On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:35:01PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Sean Kelly wrote:
> > On my 5.0-CURRENT kernel built 45 minutes ago, I can bring my system to its
> > knees by doing
> >
> > # cat /dev/io
> >
> > While I understand that this isn't exactly something one would nor
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Sean Kelly wrote:
> On my 5.0-CURRENT kernel built 45 minutes ago, I can bring my system to its
> knees by doing
>
> # cat /dev/io
>
> While I understand that this isn't exactly something one would normally be
> doing, is it really something that should bring the system down?
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
> I got this tonight on my ultra. I thought it was sparc64 specific, glad
> I saw your post. I cvsup'd 2 days ago.
>
> Im going to build OpenSSH from ports and see if it has the same error.
I posted here about three or four days ago, saying that using the
ports' version is a workaround to t
Sean Kelly wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:35:01PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Sean Kelly wrote:
>
>>On my 5.0-CURRENT kernel built 45 minutes ago, I can bring my system
to its
>>knees by doing
>>
>># cat /dev/io
>>
>>While I understand that this isn't exactly something o
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:46:44PM -0800, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > #ifndef PFIL_HOOKS
> > #error "You must specify PFIL_HOOKS when using ipfilter"
> > #endif
> >
> > Unfortunately there's no way that I know to express this if ipfilter is
> > loaded as a module.
>
> Duh, there'll
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:27:53AM +0100, Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since yesterday I cannot login to my CURRENT machine anymore
> after a world and reboot ...
>
> I really hope this doesn't got MFC'd to RELENG_5_0 ...
> debug1: Calling cleanup 0x8061180(0x0)
> debug1: PAM: cl
Hi,
> Disable ChallengeResponseAuthentication, set it to "no" and you'll
> have ssh again.
> --
Thanks, I'll try it at home this evening ...
Shouldn't we fix this the default config ?
Martin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 12:09:39PM +0100, Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Disable ChallengeResponseAuthentication, set it to "no" and you'll
> > have ssh again.
> > --
>
> Thanks, I'll try it at home this evening ...
>
> Shouldn't we fix this the default config ?
I think it will dis
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 05:11:32PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I found another couple of bugs, this time in OHCI's DMA
> buffer chaining code.
Great.
> A patch for this with additional debugging code is
> included below (for current). There are two bugs.
> I do not know i
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Taavi Talvik wrote:
After testing, it turns out, that 'hang on reboot' problem maybe related
to mainboard (Gigabyte GA-8PE667 Ultra) and/or USB driver for Intel 82801DB.
After turning off onboard USB rebooting works even if ACPI is enabled.
It was necessary to disable only In
On 2002-12-20 08:27:53 (+0100), Martin Blapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since yesterday I cannot login to my CURRENT machine anymore
> after a world and reboot ...
Same problem here (on Alpha and on i386, if it matters). Logging in with a
public key works, without doesn't.
> Then the connectio
Can someone figure out why this port has recent become broken on i386
and alpha?
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-5-latest/xcpustate-2.5.log
Kris
msg49119/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello.
Initiated mutex for prison isn't destroyed on error.
Kernel will on every error.
Here You got patch for this:
--- kern_jail.c.origFri Dec 20 15:11:10 2002
+++ kern_jail.c Fri Dec 20 15:14:03 2002
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@
PROC_UNLOCK(p);
crfree(newcred);
bail:
+ mtx_d
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Initiated mutex for prison isn't destroyed on error.
> Kernel will on every error.
I just committed your patch, thanks!
Cheers,
Maxime
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
hi, guys.
Does anyone have VMware2 port running successfully on -current ?
my VMware2 port's startup script says
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/vmware.sh: cannot create /compat/linux/dev/vmnet1: Device not
configured
I digged into this a little and found that this message is from the line
echo -n
Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:46:44PM -0800, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > #ifndef PFIL_HOOKS
> > > #error "You must specify PFIL_HOOKS when using ipfilter"
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > Unfortunately there's no way that I know to express this if ipfilter is
> > > loa
Hello,
Yoshinori KASAZAKI wrote:
hi, guys.
