Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After watching some MPGs with the Linux binary-only mtvp (graphics/mtv
> port) I noticed 40 zomby processes:
Sorry, this is not really an answer to your question, but
for playing MPEG files, I've found vlc and mplayer very
useful, and in general bett
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 02:23:35PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Oct 2001 02:53:21 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 02:25:37AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know *you* have full-time IP connectivity to the internet and the
Okay, I hope putting my $.02 in here does not get me into this war. I just
have a comment/concern.
Taking uucp out of the system will leave a security hole around will it not?.
Actually I think this will make it worse. Now the users (unless they install
a fresh system) are left with the uucp b
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> I agree with Kris. These days it is not a big problem, especially for
> an opensource project, such as UUCP. Most obvious possibility is a
> Sourceforge - it provides all what is necessary (i.e. cvs repo, bug
> tracking database, mailing lists, www space, ftp space etc) at z
I'm interested in the UUCP code only in so far as it is an
unnecessary -- and so far, undefended by you -- change to
code that's working fine for other people.
My interest in a hosting site would be first for a startup,
and second, to host a competitor to the FreeBSD development,
most likely base
Here is a patch for adding a stub write function to libstand,
so that you could, for example, reimplement in FORTH the
nextboot utility, which was murdered when the new boot loader
was added.
This only implements a stub function, but it has comments
that indicate the needed semantics in the prese
Here is a patch to add the verbs "fwrite" and "flseek" to the
FORTH interpreter.
This is a necessary part of reimplementing the "nextboot" code,
which was murdered when the new boot loader came in.
Commit, K PLZ THX.
-- Terry
Index: boot/ficl/words.c
===
Terry Lambert wrote:
> After that, you can commit the patches to /sys/conf/param.c to
> make maxfiles and maxfilesperproc tunable at boot time, and the
> patches to login.c to make it possible to rebadge the "login:"
> and "password:" prompts, and the patches to /sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c
> to mak
Here are patches to three of the Gigabit ethernet drivers to
implement soft interrupt coelescing. I have included patches
for the dc, ti, and vr drivers... the ti driver is by far the
cleanest.
I don't use Bill Paul's Tigon III driver, so I haven't
included patche for it (the patches should be o
Peter Wemm wrote:
> param.c was moved to kern/subr_param.c and is fully dynamic, and already
> has these changes.
Nice to know that my changes previously posted to -current in
the 4.3 timeframe have been incorporated during the rewrite.
Thanks!
> If you're going to submit stuff, please at least
In regards to UUCP as a port, I think it's a good idea. There is
nothing preventing us from including the dist files in the CD
distribution so network connectivity is not needed for someone to
install it.
If someone else puts together the port I would be happy to provide
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Peter Wemm wrote:
> > param.c was moved to kern/subr_param.c and is fully dynamic, and already
> > has these changes.
>
> Nice to know that my changes previously posted to -current in
> the 4.3 timeframe have been incorporated during the rewrite.
BULLSHIT! They came from
Matt Dillon wrote:
> In regards to UUCP as a port, I think it's a good idea. There is
> nothing preventing us from including the dist files in the CD
> distribution so network connectivity is not needed for someone to
> install it.
>
> If someone else puts together the port I
I use NFS pretty heavily betwen machines on my home network. My little
file server box is currently having "issues," so it crashes sometimes.
Before the NFS mega commit recently when the file server went down for
whatever reason my -current workstation would just sit patiently waiting
for
Peter Wemm wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > If you're going to submit stuff, please at least do us the courtesy to ma
ke
> > > sure it is relative to recent source trees. This change was made quite s
om
> e
> > > time ago on both -current and RELENG_4.
> >
> > Yeah; I made it las
Terry Lambert wrote:
> This is based on ideas in the Jeff Mogul (DEC Western Research
> Labs) paper from 1995:
These look like a subset of what Garrett was working on in 1996:
(sys/i386/isa/if_ed.c)
revision 1.95.2.1
date: 1996/04/01 18:59:25; author: wollman; state: Exp; lines: +378 -22
Th
Apologies to everyone who will get this e-mail twice. My previuos
attempt usig different email account has been bounced back by
hub.freebsd.org.
I reported this bug to Julian and he promised to fix it soon. Unfortunately,
that didn't happen yet. In a meantime, I am using
the patch attached.
Of
My previos mail
a) is missing a Subject
b) contains typo in the patch,
(td ? td->td_proc : NULLi)^ Unwanted 'i' is here
:(
Apologies to everyone again. I was in a bit of a hurry
when sending previos messages.
___
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 12:40:57 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Here are patches to three of the Gigabit ethernet drivers to
> implement soft interrupt coelescing. I have included patches
> for the dc, ti, and vr drivers... the ti driver is by far the
> cleanest.
>
> I don't use Bill Paul's Tigon
Peter Wemm wrote:
> > http://www.research.digital.com/wrl/techreports/abstracts/95.8.html
> > http://ftp.digital.com/%7emogul/usenix96.ps
> >
> > Kris: Commit this... K PLZ THX.
>
> Certainly not with this lousy patch with no context!
To be clear: I was complaining about the non-context di
Hi,
today I started experiencing some very weird failures on my laptop (Thinkpad
570E). I got:
[...]
Using $PIR table, 10 entries at 0xc00fdef0
ACPI-0446: *** Warning: Invalid checksum (4c) in table FACP
ACPI-0305: *** Warning: Invalid table signature ^BOOT found
ACPI-0191: *** Error: AcpiLoadTa
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 12:15:23PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > You may recall that this isn't the first time I've tried to offer my
> > help in developing and committing your changes to an area of FreeBSD
> > which you've complained about -- although at least this time you
> > didn't just ign
Riccardo Torrini wrote:
> Have you a suggestion of a date of a _not_too_much_ dangerous
> -current to cvs? I really want to build world again, so I can
> avoid this really stupid questions... 0:-)
It's really up to you to follow -current and cvs-all and make that
determination for your
On Sat, 06 Oct 2001 12:15:23 MST, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I'm interested in the UUCP code only in so far as it is an
> unnecessary -- and so far, undefended by you -- change to
> code that's working fine for other people.
The change is not undefended. It's been made very clear from the
beginni
Doug Barton wrote:
>
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > If this Yahoo! Messenger is the 4.x application, make sure to add
> > COMPAT4X=TRUE to /etc/make.conf. This will remove old libc.so.4
> > from /usr/lib and install proper one into /usr/lib/compat.
>
> While this does install the approp
Well, seems to be my week for finding bugs. With -current sources that are
up to date as of now, the kernel panics when it tries to probe my CD
writer. I have scsi hard drives, an atapi CD-ROM as master on ata0, and a
CD-RW as master on ata1. Normally they probe like this:
acd0: DVD-ROM at ata0-
Thank you for your comments.
The User Config menu is completely disabled and isn't available
in -CURRENT now.
I strongly doubt it will ever come back. You see, we can now
set/unset/edit device resource "hints" from the loader(8) prompt,
thus, there is little need to have the old User Config menu
Peter Wemm wrote:
>
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Peter Wemm wrote:
> > > param.c was moved to kern/subr_param.c and is fully dynamic, and already
> > > has these changes.
> >
> > Nice to know that my changes previously posted to -current in
> > the 4.3 timeframe have been incorporated during the re
Peter Wemm wrote:
> Incidently, *knowingly* posting patches that are a year out of date do not
> look good for anybody. :-(
24 Apr 2001 was not a year ago.
I won't get into the "we don't use -current" argument again;
if you want the patches, take them. The diffs will apply
cleanly for the most
29 matches
Mail list logo
