On Sun, 9 Apr 2000, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Matthew Sean Thyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I stopped the messages by adding the following line below the rshd
> > line in /etc/pam.conf
> >
> > rshdauthrequiredpam_permit.so
>
> The way PAM
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matthew Sean Thyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The way PAM works, that will let _anybody_ login via rsh without a
> > password. I don't think it's what you want.
>
> Wont this only happen when rshd becomes PAMerised ? or has that
> happened already ?
I haven'
Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS SPS Perth wrote:
>
> It needed the libjpeg & libgtk rpms from the RedHat 6.1 CD (perhaps these
> could be added to Linux_base?)
Hmmm... I think we may as well break up linux_base in that case.
linux_base is rather big as it is...
Thanks for the feedback.
-
I've had a good deal of success getting Mozilla to build straight out of the
nightly source tar files:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/mozilla-source.tar.gz
I recommend installing the jpeg and png libraries out of the ports tree and
using a ~/.mozconfig with the following lines:
According to Christoph Kukulies:
> echo "#define NETGRAPH_MPPC_ENCRYPTION 1" >> opt_netgraph.h
> make: don't know how to make rc4.c. Stop
I guess you're like me and using the crypto code from internat ? The rc4 code
is not yet there so it fails...
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Ser
Good afternoon,
Nemeth Martin has an immediate need for a Peoplesoft Functional Higher Education
Student Financials consultant. Experience with version 7.6 is required. The ability
to convert legacy receivable records to the technical team, deliverable to be
written in specification for a mai
Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> > Hmmm... I think we may as well break up linux_base in that case.
> > linux_base is rather big as it is...
> While you are at it, could you please add the pam-0.68-7.i386.rpm to
> linux_devtools? It is needed by the SAP R/3 Installer.
I don't think pam is a develop
Hi,
> Hmmm... I think we may as well break up linux_base in that case.
> linux_base is rather big as it is...
While you are at it, could you please add the pam-0.68-7.i386.rpm to
linux_devtools? It is needed by the SAP R/3 Installer.
Bye!
Michael Reifenberger
^.*Plaut.*$, IT, R/3 Basis, GPS
On 11 Apr 2000, Dr. Brain wrote:
> I've had a good deal of success getting Mozilla to build straight out of the
> nightly source tar files:
> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/nightly/latest/mozilla-source.tar.gz
>
> I recommend installing the jpeg and png libraries out of the ports tree and
>
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
...
> I don't think pam is a development tool, which makes linux_devtools the
> wrong port. I also don't think we need pam in any other port if it's
> needed in only one or two situations. Since the ports use rpms, you can
> always, and are free, to ins
Hi,
looking at directories on a mounted CDROM returns fewer files under the
linuxerator as watched under a native account.
What I did:
I have burned my /usr/bin content on CD using mkisofs.
(mkisofs ...-d -D -l -L -N -r -T... if this is of interest but
I could reproduce the same effect with
[cc'd to -emulation. Please remove -current when replying to this]
Michael Reifenberger wrote:
[snip]
> FreeBSD
> # ls /mnt/acd/usr/bin/ | wc -l
> 425
[snip]
> Linux
> # ls /mnt/acd/usr/bin|wc -l
> 28
[snip]
> FreeBSD is -current, Linux is linux_base and linux_dev
Looks like this phenomenon isn't connected with CDROM. Actually, I see it
rather often with file selectors in Linux apps here (like Netscape when
choosing local file, StarOffice etc.): some files/dirs are missing.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Michael Reifenberger wrote:
> Hi,
> looking at directories o
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, in a never-ending search for enlightenment, Vladimir Kushnir
wrote:
> Looks like this phenomenon isn't connected with CDROM. Actually, I see it
> rather often with file selectors in Linux apps here (like Netscape when
> choosing local file, StarOffice etc.): some files/dirs a
first, is a "make release" of a 5.0-current snapshot supposed to be
possible on 4-stable? It seems to be failing here, but perhaps I'm just
dumb in hoping it would work to start with. :-)
===> sys/modules/tx
@ -> /usr/src/sys
machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include
touch opt_bdg.h
perl @/kern/makeo
I looked through the archives but I didn't see much current on the
subject (esp. under 4.0).
I have two different machines, both with AsusP5A motherboards and
Western Digital Caviar hard drives that should support UDMA/33, as should
the Chipset.
Both boot up, trying UDMA mode, throwing ICRC READ
* From: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Hmmm... I think we may as well break up linux_base in that case.
* linux_base is rather big as it is...
I was thinking about that too. Maybe you can make a few Linux library
ports ("linux_graphics" etc.) so people who want to do something small
On 11 Apr 2000, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> I was thinking about that too. Maybe you can make a few Linux library
> ports ("linux_graphics" etc.) so people who want to do something small
> don't necessarily have to install the whole enchilada.
>
> Please talk to me about repository
> At 2:44 PM -0400 2000/4/9, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
>
> > The advantage would be that we can have a fairly decent qmail
> configuration
> > using the standard make world feature.
> >
> > Is there any interest in that kind of work ?
>
> Considering the number of qmail-specific piece
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 12:23:07AM +0100, Ben Smithurst wrote:
> usr/src/sys/modules/tx/../../pci/if_tx.c
> /usr/src/sys/modules/tx/../../pci/if_tx.c:68: bpf.h: No such file or directory
> mkdep: compile failed
I have the same problem making world. Apparently bpf.h sits in the kernel
compile dire
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 05:21:24PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> While it is fantastic that FreeBSD comes out of the box so fully
> functional, it does make it a bit of a pain for those of us who intend
> to build servers - we have to disable the original before installing a
> new package. :-/
man m
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 05:21:24PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > While it is fantastic that FreeBSD comes out of the box so fully
> > functional, it does make it a bit of a pain for those of us who intend
> > to build servers - we have to disable the original before installing a
> > new package.
Hello everybody!
Although I konw that this thread has moved to -emulation but I would like to
throw in just a last piece of information... I think we are looking at
different issues here... the thing that several files are not shown in the
*same* filesystem and directory is the
part I do not unde
On Tue, 11 Apr 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
...
> Do you see this on other filesystems as well?
No.
>
> BTW: How old are your linux_base and linux_devtools ports?
RH6.1 based as of a few months ago.
Bye!
Michael Reifenberger
^.*Plaut.*$, IT, R/3 Basis, GPS
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [
24 matches
Mail list logo