Does anyone have VMware2 port running successfully on -current ?
i'm :)
my VMware2 port's startup script says
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/vmware.sh: cannot create /compat/linux/dev/vmnet1: Device not configured
I digged into this a little and found th
:The NetBSD code is already different:
:1.48 (augustss 15-Sep-99): /* The OHCI hardware can handle at
:most one page crossing. */
:1.48 (augustss 15-Sep-99): if (OHCI_PAGE(dataphys) ==
:dataphysend ||
:1.48 (augustss 15-Sep-99):
The rshd started to crash on my system after the recent -current
upgrade. It does not dump core (why?), but with a lot of syslog() I
narrowed the trouble spot down to the pam_setenv() calls -- the very
first one of them, in rshd.c never returned... The libpam is:
/usr/lib/libpam.so.2:
$FreeBS
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Scott Long wrote:
> Many peripheral hardware device do not like having their registers
> blindly read (it's quite common for a read operation on a register to
> signal an ASIC that it's ok to do a certain action) and will respond
> with nasty things like interrupt storms, endl
hi.
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:42:46 -0800
Maksim Yevmenkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yoshinori KASAZAKI wrote:
>
> >hi, guys.
> >
> >Does anyone have VMware2 port running successfully on -current ?
> >
> i'm :)
that's great :)
> >my VMware2 port's startup script says
> >
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:30:42AM -0800, Terry Lambert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:46:44PM -0800, Sam Leffler
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > #ifndef PFIL_HOOKS #error "You must specify PFIL_HOOKS when
> > > > using ipfilter" #endif
> >
If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with
vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached).
It's apply to both current and stable.
Dan
--
Dan Lukes tel: +420 2 21914205, fax: +420 2 21914206
root of FIONet, KolejNET, webmaster of www.freebsd.cz
AKA: [EM
Hi,
Does this bug show up in the trunk ports statistics as runt packets ?
---Mike
At 10:22 PM 20/12/2002 +0100, Dan Lukes wrote:
If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with
vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached).
It's apply to
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:30:42AM -0800, Terry Lambert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:46:44PM -0800, Sam Leffler
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > #ifndef PFIL_HOOKS #error "You must s
This is coincidence, I was bored by this also today for making the symlink
for the Nth time.
Your patch however should be applied only on -CURRENT and not on -STABLE.
(Also a 'ln -sf' would make the line above it unnecessary)
If you could pursue this to a commit I and others would be very gratefu
Hi,
when trying to install adasockets I got the following error message:
/usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:44: syntax error before "tcp_seq"
/usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:44: warning: data definition has no type or
storage
class
/usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:45: syntax error before "tcp_cc"
/usr/include/
Sergey Mokryshev wrote:
> Unfortunately nobody cares to look into PR database (conf/44576)
>
> In case PFIL_HOOKS really slows IP processing I don't mind keeping this
> out of GENERIC, however it should be noted in UPDATING and release notes.
>
> I did not do any time consuming searches the first
On Fri, 20 Dec 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Sergey Mokryshev wrote:
> > Unfortunately nobody cares to look into PR database (conf/44576)
> >
> > In case PFIL_HOOKS really slows IP processing I don't mind keeping this
> > out of GENERIC, however it should be noted in UPDATING and release notes.
> >
Dan Lukes wrote:
>
> If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with
> vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached).
>
> It's apply to both current and stable.
