Re: Minor oddity with sysinstall/disklabel on -current

In message , Garance A Drosihn writes: >So, I'm trying something on -current. > >I boot up, log into root. I have two hard disks on the system. All >of my mounted partitions are on ad0, except for one partition on ad2. >I 'umount' that partition. I run the

Re: ftpd mkdir problems

On 31-Jan-2003 David Rhodus wrote: | Using the default ftpd that comes with FreeBSD, in the mkdir command, | why doesn't it expand '~', the cd and rmdir commands seem to. Passing | over the code it just calls the c function with should expand it. No, the system calls don't expand a tilde. The e

Re: Panic#2 copying many files from UFS to UFS2 partition

At 7:50 PM -0500 1/29/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote: At 9:49 PM -0500 1/28/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote: Hmm, well, I finally got my first actual system panic which wasn't obviously caused by my own screwing around. On the console I have: free inode /usr/cvs/net/64 had 0 blocks panic: Negative

Re: What is the difference between p_ucred and td_ucred?

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > The strategy for selecting a credential to check against is generally to > use td_ucred, and to hold no locks. You'll see that suser() does this, > for example. Under some circumstances: specifically, credential updates, > you need to hold the process

Re: L440gx+ serial BIOS needs text mode

Hello, > The sense of the -P option was changed, and it makes it so you have to > do extra work to get the console driver to do the right thing from > inside FreeBSD proper, on a machine that could have its keyboard removed > (or not). It's because the -h is implied, and it's a toggle. Oh, I see

Re: rand() is broken

On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 21:40:20 -0800, David Schultz wrote: > followed by a 5 or 6. There is a similar pattern for 'e a 7'. I > think this pretty much demonstrates that the algorithm isn't good > enough to generate high-quality randomness with respect to > different seed values. I'm not sugges

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:46:59 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > Returning to current algorithm, I am interested in good NSHUFF value in > the range 100-2000. Do you have any findings there? Apparently 100 is not enough too, I see repeated pattern in your program. I'll try other values...

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:46:59 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > So, if you define USE_WEAK_SEEDING and re-compile rand.c, you'll get even > worse results from your test. It means current variant is better then > previous. If you know even better algorithm wich pass restrictions above, > just

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:58:40 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:46:59 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > > Returning to current algorithm, I am interested in good NSHUFF value in > > the range 100-2000. Do you have any findings there? > > Apparently 100 is not en

Re: rand() is broken

Thus spake Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 21:40:20 -0800, David Schultz wrote: > I don't try to make rand() good for high-quality pseudo-randomness, > because it can be done by price of speed and, more important, big state > size. Due to rand_r() restriction state

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 03:52:37 -0800, David Schultz wrote: > > You can do better than the present generator with 32 bits of state. > See the following page by Neal Wagner (not to be confused with David Wagner): > http://www.cs.utsa.edu/~wagner/laws/rng.html > The section on LCGs suggests t

alpha tinderbox failure

-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Missing semicolon in generated insn-recog.c file.

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 18:59:46 +0100 Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried a buildworld yesterday and today, and I got: > ---snip--- > gcc -I/big/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../../../../contrib/gcc/config -DHAVE_C > ONFIG_H -DTARGET_NAME=\"i386-undermydesk-freebsd\" -DIN_GCC -c

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 15:07:30 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 03:52:37 -0800, David Schultz wrote: > > > > You can do better than the present generator with 32 bits of state. > > See the following page by Neal Wagner (not to be confused with David Wagner): > > http

Re: What is the difference between p_ucred and td_ucred?

