On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:51:32AM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> > "Ruslan" == Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ruslan> It doesn't really matter what the home directory is set to
> Ruslan> (IIRC), but the shell must be uucico(8).
>
> No, this is wrong on both counts.
>
> Hi, I've just made a workaround for this. Intel folks, could you review
> it as always?
>
> > The problem is here, right?
> > > can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.PCI0.ISA_.FDC0 - AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT
> >
> > I'm sure _SB_.PCI0.ISA_.FDC0._CRS (Current Resource Settings) have some
> > problems
Hi,
I have applied the KSE patches to vmware2 that were posted on
http://www.ripe.net/home/mark/files/vmware2_kse.patch.tgz. I can now
build vmware2, but run into a number of permission problems running
it:
1. Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
Xlib: Client is not authorized to c
What's the reason why KI_NGROUPS should be different from NGROUPS_MAX?
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Note this will break binary compatibility for xucred. Note also that this
> may have fascinating effects in NFS environments. Note also that you'll
> probab
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 07:12:37PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> NO,
>
> POP and IMAP (I think) will lose all the envelope information,
There are ugly methods of puting these into extended header.
I don't like it.
> UUCP keeps that..
>
> SMTP is a PUSH operation..
Not neccesarily - there a
On 02-Oct-2001 Bernd Walter wrote:
> But UUCP is also independend from an IP connection and can run on
> nearly every bidirectional communication channel - even loosy.
> And UUCP restarts a dropped transmission exactly where it stopped
> and doesn't try to retransmit the complete message.
>
In /sys/kern/subr_prf.c rev 1.66 and earlier, log(9) printed the
message to the log buffer if the log buffer is being read by a process
(syslogd). If no process is reading the log buffer, the message went
to BOTH the log buffer and the console, as documented in the comment
just above log(9).
/*
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> What's the reason why KI_NGROUPS should be different from NGROUPS_MAX?
None -- ideally, they would be the same. I was reminding him that if he
updated one, he should be sure to update the other.
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Robert Wat
Hi,
Did anyone find a way to compile the x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server port ?
According to the Makefile it is not possible to build it since FreeBSD 500013.
Will a package built under < 500013 work under > 500013 ?
Another way to have DRI/M rendering with mga/G400 and XFree under -current ?
Che
+---[ Sameh Ghane ]--
| Hi,
|
| Did anyone find a way to compile the x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server port ?
|
| According to the Makefile it is not possible to build it since FreeBSD 500013.
| Will a package built under < 500013 work under > 500013 ?
It's busted since the K
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:30:33 -0400
> Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
drosih> On the print *client* machine, you start lpd with '-4', meaning that
drosih> it (the client) should only accept jobs from IPv4-style connections.
drosih> Note that this flag only effects what lpd wil
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 02:50:18PM +0900, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> >> Yet another turn of workaround for psm/ACPI/PnP BIOS problems
> >> currently experienced in -CURRENT.
> >>
> >> This should fix the problem that the PS/2 mouse is detected twice
> >> if the acpi module is not loaded
I did not look at current.FreeBSD.ORG, but at current.jp.FreeBSD.ORG,
the build on the 1st and 2nd October seem to have succeeded.
I tried to install 5.0-CURRENT-20011002-JPSNAP from current.jp.FreeBSD.ORG,
then sysinstall says
mknod of /dev/rad0s1b returned failure status!
and stops at the
Different behaviour from 4.4 to 5.0 of host command. Why?
Yes, I got finally delegation for reverse (with RFC 2317).
Yes, my -CURRENT is really old, but I'm reading this list... ;)
And sorry for long lines with custom formatting.
Using nslookup from either 4.4 and 5.0 give me same results
(trye
This is from -current as of about 1am or so CDT today.
2:51:10pm wahoo(112): burncd -s 12 -f /dev/acd0c data StarOffice52.iso fixate
burncd: ioctl(CDIOCSTART): Device busy
I was under the impression that if the kernel and world were in sync that this would
work based on a message I read yest
I am trying to install -CURRENT on ThinkPad 770ED with a limited success
so far. I noticed that when the kernel boots on this notebook, it
complains about PCI BIOS entry call point not being available. The
following is a boot -v output from my kernel file(see below for further
comments):
Copyrigh
> I am trying to install -CURRENT on ThinkPad 770ED with a limited success
> so far. I noticed that when the kernel boots on this notebook, it
> complains about PCI BIOS entry call point not being available. The
> following is a boot -v output from my kernel file(see below for further
> comments):
I tried to rip CD via dd(1). Usual CDs can be ripped with:
% cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0c info
...
% dd if=/dev/acd0t1 of=track1.raw bs=2352
But track 4 of one CD (which is CD-EXTRA) failed.
% cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0c info
Starting track = 1, ending track = 5, TOC size = 50 bytes
track start d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Alexander N. Kabaev" writes:
: I am trying to install -CURRENT on ThinkPad 770ED with a limited success
: so far. I noticed that when the kernel boots on this notebook, it
: complains about PCI BIOS entry call point not being available. The
: following is a boot -v
Since my latest build of -current (today) I'm getting pages of these:
arp: 00:30:65:48:fd:cc is using my IP address 0.0.0.0!
arp: 00:30:65:48:fd:cc is using my IP address 0.0.0.0!
arp: 00:30:65:48:fd:cc is using my IP address 0.0.0.0!
arp: 00:30:65:48:fd:cc is using my IP address 0.0.0.0!
arp: 00
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:35:14AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > UUCP still gets used. It's one of the few sane ways to handle email in
> > a laptop environment when you're always connecting through different
> > dialups/ISPs. It has mostly fallen out of favour due to ignorance and
> > FUD
Heheh... Just to clarify for some... my standard practice involves following
buildworld with installworld...
Jim Bryant wrote:
> Søren Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Kernel and burncd must be in sync again, a make kernel followed
>> by a make world should do it.
>>
>> -Søren
>
>
>
> acd0: CD-RW at
Is there any way for the loadable module to detect if
the kernel is configured for SMP or UP?
Kazu
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 02:22:31PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> > > POP3 is a mail retriever, designed to retrieve mail for a single user.
> > > It preserves all of the necessary information that a 'receiver' needs.
> > >
> > > Now, if you're doing something that POP3 was never intended to do (i
This just isn't going to work. The _CRS data stream stops at byte 0x17,
and these extra items are simply mis-aimed.
The 0x19 should really be 0x11, and the 0x1c should really be 0x14, ie.
this is a BIOS bug, and should be reported to the vendor. (It should
also have failed the Microsoft ACP
> > yes, with acpi timer disabled this seems to have gone away
>
> Nope, even with the change Mike mentioned, I still get:
>
> microuptime() went backwards (50013.3990440 -> 50012.321555)
> microuptime() went backwards (50013.3990440 -> 50012.406351)
This looks really bad; like time is actually
I dunno. It's an STL2 board with 2 1GHz processors and 1GB of memory.
It doesn't always happen. I'm running ntp.
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > yes, with acpi timer disabled this seems to have gone away
> >
> > Nope, even with the change Mike mentioned, I still get:
> >
> > micro
It also mostly seems to be happening during boot probing- probably when my FC
kernel thread is running. That may be a clue.
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> I dunno. It's an STL2 board with 2 1GHz processors and 1GB of memory.
> It doesn't always happen. I'm running ntp.
>
>
>
> On
There have been a number of permission-related changes in the tree of
late, in particular relating to securelevel support. I haven't
experienced any local problems running the new code, but there is always
the potential for such a problem, especially in areas of the code I'm not
actively using.
Søren Schmidt wrote:
> Kernel and burncd must be in sync again, a make kernel followed
> by a make world should do it.
>
> -Søren
acd0: CD-RW at ata1-master PIO4
This is from -current as of about 1am or so CDT today. I did a make buildworld
instead of a make world, but I would assume that
I've been seeing these too on the Inspiron 7500..
-current from about 1 week ago.
On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > yes, with acpi timer disabled this seems to have gone away
> >
> > Nope, even with the change Mike mentioned, I still get:
> >
> > microuptime() went backwards (50013
Probably, the reason is to still have a working KINFO_PROC_SIZE even
if the user modifies NGROUPS_MAX?
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:12:45AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > What's the reason why KI_NGROUPS should be different from NGROUPS_MAX?
>
> N
> POP and IMAP (I think) will lose all the envelope information,
You've been listening to Terry too long. It's certainly not the case,
although I've decided to quit arguing with Terry, since it's an
excercise in futility. No matter what you say, he'll either change the
subject or simply overwhe
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 09:34:17AM -0600, Nate Williams wrote:
> > POP and IMAP (I think) will lose all the envelope information,
>
> You've been listening to Terry too long. It's certainly not the case,
> although I've decided to quit arguing with Terry, since it's an
> excercise in futility.
At 2:19 PM +0200 10/1/01, Alexander Langer wrote:
>
>> alex> 15329 ?? S 0:00.02 lpd -4
>> alex> alex@oink ~ $ lpq
> > alex> lpd: Host name for your address
>(fe80::250:baff:fed4:a512%xl0) unknown
>
>I started lpd on this machine: (with the -4 flag, see above).
>alex@oink ~ $ uname -a ;
35 matches
Mail list logo
