Mikko Työläjärvi wrote:
> > Probably the best thing to do would be to disassemble the BIOS on
> > your box, knowing the difference between the older driver's interface,
> > and use the same techniques that were hidden from the older driver
> > (and "just built in" instead).
>
> I doubt that would
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:31:48 +1100
Tim Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hashinit() can sleep, and I don't think it's safe to sleep here
> (msdosfs_hashget() and msdosfs_hashins()) with dehash_mtx and
> sometimes a vnode lock held.
Doh! I should have noticed that.
>
> It might be better t
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:33:41PM -0600, David Leimbach wrote the words in effect of:
> I am about to try to make some changes to FreeBSD current...
>
> Should I begin to use read-only CVS instead of CVSup for this work or
> is it possible to generate diffs based on CVSup'd sources?
>
> What is
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 22:48:31 -0500
Rahul Siddharthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To the OP -- any speed improvement from gcc 3.2.1 to 3.2.2 would
> probably be marginal. If some particular port really bothers you with
> its slow performance, try recompiling (though it's unlikely to help),
> othe
Hmmm, fails to build for me:
FreeBSD asus 5.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p1 #3: Mon Feb 10
10:39:34 CET 2003 root@asus:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ASUS i386
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc32/work/build/gcc'
for d in libgcc; do \
if [ -d $d ]; then true; else /bin/sh
.././
While doing heavy IO (updating my p4 repo) on my laptop I got the following
panic. (I was running in X so both backtrace and dmesg are from the core
dump after reboot)
I'm wondering whether the ENOMEM's reported by GEOM point out that GEOM
has a problem or just tell us that the machine was out of
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Santcroos writes:
>While doing heavy IO (updating my p4 repo) on my laptop I got the following
>panic. (I was running in X so both backtrace and dmesg are from the core
>dump after reboot)
>
>I'm wondering whether the ENOMEM's reported by GEOM point out that GE
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:21:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >#14 0xc01edc00 in spec_xstrategy (vp=0xc23046c0, bp=0xc7502da8) at
>../../../fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:596
>
> This doesn't correspond to my sourcefile, but you should examine this one.
Sorry, I should have do the backtrace on th
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mark Santcroos writes:
>596: DEV_STRATEGY(bp);
>
>I don't understand what you want me to examine there as the arguments are
>not usefull anymore (or are they?).
Well that line in my copy was not code, so I just wanted to see what
your sources said.
>> >#15 0xc01
Hi all,
I have a ar0 mirror with 120GB diskspace.
I don't know if this is a known problem yet, but I had done
the following steps which lead to a failure situation:
1.) Created a partition
2.) Created some slices
3.) Started a installation, abouted it because no net-device was
found.
4.) Re
Hello,
> He also has a login on the machine for testing but it's turned off at
> the moment I'll turn it on again if he asks.
I've already sent him a mail. BTW, is a simple login (I mean, for example
ssh) enough for this task? I would think at least a serial console access
is needed...
--
I have been watching this list and I have not seen much talk about the
stability of FreeBSD 5.0 (RELENG_5_0) or of its use as a server? I did see
that some people have upgraded their 4.7 servers to 5.0. Can anybody relate
their experience with the OS release? I am looking for cases in particular
Im running a CURRENT gateway at home with an iSDN line and a
wireless card in hostap mode. Hasn't missed a beat since I replaced
the previous (4.7) with DP2.
Lawrence Farr
EPC Direct Limited
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
> Tho
Hi all,
I experience strange problems with this Gigabit card. It attaches
correctly, but there is no activity until I set one time the
promiscous mode, after that it works.
So I wonder why this happens. Is something wrong with the filter ?
Maybe we just have to turn on/off promiscous mode in bg
Hi,
/etc/rc.d/named copies /dev with pax to the named chroot directory. This
is obviously wrong with devfs, isn't it?
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Where do you think you're going today?
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Attila Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > He also has a login on the machine for testing but it's turned off at
> > the moment I'll turn it on again if he asks.
> I've already sent him a mail. BTW, is a simple login (I mean, for example
> ssh) enough for this task? I would think at
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
I have been watching this list and I have not seen much talk about the
stability of FreeBSD 5.0 (RELENG_5_0) or of its use as a server? I
did see
that some people have upgraded their 4.7 servers to 5.0. Can anybody
relate
their experience with the OS release? I am
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 06:59:31PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> /etc/rc.d/named copies /dev with pax to the named chroot directory. This
> is obviously wrong with devfs, isn't it?
>
/etc/rc.d/named is quite bogus, especially when it comes to running bind
chrooted. E.g. /dev/null i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-02-11 at 20:29:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mafd> E.g. /dev/null isn't needed by bind8 at all (also checked with
mafd> ktrace), not sure about bind9 though as it uses daemon(3) which
mafd> tries to open it.
On my 4.7-STABLE box, bind9 uses /de
hello, tim. the patch you sent me did fix the problem stated, but now I've
noticed some interesting characteristics of the files that are created by a
unix machine on a share mounted by mount_smbfs, which itself resides on a
windows 200 machine.