On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Ilmar S. Habibulin wrote: > On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > > > The strategy for selecting a credential to check against is generally to > > use td_ucred, and to hold no locks. You'll see that suser() does this, > > for example. Under some circumstances: specific

Re: rand() is broken

David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You can do better than the present generator with 32 bits of state. > See the following page by Neal Wagner (not to be confused with David Wagner): > http://www.cs.utsa.edu/~wagner/laws/rng.html The attached patch, based on one of the m/k pairs sug

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 14:00:27 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > You can do better than the present generator with 32 bits of state. > > See the following page by Neal Wagner (not to be confused with David Wagner): > > http://www.cs.utsa.edu/~wa

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 16:10:06 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 14:00:27 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > You can do better than the present generator with 32 bits of state. > > > See the following page by Neal Wagner (

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 16:17:48 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 16:10:06 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 14:00:27 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > You can do better than the present gener

Re: rand() is broken

"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is one bug in your patch: 0 is still illegal, so my fix required. I believe that's a feature. All linear congruence generator have a fixed point. 0 is a far better fixed point than any other because it is more "obviously unsuited" (for some

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 16:28:45 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > I'll produce working variant based on your patch... > When all done correctly, there is repeated pattern still, so some NSHUFF drop required too: 1 7 e 4 a 0 7 d 3 a 0 6 See attached patch based on -current sources. -- Andr

Re: rand() is broken

"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And the next bug is 32bit overflow there: > > tmp = *ctx * 62089911; Ack, I thought the type promotion was automatic. Updated patch is attached. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: lib/libc/stdlib/rand.c =

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 14:43:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > I believe that's a feature. All linear congruence generator have a > fixed point. 0 is a far better fixed point than any other because it > is more "obviously unsuited" (for some values of "obviously") as a > seed value. (but

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 16:47:14 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 16:28:45 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > > I'll produce working variant based on your patch... > > > > When all done correctly, there is repeated pattern still, so some NSHUFF > drop required too: >

Re: rand() is broken

"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > With NSHUFF 100 situation not changed much, so I beleive that stated > problem is common for this type PRNGs, so we gains nothing changing > formulae to Knuth-recommended values. Yes we do. We get a better sequence for any given seed, i.e. we ge

Re: rand() is broken

"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 14:43:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > All that being said, adding 1 to *ctx before returning it (see patch) > > adresses both of your objections: a seed of 0 will not cause the LCG > > to get stuck, and the result of

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 15:23:28 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 14:43:57 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > All that being said, adding 1 to *ctx before returning it (see patch) > > > adresses both of your objecti

Interested in helping the C99 integration project

Hi, I am a software developer who has benefitted greatly from using FreeBSD the past few years as well as other software like KDE. I have been doing what I can here and there to make sure big projects like KDE will build and run on FreeBSD as well as other operating systems. I came to the rea

Re: Interested in helping the C99 integration project

[Please wrap lines at 72 characters or less.] David Leimbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I am a software developer who has benefitted greatly from using FreeBSD the past few >years as well as other software like KDE. I have been doing what I can here and >there to make sure big proje

Re: Interested in helping the C99 integration project

>See http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/ > >Wes Peters has been assigned this task for a while. Perhaps you could >co-ordinate with him. Yes and no offense to him... I am sure he is busy. Its not done yet :) I will contact him and see if I can lend a hand in any way. Thanks for the informat

Re: Boot failure with latest -CURRENT

On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Pascal Giannakakis wrote: > today i updated sources with CVS, compiled world and kernel, then > rebooted. During boot it hangs at the boot message (the place where in > FreeBSD 4.7 a lot of boot info would appear, like ata, cpu, usb0 blah blah). > > - The keyboard num-lock do

Status of cross-releases

The first (confirmed to work) cross-release! Finally, I've been able to build an i386 snapshot on Alpha, and make sure it works! This is the "uname -a" output from the Alpha box which was used to build the snapshot, root access kindly provided by Wilko Bulte: : FreeBSD ds10.wbnet 5.0-CURRENT Fre

Re: Status of cross-releases

> There's still one issue to be resolved for "i386 on alpha" > cross-releases: btxld(8) produces a binary image different > from when it's run natively This might be related to the failure I've seen trying to cross-compile i386 world on sparc64. btxldr dies with 'short read' error there. > Alexan

Re: Status of cross-releases

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 11:46:06AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > There's still one issue to be resolved for "i386 on alpha" > > cross-releases: btxld(8) produces a binary image different > > from when it's run natively > > This might be related to the failure I've seen trying to cross-compile

