* From: Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Hi -current and -ports,
*
* I've noticed something that seems to have been broken for a long time.
* In etc/defaults/make.conf we have several MASTER_SITE_* variables which
* reference "%SUBDIR%". However, these variables do not work as expected.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 09:41:57AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Am I the only person who miss a brief document which tells what
> the outcome of the meeting was ?
I'm at USENIX right now, so I'm a bit strapped for time to work on this.
Still, I plan to email a brief summary of the meeting
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:35:51AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> why there isn't an exportfs command as most unices have ?
"killall -HUP mountd" or "mount -u /" both work. This is mentioned
in the mountd man page, but should probably also be mentioned in
the exports man page.
David.
What about shared interrupts? How are they going to be treated? With the
spl leaving the arena it somehow looks feasible to run one interrupt
source on two different threads if there are two pieces of hardware
attached to the same interrupt line.
>From what I understood from dfr, when switching
More over, unlike other big project like CAM, this baby is going to
touch the gut of the OS.
It might be possible however for individual projects to move into a
separate branch.
Nick
> >What about doing the changes on a branch with the understanding that
> >the branch will *replace* HEAD when
CAM is not a valid example. It only touched the disk subsystem.
Merging back changes in blocks might not be possible. As Matthew
mentioned, Chuck's experience should be taken for a fact.
And bounding the amount of breakage is almost impossible without
squeezing the people doing the SMP work rea
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 08:14:41PM +0200, Narvi wrote:
>
> You obviously haven't considered the ability to be able to near hot-swap
> motherboard and cpu - or even RAM - in this way.
>
You're right! I hadn't! (Although I've dreamed about it a few times).
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Narvi
>writes:
> : You obviously haven't considered the ability to be able to near hot-swap
> : motherboard and cpu - or even RAM - in this way.
>
> The ACPI spec specifically states that one cannot disassemble a
> machi
Alexander Langer wrote:
>> You probably have a symlink in the client path somewhere. Is /usr/home
>> a symlink to /home or something?
>
> drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 512 6 Mär 14:45 /usr/home/
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 9 27 Feb 20:33 /home@ -> /usr/home
ok, that's not it, the /home symlink
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:- "CVS branches suck" is the reason I belive.
Bitkeeper?
--
Robert Withrow -- (+1 978 288 8256)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
(Moving this to freebsd-smp, Bcc'ing current)
:What about shared interrupts? How are they going to be treated? With the
:spl leaving the arena it somehow looks feasible to run one interrupt
:source on two different threads if there are two pieces of hardware
:attached to the same interrupt li
I made a sed script to ease migration of kernel configuration files from
the few-weeks-ago-CURRENT to current-CURRENT, and thought I might as well
share it since it makes things easy (autonomous :)
You can find it at
http://people.freebsd.org/~green/oldconfig2new
It requires extended regu
On Tuesday, 20 June 2000 at 9:41:57 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> Am I the only person who miss a brief document which tells what
> the outcome of the meeting was ?
I'm writing up a detailed trip report for my company. I can't see why
I shouldn't forward it to the SMP list as well, but I
On Tuesday, 20 June 2000 at 12:57:41 -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>> I think core has approved in principle, and several core members
>> were present at the meeting (at least peter, dg, gibbs, dfr), that
>> being said, I think we need to s
On Tuesday, 20 June 2000 at 11:16:24 +0200, Martin Cracauer wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>
>> Am I the only person who miss a brief document which tells what
>> the outcome of the meeting was ?
>
> Who was there, anyway?
>From my trip report. This can hardly be conf
I think it should *definitely* be in the base system. :)
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
>
> > Out of curiosity, are there any plans to commit the smbfs stuff? It is
> > really useful and I'd love to see it in the base system.
>
> Yes, I'm get much more responses about
Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who
recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything.
Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to
change. :)
- Jordan
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> :- "CVS branches suck" is the reason I belive.
>
> Bitke
In message <12213.961613148@localhost> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes:
: Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who
: recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything.
: Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to
: change. :)
In that case, I'd recomme
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Eaglez writes:
: Well, i'm not sure about 5.0's new funky support (i
: mean, if it supports the SB Live, who knows), but in
: the past, PCI modems have never been supported,
: because they all tend to be win modems (only MS
: windows drivers available). I'd advise po
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: Watch out - some USB modems are also WinModems.
usb tty and modems aren't supported, as far as I know. How can you
tell the usb modems that are win modems? And can y ou get docs on
them?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It seems Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <12213.961613148@localhost> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes:
> : Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who
> : recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything.
> : Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to
> :
David Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 02:35:51AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
>
> > why there isn't an exportfs command as most unices have ?
>
> "killall -HUP mountd" or "mount -u /" both work. This is mentioned
> in the mountd man page, but should probably also b
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: > a larger issue. It is not the loader's job to detect the underlying
: > hardware configuration.
:
: Actually, in a broad fashion, it _is_. This is why the loader
: understands PCI and PnP, for example.
How hard would it be to add usb and pc
At 9:34 PM +0200 2000/6/21, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> Using a non opensource commercial version control system is just
> to ask for bad carma, extended murphy fields and whatnot in an
> opensource volounteer project...