Does fxp have hardware support for vlans? I use vlans extensively and
never noticed a problem.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 12:47:22AM +0100, David Holm wrote:
> Hi,
> when trying to install adasockets I got the following error message:
>
> /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:44: syntax error before "tcp_seq"
> /usr/include/netinet/tcp.h:44: warning: data definition has no type or
> storage
> class
>
Muhannad Asfour wrote:
Hi, I was searching on groups.google.com recently to try to find out how
to get mod_php4 compiled under 5.0-CURRENT, and I found your message and
thought you might be of some assistance. I recently built a new server
and wanted to run 5.0-CURRENT on it. I installed 5.0,
Okay, I must be losing my mind. Does anyone know why the following
program compiled with stock gcc-3.2.1, stock CFLAGS, and no CPUTYPE
produces:
ddy.quot = 1
ddy.rem = -1077937744
on -CURRENT, and:
ddy.quot = 8
ddy.rem = 0
On -stable?
#include
#include
main(void) {
div_t ddy;
int d
Hi :)))
I am trying to give boot with the cd of the FreeBSD 5.0-rc1 alone that not
of the o boot, gives acknowledgment of that kernel did not obtain to place
memory enough to give boot.
The machine is a AMD Ahtlon 900MHz with 256MB Ram.
With the cd of the 4.4-release and the 4.6-release of the o
Muhannad Asfour wrote:
Here's the dmesg output:
Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of tie University of California. All rights
reserved.
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Dec 20 00:32:59 EST 2002\M^J
[EMAIL
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:24:39PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> Okay, I must be losing my mind. Does anyone know why the following
> program compiled with stock gcc-3.2.1, stock CFLAGS, and no CPUTYPE
> produces:
>
> ddy.quot = 1
> ddy.rem = -1077937744
>
> on -CURRENT, and:
>
> ddy.quot
lock order reversal
1st 0xc35f0648 vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @
/usr/src/sys/nfsclient/nfs_vnops.c:2629
2nd 0xc043d678 vm page queue mutex (vm page queue mutex) @
/usr/src/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:424
I got this just now while copying a large file (155187200 bytes) to a
nfs volume (sparc client
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:09:54PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> lock order reversal
> 1st 0xc35f0648 vnode interlock (vnode interlock) @
>/usr/src/sys/nfsclient/nfs_vnops.c:2629
> 2nd 0xc043d678 vm page queue mutex (vm page queue mutex) @
>/usr/src/sys/vm/vm_kern.c:424
>
> I got this just now
* De: Tim Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-12-20 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: WEIRD! div() broken on -CURRENT? ]
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:24:39PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > I'm doing something wrong, right? I mean, this can't be right. I've
> > verified this now on a P4 running:
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
In some email I received from Terry Lambert, sie wrote:
> Sergey Mokryshev wrote:
> > Unfortunately nobody cares to look into PR database (conf/44576)
> >
> > In case PFIL_HOOKS really slows IP processing I don't mind keeping this
> > out of GENERIC, however it should be noted in UPDATING and rele
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 08:43:25PM -0800, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Tim Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-12-20 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: WEIRD! div() broken on -CURRENT? ]
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:24:39PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > I'm doing something wrong, right? I me
Daniel C. Sobral wrote, On 12/21/02 00:31:
Dan Lukes wrote:
>
> If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with
> vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached).
>
> It's apply to both current and stable.
Does fxp have hardware support for vlans? I use vlan
> At 10:22 PM 20/12/2002 +0100, Dan Lukes wrote:
> If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with
> vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached).
> Mike Tancsa wrote, On 12/20/02 22:46:
> Does this bug show up in the trunk ports statistics as runt
> pack
At 02:45 AM 12/21/2002 +0100, Dan Lukes wrote:
> At 10:22 PM 20/12/2002 +0100, Dan Lukes wrote:
> If there somebody failing to configure vlans on a nic with
> vlan-hardware support - read the PR 46405 (patch attached).
> Mike Tancsa wrote, On 12/20/02 22:46:
> Does this bug show
My SMP Athlon box paniced again tonight, and this time my serial
console caught it in the act.
I have no idea what has caused this, and have no idea if it has any
significance for 5.0-R or not. I wonder if we have a memory leak ?
Poul-Henning
login: panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small
47 matches
Mail list logo