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 15:22:03 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Yes we do. We get a better sequence for any given seed, i.e. we get > less correlation between n and x(n) for any given x(0). I don't think > it changes much for long sequences, but we get a better distribution > for short se

Re: rand() is broken

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 17:36:04 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > with a != 0 values are monotonically increased, I try with > a == 123459876 With your a == 62089911 (i.e. +1) the same: 0: 62089911 1: 124179822 2: 186269733 3: 248359644 4: 310449555 5: 372539466 6: 434629377 7: 496719288 8: 55

Re: ftpd mkdir problems

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 03:05:31AM -0500, Mike Heffner wrote: > > On 31-Jan-2003 David Rhodus wrote: > | Using the default ftpd that comes with FreeBSD, in the mkdir command, > | why doesn't it expand '~', the cd and rmdir commands seem to. Passing > | over the code it just calls the c function

Re: ftpd mkdir problems

On 04-Feb-2003 Yar Tikhiy wrote: | On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 03:05:31AM -0500, Mike Heffner wrote: |> |> On 31-Jan-2003 David Rhodus wrote: |> | Using the default ftpd that comes with FreeBSD, in the mkdir command, |> | why doesn't it expand '~', the cd and rmdir commands seem to. Passing |> | over

raidframe issues

I'm trying to create a raid set but after hitting the end of initializing a raid5 stripe the following is displayed on the console: raid0: node (Rod) returned fail, rolling backward raid0: IO Error. Marking /dev/da2s1e as failed. raid0: node (Rod) returned fail, rolling backward raid0: IO Error

5.0 on IBM T30: X11 failure

I have just scratch installed 5.0 from CD. (By scratch install I mean I told it to delete and recreate all partitions except /users, so none of my old OS configurations should have been preseved.) When I installed 5.0 X11 worked. After turning off ACPI the built-in trackpoint mouse started worki

Re: Status of cross-releases

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 06:35:40PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > The first (confirmed to work) cross-release! > > Finally, I've been able to build an i386 snapshot on Alpha, > and make sure it works! > [...] > There's still one issue to be resolved for "i386 on alpha" > cross-releases: btxld(8)

Re: Boot failure with latest -CURRENT

Andre Guibert de Bruet schrieb: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Pascal Giannakakis wrote: today i updated sources with CVS, compiled world and kernel, then rebooted. During boot it hangs at the boot message (the place where in FreeBSD 4.7 a lot of boot info would appear, like ata, cpu, usb0 blah blah). -

Re: 5.0 on IBM T30: X11 failure

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:58:04AM -0800, Lee Damon wrote: > (II) ATI: Candidate "Device" section "Card0". > (--) Chipset ATI Radeon Mobility LW (AGP) found There are known problems with the ATI Radeon Mobility driver. I had to compile X11 from the cvs repository at www.xfree86.org to get my lab

APM and ACPI fail on Toshiba Satellite

I've stumbled across a Satellite 1605CDS that I'm trying to beat into shape. ACPI fails as follows: acpi0: on motherboard ACPI-0483: *** Error: GPE0 block (GPE 0 to 15) overlaps the GPE1 block (GPE 0 to 15) acpi0: could not enable ACPI: AE_BAD_VALUE device_probe_and_attach: acpi0 attach ret

Re: 5.0 on IBM T30: X11 failure

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 11:38:09AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:58:04AM -0800, Lee Damon wrote: > > (II) ATI: Candidate "Device" section "Card0". > > (--) Chipset ATI Radeon Mobility LW (AGP) found > > There are known problems with the ATI Radeon Mobility > driver. I ha

Re: 5.0 on IBM T30: X11 failure

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:40:09PM +0100, Flag_reda wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 11:38:09AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:58:04AM -0800, Lee Damon wrote: > > > (II) ATI: Candidate "Device" section "Card0". > > > (--) Chipset ATI Radeon Mobility LW (AGP) found > > >

Re: 5.0 on IBM T30: X11 failure

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:40:09PM +0100, Flag_reda wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 11:38:09AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:58:04AM -0800, Lee Damon wrote: > > > (II) ATI: Candidate "Device" section "Card0". > > > (--) Chipset ATI Radeon Mobility LW (AGP) found > > >

Preview: GEOMs statistics code.