Has anyone given any thought to what it would take to create an
open
Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I made a sed script to ease migration of kernel configuration files from
> the few-weeks-ago-CURRENT to current-CURRENT, and thought I might as well
> share it since it makes things easy (autonomous :)
>
> You can find it at
> http://
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andrzej Bialecki
writes:
: That's fine. However, this practically makes using /boot/loader
: mandatory. I still wonder if having some in-kernel interpreter wouldn't
: give us more choice, with exactly the same functionality. Of course, it
: would have to be run befo
> "Cyrille" == Cyrille Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Cyrille> well, at 4.x, FreeBSD sed doesn't support -E, is that GNU sed
Cyrille> which support this option or 5.x FreeBSD sed ? for instance,
Cyrille> GNU sed port doesn't exists !
FreeBSD-Current sed supports -E option...
--
--
Eivind Elkund was talking about doing something like
this. He had a pretty nice document about it,
too. If I recall, the name was "OVCS: Open Version Control System"
Perhaps someone could fill in the blanks? I couldn't
find the document at the address I thought it was kept,
http://yes.no/perha
> Has anyone given any thought to what it would take to create an
> open source version of something similar to perforce? ;-)
Clearly you have. :-). We await your submissions with baited breath...
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send m
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>
> That's fine. However, this practically makes using /boot/loader
> mandatory. I still wonder if having some in-kernel interpreter wouldn't
> give us more choice, with exactly the same functionality. Of course, it
> would have to be run before any probing starts...
If y
Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I made a sed script to ease migration of kernel configuration files from
> the few-weeks-ago-CURRENT to current-CURRENT, and thought I might as well
> share it since it makes things easy (autonomous :)
>
> You can find it at
> http://
At 11:09 PM +0200 2000/6/21, Mark Murray wrote:
>> Has anyone given any thought to what it would take to create an
>> open source version of something similar to perforce? ;-)
>
> Clearly you have. :-). We await your submissions with baited breath...
If you're waiting for me on t
At 5:00 PM -0400 2000/6/21, Dan Papasian wrote:
> Eivind Elkund was talking about doing something like
> this. He had a pretty nice document about it,
> too. If I recall, the name was "OVCS: Open Version Control System"
Hmm. So far, Google hasn't been particularly useful in trying
I am not sure if people here are aware of Subversion which is CVS
redesigned to rip out its bad features. It's not ready yet though :-(
http://subversion.tigris.org/
More info on the Tigris project can be found here
http://www.tigris.org/
Cheers, Yusuf
--
Yusuf Goolamabbas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hello!
>
> Today I wanted to add a new NFS to my /etc/fstab, but forgot to add it
> to /etc/exports on the server.
> However, I did mount -a several times and always got a "Permission
> denied" for the last one.
>
> Now look what I have here:
>
> Filesystem 1K-blocks
I would like to commit the patch below to -current and 4-stable in a
little while. It allows KLDs to be compiled without optimization.
Any objections/comments/anything?
/assar
Index: signalvar.h
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/sy
I think it's wrong that vnode_if.h is not installed, this means that
you need to have kernel source to compile any third-party file system.
So I propose the patch below, to create vnode_if.h and then add it to CVS.
Any objectsions/comments/whatever?
/assar
Index: Makefile
=
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Mark Murray wrote:
> > Has anyone given any thought to what it would take to create an
> > open source version of something similar to perforce? ;-)
>
> Clearly you have. :-). We await your submissions with baited breath...
I have mixed feelings about that. The Perfo
Building world failed on my machine... (with USA_RESIDENT=NO)
Does IDEA stuff compiled by default?
===> libssh
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a-DSKEY -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include
/usr/src/secure/lib/libssh/../../../crypto/openssh/authfd.c
/usr/src/secure/lib/libssh/../../../cryp
< said:
> So I propose the patch below, to create vnode_if.h and then add it to CVS.
> Any objectsions/comments/whatever?
Yes.
There are too many generated files in CVS as it is.
If there is a problem here, the correct fix is to supply the source
files, not the generated output.
-GAWollman
Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> < said:
>
> > So I propose the patch below, to create vnode_if.h and then add it to CVS.
>
> There are too many generated files in CVS as it is.
>
> If there is a problem here, the correct fix is to supply the source
> files, not the generated outp
>From Daemon news:
Kirk McKusick announced this morning at the USENIX keynote that the
softupdates code will now be available under a BSD license. Details
to follow.
So does this mean the whole shebang of find/read/link/recompile can finally
end? NetBSD got rid of this ages ago.
-George
T
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 12:09:02AM -0700, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> Waitaminit. These are correct, please look at bsd.sites.mk. What
> makes you think they are not working?
Hmm... weird. I tried using the overrides in make.conf some time ago
and they didn't work and I had to use
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, George Michaelson wrote:
>So does this mean the whole shebang of find/read/link/recompile can finally
>end? NetBSD got rid of this ages ago.
Well Kirk McKusick has already committed the license change, a la:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=524952+0+current/cvs-a
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 09:50:57PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> well, what about exporting a directory w/o exporting a filesystem ?
> which is usefull somethimes. possible too ?
Add the directory to exports and HUP mountd. (I think that in the
kernel the exports are at a filesystem level, so
45 matches
Mail list logo
