make release broken in telnetd

2001-03-28 Thread John Hay
Hi Ruslan, On the 26th you made changes to the Makefiles with this log message: ## Do not build (and install) both secure/ and standard versions of libtelnet, telnetd, and telnet. This only worked because secure/ was listed late in SUBDIR in Makefile.inc1. ## Did you chec

fsck pass sanitizing patch

2001-03-28 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I have put up a patch which sanitizes the fsck passno handling, you will find it at http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/ Apologies to Kirk if this conflics with any of his work on delayed fsck... 20010328fsck.patch This patch sanitizes the way fsck deals with pass numbers

Re: make release broken in telnetd

2001-03-28 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hi! I don't see how my changes to non-secure Makefiles might affect this. What I did is disabled building of non-secure, standard libtelnet, telnet and telnetd if we are also building the secure versions. I did not touch the secure/ versions in this commit. Moreover, the standard versions are st

Re: ACL support in 5.0-CURRENT (was: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files options src/sys/ufs/ufs acl.h ufs_acl.c ufs_vnops.c (fwd))

2001-03-28 Thread Alex Kapranoff
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:14:38PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > After the EA backing files are initialized, you can manually start the > EA's on the file system, or if UFS_EXTATTR_AUTOSTART is enabled, simply > remount the file systems, or reboot the system. To manually start and > enable the at

Fun way to panic -current

2001-03-28 Thread Terry Lambert
Run the 4.3 mountd on it. Boom! Kernel memory allocation way to large; unrecoverable! Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.

RE: HEADS UP: I'm breaking the kernel again

2001-03-28 Thread John Baldwin
On 28-Mar-01 John Baldwin wrote: > > On 28-Mar-01 John Baldwin wrote: >> That's right, more SMPng breakage is on the way. Well, hopefully not bad >> breakage. On a more serious note, I've just spammed sys/alpha/alpha with >> parts >> of the critical_enter/exit change which I meant to commit an

RE: Fun way to panic -current

2001-03-28 Thread John Baldwin
On 28-Mar-01 Terry Lambert wrote: > Run the 4.3 mountd on it. > > Boom! Kernel memory allocation way to large; unrecoverable! Yes, struct ucred sucks. In -current the userland now uses a static struct xucred that doesn't contain things like mutexes and thus mountd shouldn't crash in current a

GENERIC Doesn't compile...

2001-03-28 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
===> wi @ -> /mnt/src/sys machine -> /mnt/src/sys/i386/include perl @/kern/makeobjops.pl -h @/dev/pccard/card_if.m perl @/kern/makeobjops.pl -h @/kern/device_if.m perl @/kern/makeobjops.pl -h @/kern/bus_if.m rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/dev

Re: GENERIC Doesn't compile...

2001-03-28 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010328 05:38] wrote: > > ===> wi > @ -> /mnt/src/sys > machine -> /mnt/src/sys/i386/include > perl @/kern/makeobjops.pl -h @/dev/pccard/card_if.m > perl @/kern/makeobjops.pl -h @/kern/device_if.m > perl @/kern/makeobjops.pl -h @/kern/bus_if.m > rm -f .depe

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-28 Thread Peter Wemm
Doug Barton wrote: > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > > > the idea is, that if rpcbind takes parameters different from portmap it > > would make sense to call rpcbind rpcbind because people's boxes will > > start to barf when rpcbind is called portmap, they make world, and skip > > reading the rpcb

Re: fsck pass sanitizing patch

2001-03-28 Thread Chris Dillon
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > There is no way to tell it that ccd0c overlaps ad0 and ad1. > > With the patch, it will do it this way: > > pass 2: > One process doing ad0s1e > One process doing ad1s1e and ad1s1f > > and when they ar

Re: fsck pass sanitizing patch

2001-03-28 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chr is Dillon writes: >On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> There is no way to tell it that ccd0c overlaps ad0 and ad1. >> >> With the patch, it will do it this way: >> >> pass 2: >> One process doing ad0s1e >> O

RE: Fun way to panic -current

2001-03-28 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > On 28-Mar-01 Terry Lambert wrote: > > Run the 4.3 mountd on it. > > > > Boom! Kernel memory allocation way to large; unrecoverable! Does this really panic -current? It panics old versions of -current, and the -current mountd panics RELENG_4, but curr

chmod 666 /dev/null

2001-03-28 Thread Stephan van Beerschoten
I just rebooted my machine with the cvupped-and-compiled world and kernel, I logged on and did the following: (stephanb@enigma|ttyp4)~> w w: /dev/null: Permission denied Checking out /dev/null gave me this: crw--- 1 root wheel2, 2 Mar 28 20:00 /dev/null I had to chmod it to 666 agai