I have created a patch which contains a preview of the statistics code I intend to add to GEOM, and would invite people to play with it and give me some feedback: http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/geom_iostat.patch Here is a small shell-script to watch the output with: http://phk.free

Re: 5.0 on IBM T30: X11 failure

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:41:46AM +0300, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > > Tell more about your Radeon, because I use -CURRENT with APM > (not ACPI <- it crash my note at boottime), > ATI Radeon LY Mobility 6 (AGP), XFree86-4.2.1 (from ports) > without of any problems. it's not the radeon, it's the ag

Re: APM and ACPI fail on Toshiba Satellite

"Cliff L. Biffle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I sort of expected ACPI to fail after watching everyone else, but the killer > here is that APM doesn't seem to work either once ACPI is disabled. Its > error messages are less interesting. When compiled into the kernel, there > are no error mess

maildrop/tmpfile breakage on 5.0-RELEASE (?)

I noticed a growing queue of undelivered messages today and after some digging I found out that maildrop, which I use as a local delivery agent for sendmail in order to deliver to Maildirs, would fail on some messages bigger than its message-buffer with "Unable to create temporary file.". I tra

Re: maildrop/tmpfile breakage on 5.0-RELEASE (?)

On Tuesday 04 February 2003 23:34, David Wolfskill wrote: > I haven't seen that particular issue, but there was a time in -CURRENT > when my "make -j8 buildworld" runs were failing: I was using an md > device for /tmp, and it was running out of inodes. I had not thought of that, but /tmp is just

Re: Minor oddity with sysinstall/disklabel on -current

At 9:04 AM +0100 2/4/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Garance A Drosihn writes: > I drop out of sysinstall, do some things with that partition, and then decide to redo the above sequence. Everything has been working fine, but I'm just testing some things and I end up in a position where it's qui

Re: Preview: GEOMs statistics code.

At 10:44 PM +0100 2003/02/04, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In difference from the devstat framework which measures how big a percentage of the time a drive has one or more outstanding requests, I think that measuring the responstime is a much more useful metric. (comments, input, references welco

Re: Preview: GEOMs statistics code.

At 4:58 PM -0600 2003/02/04, Dan Nelson wrote: I pressume we also want to collect number of bytes transferred, and I will add that in the next iteration. Definitely. What I'd like is enough statistics to be able to duplicate Solaris' iostat -x output: You know, that is *precisely* what

Re: Preview: GEOMs statistics code.

In message , Brad Knowles writes: >At 10:44 PM +0100 2003/02/04, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In difference from the devstat framework which measures how big a >> percentage of the time a drive has one or more outstanding requests, >> I think that measurin

alpha tinderbox failure

-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: Preview: GEOMs statistics code.

At 1:07 AM +0100 2003/02/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't have a queue-depth as such, but I have number of transactions in transit. Will a snapshot of that at the time of the read do what you want ? I am too sleepy to know if that will allow you to calculate the average number of outsta

Re: Preview: GEOMs statistics code.

In the last episode (Feb 04), Poul-Henning Kamp said: > Collecting number of operations and number of errors is a nobrainer. > > The timestamps cost something to make, and my plan was to only > collect them while a monitoring program is running. (Is this a good > idea ?) > > In difference from t

Re: Preview: GEOMs statistics code.

On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > Now, discussion time: > > The timestamps cost something to make, and my plan was to only collect > them while a monitoring program is running. (Is this a good idea ?) > probably it is a good idea though it does lead to the possibility of

Re: Preview: GEOMs statistics code.

On Wednesday, 5 February 2003 at 1:07:47 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , Brad Knowles writes: >> At 10:44 PM +0100 2003/02/04, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >>> In difference from the devstat framework which measures how big a >>> percentage o

Re: kernel message -- a prank?

