Probably, the reason is to still have a working KINFO_PROC_SIZE even if the user modifies NGROUPS_MAX?
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 08:12:45AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > What's the reason why KI_NGROUPS should be different from NGROUPS_MAX? > > None -- ideally, they would be the same. I was reminding him that if he > updated one, he should be sure to update the other. > > > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 05:04:51PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > > > > > > Note this will break binary compatibility for xucred. Note also that this > > > may have fascinating effects in NFS environments. Note also that you'll > > > probably want to update KI_NGROUPS also. No idea if it will affect NIS. -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG, [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
