >
> > This doesn't happen on my other (working) system.
> > Could this be
Jens Rehsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course. Very often in ilmid.c the type caddr_t was used, and nearly
> the same count of 'const char *'s was used. I've searched the include
> files for caddr_t (core address) and found it defined as 'char *', so
> I decided to used commonly caddr_t - ma
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Jens Rehsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Of course. Very often in ilmid.c the type caddr_t was used, and nearly
the same count of 'const char *'s was used. I've searched the include
files for caddr_t (core address) and found it defined as 'char *', so
I decided to used c
Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes:
> Jens Rehsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Of course. Very often in ilmid.c the type caddr_t was used, and nearly
> > the same count of 'const char *'s was used. I've searched the include
> > files for caddr_t (core address) and found it defined as 'char *', so
> > I
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is wrong. caddr_t should be uniersally replaced with void *.
Not quite. There is (or at least used to be) a lot of code that
assumed you could do address arithmetic on a caddr_t. You can't do
that on a voi
Dear FreeBSD,
I have installed 5.0 into a new Dell. I have not set up anything
special yet (no firewall, no natd, etc.).
I can ssh out to the world, but I can't get into the new box from the
gateway FreeBSD box on the same home network. The gateway box properly
lists the new box in /etc
Quoting Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have installed 5.0 into a new Dell. I have not set up anything
> special yet (no firewall, no natd, etc.).
>
> I can ssh out to the world, but I can't get into the new box from the
> gateway FreeBSD box on the same home network. The gateway box pro
John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is wrong. caddr_t should be uniersally replaced with void *.
> Not quite. There is (or at least used to be) a lot of code that
> assumed you could do address arithmetic on a caddr_t. You can't do
58 matches
Mail list logo