I haven't looked into the details, but I'm using kde
Hi,
Having recently cvsupped to the latest current I have been
experiencing complete system freezes - by that I mean the system
disappears, cannot be pinged, nothing can be done on the console
etc.
The are no error messages relatin to the crash in /var/log/messages
and no weird application activi
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 10:14:58AM +0800, leafy wrote:
> lcms post-build tests now finishes correctly with pentium4 optimizations.
> And I have world with the p4 optimization with no ill-effact so far.
No, it still fails.
This is on a new world built with CPUTYPE?=p4 and then:
'portupgrade -f lc
> I have been watching this list and I have not seen much talk about the
> stability of FreeBSD 5.0 (RELENG_5_0) or of its use as a server? I did see
> that some people have upgraded their 4.7 servers to 5.0. Can anybody relate
> their experience with the OS release? I am looking for cases in pa
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
>/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/geom/bde/g_bde.c: In function `g_bde_config':
>/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/geom/bde/g_bde.c:251: structure has no member named
>`slicesize'
>/local0/scratch/des/src/sys/geom/bde/g_bde.c:252: structure has no member named
>`sliceoffset'
My fault, already fixed.
--
Hi!
I've sent this post to comp.unix.bsd.freebsd, and I've been told that I
should report the problem to this list, so...
Original Message
Hi folks!
I was trying to modularize the sound in my 5.0R machine, which has two
sound cards:
$ dmesg | grep pcm.:
pcm0: port 0xb000-0xb
< said:
> Trying to use a compiler different from GCC I have found the folowing error
> "/usr/include/sys/syslimits.h", line 42: Error:
>[ISO 6.8]: Unknown preprocessing directive, '#warning'.
It should probably be a #error instead.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Hi,
lately, I end up in ddb when I connect my (unconnected) serial console
cable to another machine. It's not critical, since "c" will continue
fine, but it's annoying. Here's a trace:
db> trace
siointr1(c635a,0,c0361fb6,671,df101ce8) at siointr1+0x3c4
siointr(c635a000) at siointr+0x35
Xfas
* De: Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2003-02-11 ]
[ Subjecte: C conformance. ]
> < said:
>
> > Trying to use a compiler different from GCC I have found the folowing error
> > "/usr/include/sys/syslimits.h", line 42: Error:
> >[ISO 6.8]: Unknown preprocessing directive, '#w
At 7:01 PM -0500 2/11/03, Garrett Wollman wrote:
< said:
> Trying to use a compiler different from GCC I have found the
> folowing error:
> "/usr/include/sys/syslimits.h", line 42: Error:
> [ISO 6.8]: Unknown preprocessing directive, '#warning'.
It should probably be a #error instead.
Dear Hackers,
Does WITNESS keeps track of particular mutex instance or
just places where particular mutex type was acquired and
released? Is it even possible to keep track of individual
instance of the particular mutex type?
Here is my problem. In my code (Bluetooth sockets layers)
each socket/PC
There is a potential bug in src/lib/libc/net/nsdispatch.c
in the function
const ns_dbt * _nsdbtget(const char * name).
The static variable
static time_t confmod;
is not initialized to anything.
It may have some random value the first time this function is called and
if you look at the program
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:11:39PM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
> Testing curves join ...failed!
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/lcms/work/lcms-1.09/testbed.
> *** Error code 1
>
> So, the lcms port still fails with CPUTYPE=p4 and there seems to be other
> issues still with C
hi, there!
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 07:37:31PM -0600, David Leimbach wrote:
> There is a potential bug in src/lib/libc/net/nsdispatch.c
>
> in the function
> const ns_dbt * _nsdbtget(const char * name).
>
> The static variable
>
> static time_t confmod;
>
> is not initialized to anything.
>
>
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, leafy wrote:
> >
> > Anders
> Yes I noticed it this morning too.
> The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4
>opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted GCC, it borks. Looks like P4 opted
>GCC itself is bogus.
That's odd. Does
Bug?
no. static variables are initialized with all-zeroes.
Groovy...
/me goes to buy electronic ANSI C standard :P
Dave
/fjoe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote:
> > The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4
>opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted GCC, it borks. Looks like P4 opted
>GCC itself is bogus.
>
> That's odd. Does the FreeBSD build
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, leafy wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Anders
> > Yes I noticed it this morning too.
> > The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4
>opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted G
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:03:28PM -0500, Wesley Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, leafy wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Anders
> > Yes I noticed it this morning too.
> > The funny thing is that. If you use a non-P4 optmized GCC to compile lcms with P4
>opt, then it passes the test. But with a P4 opted G
I keep ketting errors when trying to make my root filesystem encrypted:
bash-2.05b# gbde init /dev/ad0s2a
gbde: /dev/ad0s2a: No such file or directory
bash-2.05b#
bash-2.05b# ls /dev/ad0*
/dev/ad0/dev/ad0s2 /dev/ad0s2b /dev/ad0s2d /dev/ad0s2f
/dev/ad0s1 /dev/ad0s2a
43 matches
Mail list logo
