Hi all,
I have cvsupped and tried to build world mutiple times over the past 3
days, each time I get the same error. I have been following the mailing
lists and don't see any other complaints.. So I'm sure the trouble is
with my machine...
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libcrypto.so: undefine
At 12:24 PM -0500 2000/3/3, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> I'm just wondering -- when is RC3 expected? ? A lot has happened
> since the 2/14 snap.
Well, Jordan is over here in the Netherlands (at the kickoff
meeting for the NL FreeBSD Users Group), so it's likely to be at
least a few more
At 12:24 PM 3/3/00 -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
>I'm just wondering -- when is RC3 expected? ? A lot has happened
>since the 2/14 snap..
Try the 2/28 snap, unless another has been made within the day.
Doubtful.
At lot is still happening, so the 3/10 release will be changed.
Jeff Mountin -
> >I've been messing about with IPSEC in 4.0-current, and have observed some
> >unexpected behavior. Is there someone I can swap some email with off
> >the list to determine if what I'm seeing is a bug, or I'm just confused?
> >It has to do with security policy specifications and what SAID is bei
Are you building with -DNOSHARE? That is the only way I can think of off the
top of my head.
Jim Bloom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeff Palmer wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have cvsupped and tried to build world mutiple times over the past 3
> days, each time I get the same error. I have been following th
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Christopher Masto wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 11:28:13AM -0800, John Polstra wrote:
> > > It takes no more than a well-designed operating system service to
> > > ensure that badly written programs don't fail to release resources
> > > when they crash.
> >
> > We didn't
William Woods wrote:
> vm/vnode_pager.h -> vm/vnode_pager.ph
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/utils/h2ph.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Ideas about what died and why?
I got the same thing here. h2ph does not like /usr/include/des.h
which is a symlink to /usr/include/openssl/d
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 01:00:33AM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> > current.freebsd.org is currently down due to a hardware failure. I don't
> > have an ETA on when it will be back up again, due to it being offsite.
> > I'll post more info as it becomes available.
>
> Usually hardware and softw
At 11:30 AM +0100 2000/3/4, Brad Knowles wrote:
> Well, Jordan is over here in the Netherlands (at the kickoff meeting for
> the NL FreeBSD Users Group), so it's likely to be at least a few more days.
I spoke with Jordan at the meeting, and it seems that there is
the chance it ma
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 03:06:55PM -0800, Joel Ray Holveck wrote:
> [Followups to -current]
>
> >>I am running monday's current, Mesa-glx for Riva, XFree 3.3.6 and
> >> KDE 1.1.2. All from monday's ports tree.
> >>Well, I think I can't say I am running this system, for I am getting
> >>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 01:28:34AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> One thing to keep in mind is that on Sept 8, 2000 the patent for RSA
> expires and this whole mess goes away. Or at least devolves into the
> usual crypto export mess rather than the crypto export plus rsa patent
> law plus rsaref lic
running 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #10: Wed Mar 1 10:25:09 PST 2000 doing
a make world with a cvsup of today I get:
sys/mount.h -> sys/mount.ph
sys/msg.h -> sys/msg.ph
sys/msgbuf.h -> sys/msgbuf.ph
sys/mtio.h -> sys/mtio.ph
sys/namei.h -> sys/namei.ph
sys/param.h ->
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Joseph T. Lee wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 01:28:34AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > One thing to keep in mind is that on Sept 8, 2000 the patent for RSA
> > expires and this whole mess goes away. Or at least devolves into the
> > usual crypto export mess rather than the c
On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 03:23:17PM +1100, Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The dump fills up precisely the entire 'b' partition. Since the
> > partition begins at offset 0, the dump overwrites the label at sector
> > offset 1 and any bootbl
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sean-Paul Rees writes:
: I have a FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT (cvsup'ed as of tonight) machine. It has a USB
: controller (PIIX3) and an ethernet controller sharing irq 10. I'm not
: much in the way of a hardware expert, so I'm wondering if this is safe or
: if I should rero
On 4 Mar 2000 02:01:03 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.current you wrote:
>William Woods wrote:
>>
>> Running 4.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT #10: Wed Mar 1 10:25:09 PST 2000 on a
>> IBM thinkpad 600E, 128 megs. while doing a make world of todays CVSUP I get
>> this:
>
> What command line
Can someone tell me the exact date that 4.x was split from 3.x? I couldn't
seem to pin it down based on the CVS repository.
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Hi all, I have been working with FreeBSD 4.0-current lately and I have
found a strange thing or two. Here is the really big one that is stopping
me from performing my evil experiments }-D
When I mount a pass-through based file system (null and union both exhibit
this behavior) more than one level
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kris Kennaway
writes:
: Can someone tell me the exact date that 4.x was split from 3.x? I couldn't
: seem to pin it down based on the CVS repository.
Based on sys/i386/conf/files.i386:
1/20/99 to 2/10/99
Based on sys/conf/files:
1/17/99 to 1/21/99
On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> Based on sys/i386/conf/files.i386:
> 1/20/99 to 2/10/99
> Based on sys/conf/files:
> 1/17/99 to 1/21/99
>
> So I'd say it was somewhere between 1/20/99 and 1/21/99. Is that
> close enough for you to "exact"? The branching proccess takes a
>
A missing (not implemented) linux ioctl is breaking VMWare 2.0 -
> linux: 'ioctl' fd=13, cmd=1260 ('^R',96) not implemented
After rummaging around in the 2.3 kernel, I found the following in
`linux/include/linux/fs.h':
/* the read-only stuff doesn't really belong here, but any other place is
Compiling Mozilla with make -j 2 got -current to lock up, twice in
succession. I'm running a fairly recent snapshot (a week or two old)
on a Dual celeron box (BP6) with UDMA66 enabled.
The kernel had DDB enabled. I was running X, but I didn't see any
signs of the kernel attempting to get into the
22 matches
Mail list logo
