On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 02:58:16AM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
> >The other day, on a whim, I decided to try running an old binary
> >of SimCity (the same one found in the 'commerce' directory on
> >many FBSD cds), and it failed in a odd way...
Does anyone have any old a.out binaries other than S
Looks like you got a lot farther than I did with it... Are you
sure you don't have an old aout ld.so on that machine? Here's
what I get:
>dmaddox> SimCity
Starting SimCity ...
SimCity Classic - UNIX / Tcl & Tk Toolkit version 3.6b - Mattes
/usr/libexec/ld.so: Undefined symbol "___error" called
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 02:58:16AM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
> This has been broken for new users for some time. :-( Those of us
> upgrading from source have been immune to this problem, because we
> retain the old a.out ld.so binary.
>
> >/usr/libexec/ld.so: Undefined symbol "___error" called
Actually, the aout libs I am using when I get the ___error undefined
are the ones from the XFree86-3.3.6 distribution, compiled for
FreeBSD 3.x. Originally I was using the aout X libs I built myself
when building the XFree86-3.3.6 port. Using those, I still got an
undefined symbol, but it wasn'
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 03:57:07AM -0500, Donald J . Maddox wrote:
> Looks like you got a lot farther than I did with it... Are you
> sure you don't have an old aout ld.so on that machine?
Nope. This is a box that was a virgin install of 5-CURRENT a month ago.
I had to install the compat20 and
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:52:23AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> Nope. This is a box that was a virgin install of 5-CURRENT a month ago.
> I had to install the compat20 and compat21 dists, along with doing a
> ``pkg_add -r XFree86-aoutlibs''. The Tk is 8.0.5.
The XFree86-aoutlibs are espec
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:52:23AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 03:57:07AM -0500, Donald J . Maddox wrote:
> > Looks like you got a lot farther than I did with it... Are you
> > sure you don't have an old aout ld.so on that machine?
>
> Nope. This is a box that was a vi
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:09:45AM -0500, Donald J . Maddox wrote:
> >res> ldd sim
> sim:
> -lXext.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/aout/libXext.so.6.3 (0x200c5000)
> -lX11.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/aout/libX11.so.6.1 (0x200cf000)
> -lc.2 => /usr/lib/compat/aout/libc.so.2.2 (0x20166000)
> -lm
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 02:24:26AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:09:45AM -0500, Donald J . Maddox wrote:
> > >res> ldd sim
> > sim:
> > -lXext.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/aout/libXext.so.6.3 (0x200c5000)
> > -lX11.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/aout/libX11.so.6.1 (0x200cf000)
> >
Interesting. After I installed the XFree86-aoutlibs port, SimCity
works fine for me (on an 8-bit display)...
It didn't work with the X libs built by the port when aout libs
are requested, and it didn't work with the X libs from 3.3.6, but
it works with these.
> > Looks good. Can you install th
On Wednesday, 20th December 2000, "David O'Brien" wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 02:58:16AM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
>> This has been broken for new users for some time. :-( Those of us
>> upgrading from source have been immune to this problem, because we
>> retain the old a.out ld.so binary
On Wednesday, 20th December 2000, "Donald J . Maddox" wrote:
>> > Looks good. Can you install the XFree896-aoutlib port? You may have
>> > seen were someone posted the a.out libs from 3.3.6 are known to not be
>> > the the best to use for compatibility use.
>
>Interesting. After I installed the
Recently, we have a module of 'lnc' ethernet. Maybe it's the last
ethernet driver converted to newbus framework IIRC. Very thank you.
However, this kernel module is named as 'lnc.ko'. Other ethernet
driver modules are named as 'if_XXX.ko'; why lnc doesn't obey this
name convension? Typo, or a ne
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Makoto MATSUSHITA-san writes:
: However, this kernel module is named as 'lnc.ko'. Other ethernet
: driver modules are named as 'if_XXX.ko'; why lnc doesn't obey this
: name convension? Typo, or a new name scheme is used instead?
Typo, I think. The module needs to b
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:28:06PM +1030, Matthew Thyer wrote:
> Michael Class wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > i am seeing a problem with 5.0-current (from 14.12.00) and a 3COM
> > 3CCFE575CT Lancard (pc-cardbus) using the xl-driver.