[redirected to -current] On Tuesday, 4 February 2003 at 17:55:42 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > with last hour, cvsup current, rebuild everything,... immediately > after kernel mount msg for / > kernel cranks out msg > Be nice to each other, mmmkay? > system otherwise fine. Is this a kno

Re: kernel message -- a prank?

On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 09:01 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: with last hour, cvsup current, rebuild everything,... immediately after kernel mount msg for / kernel cranks out msg Be nice to each other, mmmkay? system otherwise fine. Is this a known prank? It is now. It's in /sys/ker

Re: -current, IBM A30p & 2 external FW-disks

I have improved recovery code after timeout in -current. Could you try that? /\ Hidetoshi Shimokawa \/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP public key: http://www.sat.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~simokawa/pgp.html At Sun, 2 Feb 2003 13:28:33 +0200, mike wrote: > > [1 ] > On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:41:59 +0900, Hidetoshi Shi

Re: Server locking hard -- A LOT!!!

On 4 Feb, Muhannad Asfour wrote: > Hello. I've recently faced a rather odd issue that I've never seen > before. I bought a new server (specs below), and I loaded it up with > FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE (I know, I know, not for a production environment, > but this is a personal server). Now, whenever I

Server locking hard -- A LOT!!!

Hello. I've recently faced a rather odd issue that I've never seen before. I bought a new server (specs below), and I loaded it up with FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE (I know, I know, not for a production environment, but this is a personal server). Now, whenever I get about 30 simultaneous connections, th

Re: Server locking hard -- A LOT!!!

On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 22:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 4 Feb, Muhannad Asfour wrote: > > Hello. I've recently faced a rather odd issue that I've never seen > > before. I bought a new server (specs below), and I loaded it up with > > FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE (I know, I know, not for a production e

Re: Server locking hard -- A LOT!!!

On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 22:49, Laszlo Vagner wrote: > Muhannad Asfour wrote: > > >Hello. I've recently faced a rather odd issue that I've never seen > >before. I bought a new server (specs below), and I loaded it up with > >FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE (I know, I know, not for a production environment, > >

5.0-R freezing on kernel probe with Toshiba laptop?

I have a Toshiba Satellite 1805-S207 laptop. When I boot the generic 5.0-R kernel from a fresh install (fresh as in initial reboot), it will show the device lines for agp0 then hang indefinitely, requiring that I turn off the machine via the power button. This is a repeating event, and occurs

SCHED_ULE and priorities

I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty serious bug: PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND 573 dnetc139 20 1000K 804K RUN 1:29 85.94% 85.94% dnetc 661 kris 960 2252K 1496K RUN 0:00 6.25% 6.25% to

Re: SCHED_ULE and priorities

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:38:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty > serious bug: > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > 573 dnetc139 20 1000K 804K RUN 1:29 85.94% 85.94% d

Re: SCHED_ULE and priorities

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:38:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty > serious bug: > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > 573 dnetc139 20 1000K 804K RUN 1:29 85.94% 85.94% d

Re: SCHED_ULE and priorities

On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:54:23PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:38:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty > > serious bug: > > > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAN

Re: SCHED_ULE and priorities

On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:54:23PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 09:38:18PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > I just booted a kernel with SCHED_ULE. It looks like there's a pretty > > > serious bug: > > > > > > PID USERNAME PRI

Re: Preview: GEOMs statistics code.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" writes: >2. %busy. I personally think this is the most important one, but as >you say, there's no reason not to do the others as well. The problem with this one is that we can't measure it in a way which tells us the truth, and we may n

Re: Server locking hard -- A LOT!!!

On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 00:39, Matt Rudderham wrote: > Hi, > You're DMESG is only showing those disks as running at UDMA33, Verify > your cabling and go for some high quality 80Pin cables, this should make > a big difference, I find FreeBSD sometimes has a few quirks in this > area, but nothing conc