Re: chmod 666 /dev/null

2001-03-28 Thread Stephan van Beerschoten
Ouch .. ok this was meant to go to -stable. I don't know what made me sent this to -current.. damn. I'll cc this reply to -stable. My apologies. Anyway, I forgot to mention some into.. I do not have DEVFS in my kernel and this is my kernel: FreeBSD enigma.whacky.net 4.3-RC FreeBSD 4.3-RC #0: W

Re: chmod 666 /dev/null

2001-03-28 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Stephan van Beerschoten wrote: > I just rebooted my machine with the cvupped-and-compiled world > and kernel, I logged on and did the following: > > (stephanb@enigma|ttyp4)~> w > w: /dev/null: Permission denied > > Checking out /dev/null gave me this: > crw--- 1 root wheel2, 2 Mar 28

Re: cvsupit assumptions (was: Re: Re[2]: Can't build current...)

2001-03-28 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hello Robert, Tuesday, March 27, 2001, 8:19:42 PM, you wrote: > I've actually heard that from a couple of other people lately -- that > cvsupit still assumes that crypto should not be pulled down, and the > crypto code is now assumed in the default build. Thi

lockup after resume

2001-03-28 Thread Georg-W. Koltermann
I am experiencing a strange lockup with -current as of about a week ago: It will suspend and resume, but after the resume the console is dead and the system hangs after a short while. When I type on the console after a resume, nothing is shown, neither echo nor command output. If I break into DD

NEWCARD broken in -current

2001-03-28 Thread Jesper Skriver
cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev -I/usr/src/sys/../include -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/Subsystem/Include

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-28 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Peter Wemm([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.03.28/06:24:34(epoch+985757074s): > FYI: > > SYNOPSIS > portmap [-d] [-v] > > SYNOPSIS > rpcbind [-dilLs] yup, so i think it makes sense, to have the daemon called rpcbind, since it would probably break other people's configuration after making world

Re: NEWCARD broken in -current

2001-03-28 Thread Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:09:28PM +0200, Jesper Skriver wrote: > cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes >-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi >-nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev -I/usr/src

Re: cvsupit assumptions (was: Re: Re[2]: Can't build current...)

2001-03-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:15:51PM +0200, Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: > Oh and while I'm on it: where is src/crypto/rijndael in the CVS? in src/sys/crypto/rijndael :-) > CVSWEB doesn't find it, neither does it get downloaded (this time > using a complete supfile ;-)... You need the src-sys-crypto c

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-28 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Karsten W. Rohrbach" writes: : Peter Wemm([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.03.28/06:24:34(epoch+985757074s): : > FYI: : > : > SYNOPSIS : > portmap [-d] [-v] : > : > SYNOPSIS : > rpcbind [-dilLs] : : yup, so i think it makes sense, to have the daemon called rpcbi

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:14:07PM +0200, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > Peter Wemm([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.03.28/06:24:34(epoch+985757074s): Drop this useless discussion, or take me off the blooming CC: list. Learn to use your editor! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscri

Re: NEWCARD broken in -current

2001-03-28 Thread Jesper Skriver
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:15:21PM +0200, Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:09:28PM +0200, Jesper Skriver wrote: > > cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes >-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extens

Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind

2001-03-28 Thread Robert Watson
> I do not. -v could easily be added to what is now rpcbind (even if it > was ignored). -d mean the same thing for both. there's then no reason > to change its name. Well, my feeling on the matter, since everyone gets to have an opinion today, is that we should stick with rpcbind: it's what e

Building aout ports in -current

2001-03-28 Thread Conrad Sabatier
I've been notified that one of the ports I'm responsible for, xswallow, will no longer build under -current. Here's a snip from the build log: ===> Building for xswallow-1.0.18 cd /tmp/a/ports/www/xswallow/work/xswallow/xswallow && cc -O -pipe -o xswallow.so -aout -shared -nostdlib -DXP_UNIX -

Re: Building aout ports in -current

2001-03-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:20:33PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > I've been notified that one of the ports I'm responsible for, xswallow, will no > longer build under -current. Here's a snip from the build log: a.out support is entirely optional thesedays for ports, so it's up to you whether or

Re: Building aout ports in -current

2001-03-28 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 29-Mar-2001 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 10:20:33PM -0600, Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> I've been notified that one of the ports I'm responsible for, xswallow, will >> no longer build under -current. Here's a snip from the build log: > > a.out support is entirely optional thes