>
> [snip]
>
> > Why behaves my FreeBSD-machines worse then th
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:15:55PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
> Correcting slightly for your slightly off assumption: The X11 libs were
> probably built on a 3.x box. Their problem is that being newer than
> libc.so.2.2 (or was it libc.so.3.0) they use ___error but libc does not
> supply it. My
imp> Typo, I think. The module needs to be named if_XXX.ko for the
imp> automatic kldload in ifconfig to work.
OK, attached below is a (trivial) patch to fix this.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /lab/F
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:14:09AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:15:55PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
> > Correcting slightly for your slightly off assumption: The X11 libs were
> > probably built on a 3.x box. Their problem is that being newer than
> > libc.so.2.2 (or w
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:28:45AM -0500, Donald J . Maddox wrote:
> > > Heh :) You don't have to dink around with your config... Just do
> > > 'startx -- -bpp 8'.
> > You assume I'm using an XFree86 server ;-) -- I am not.
>
> How can you be using the same X libs as me, and not be using
> XFre
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:43:39AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 05:28:45AM -0500, Donald J . Maddox wrote:
> >
> > How can you be using the same X libs as me, and not be using
> > XFree86?
>
> XFree86 has many components to it -- binaries (such as Xterm), libs (such
> as
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Makoto MATSUSHITA writes:
: imp> Typo, I think. The module needs to be named if_XXX.ko for the
: imp> automatic kldload in ifconfig to work.
:
: OK, attached below is a (trivial) patch to fix this.
This is a good start at a fix. However, all the attachments for t
Title:
We've already paid out over a cool MILLION
DOLLARS to
WINNERS just like YOU.
Enter the Finest, Highest Paying Casino Online
$25,000 WINNERS are cashing in at our casino
DAILY.
Grab YOUR share of this wealth pool and open an account now. We'll bring the
finest, most secure, high
How to open && read file from kernel space. I have seen VOP_[READ,OPEN]
but i think there's something easiest ?
--
_ __ __
/ \ | | / / / \ / \ -- Tomasz Paszkowski --- NS88-6BONE
| |\ \| | \ \ |/ \||/ \| === BSD is for people who love Unix =
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tomasz Paszkowski writes:
>
> How to open && read file from kernel space. I have seen VOP_[READ,OPEN]
> but i think there's something easiest ?
VOP_* is the way to go.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:52:05PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > How to open && read file from kernel space. I have seen VOP_[READ,OPEN]
> > but i think there's something easiest ?
>
> VOP_* is the way to go.
:(( So I'll have a long night
--
_ __ __
/ \ | | / / /
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tomasz Paszkowski writes:
>On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:52:05PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> > How to open && read file from kernel space. I have seen VOP_[READ,OPEN]
>> > but i think there's something easiest ?
>>
>> VOP_* is the way to go.
>
> :(( So I'll hav
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:10:53PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Sorry, yes...
>
> ktrace, various accounting and of course open(2) will be the best
> places to start.
>
> In all likely hood you're trying to do something the wrong way
> though...
I'm trying to open file located on /, from
imp> This is a good start at a fix. However, all the attachments for the
imp> lnc device also need to be called if_lnc. And they need to share the
imp> same devclass_t so that unit numbers don't go wonky on you (eg, if you
imp> have a isa and a pci lnc card in the same system, you might get two
On Wednesday, 20th December 2000, "Donald J . Maddox" wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 10:14:09AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 11:15:55PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
>> > Correcting slightly for your slightly off assumption: The X11 libs were
>> > probably built on a 3.x
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Makoto MATSUSHITA writes:
: Hmm, fixing these are beyond my skill...
I'll go ahead and fix it, or make sure it does.
: BTW, are there anybody working on 'pcn' (yet another lance driver) to
: work with VMware ? Current 5-current installation floppy makes VMware
: pa
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 02:05:20AM -0800, Jeremy Lea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 01:52:23AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Nope. This is a box that was a virgin install of 5-CURRENT a month ago.
> > I had to install the compat20 and compat21 dists, along with doing a
> > ``pkg_add
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 07:13:05PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Argh. I'm going to have to mark that port FORBIDDEN, then, because old
> versions of the X libraries have remote vulnerabilities.
Hmmm... Are there patches available to just fix the security problems?
We can't move much beyon
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 07:13:05PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Argh. I'm going to have to mark that port FORBIDDEN, then, because old
> > versions of the X libraries have remote vulnerabilities.
>
> Hmmm... Are there patches available to just fix the security problems?
> We can't move
33 matches
Mail list logo