Re: Make World Broken?

1999-09-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999 23:52:54 MST, Thomas Dean wrote: > cvsup this evening. make world failed. /usr/src/crypto does not exist. Nope, no problem (well, apart from a few momentarily pending repo-copies which are resolved now). A lot of stuff moved from secure to crypto, so mebbe check which col

CCD update committed

1999-09-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
I've made a bunch of fixes and enhancements to CCD. I do not believe I've messed anything up but CCD is rather messy so I'm doing a little head's up anyway. * CCD panic when underlying storage has a sector size larger then 1K fixed. * CCD lockup when dd'ing from the ra

gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread The Hermit Hacker
just curious, but what is the max setting that can be used to compile the kernel? looking through the man page, I can do something like: -O3 -march=pentium and, if I'm reading the man page right: -mcpu=cpu type Assume the defaults for the machine type CPU TYPE

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:00:50 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > just curious, but what is the max setting that can be used to compile the > kernel? -O Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:00:50 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > just curious, but what is the max setting that can be used to compile the > > kernel? > > -O well, I just did -O3 -mpentium, and it both compiled cleanly, and appears to be runn

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:23:09 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > well, I just did -O3 -mpentium, and it both compiled cleanly, and appears > to be running okay, so is -O the max that makes a difference, or...? Or... Try build world with that kernel running. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe:

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread bsd
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > just curious, but what is the max setting that can be used to compile the > kernel? Works rather nicely here with -O6 -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -pipe -s -fexpensive-optimizations -ffast-math LLaP bero To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 23 Sep, Sheldon Hearn wrote: >> well, I just did -O3 -mpentium, and it both compiled cleanly, and appears >> to be running okay, so is -O the max that makes a difference, or...? > > Or... > > Try build world with that kernel running. :-) Just to let you know: -Os works for me (since egcs hi

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 13:24:50 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > well, I just did -O3 -mpentium, and it both compiled cleanly, and appears > > Try build world with that kernel running. :-) I should have mentioned that I'm speaking from fairly stale experience. I got bitten by this last year and h

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:23:09 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > well, I just did -O3 -mpentium, and it both compiled cleanly, and appears > > to be running okay, so is -O the max that makes a difference, or...? > > Or... > > Try build world

Re: bounced mail

1999-09-23 Thread Mark Murray
> The message is: > > <<< 550 service unavailable; [207.93.148.150] blocked using \ > dul.maps.vix.com DUL == "Dial-up list", and it is a listing of IP addresses that is designed to stop "direct injection" spam. If you use your ISP's mailer as a "smarthost", you will avoid this problem. Thos

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Luke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> > well, I just did -O3 -mpentium, and it both compiled cleanly, and >> > appears >> >> Try build world with that kernel running. :-) > > I should have mentioned that I'm speaking from fairly stale experience. > I got bitten by this last year and

Experimental ACPI driver.

1999-09-23 Thread takawata
Hi, We wrote experimental ACPI driver for 4.0-CURRENT. Now it can 1. Detect signature in so-called BIOS area. 2. Map ACPI reclaim memory and ACPI NVS memory. 3. Detect tables in ACPI memory areas (RSDT FACS DSDT FACP). 4. Catch Powerbutton event and report by dmesg. 5. use character device (tempo

Problem with Compaq SMART-2SL array controller

1999-09-23 Thread freebsd
After doing a cvsup yesterday evening i can't seem to boot on my raid cotroller using the same kernel config. Is -current probing hardware i a different way now or ?? Is there anyone with an answer to this ?? Kernel Config: #Compaq SMART Array 2-SL Controller controller ida0 device

ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread John W. DeBoskey
Hi, I'm current as of 11:30am EST. If a fix has been made for the following I probably won't see it until the cvsup servers run their hourly updates... didn't know if you'd seen this or not. Thanks, John cc -nostdinc -O -pipe -DKERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prot

Re: Problem with Compaq SMART-2SL array controller

1999-09-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I don't know who is maintaining the id driver, but it looks to me like it isn't able to co-exist with the wd driver (because it "steals" the wd drivers cdevsw entry) Poul-Henning In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] w rites: >After doing a cvsup yesterday evening i can't seem to bo

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
[Insert semi-nasty message about how people should really be testing their changes before they commit, how it is a blatant disregard for basic human rigths not to do so etc etc etc] Poul-Henning In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "John W. DeBoskey" writ es: >Hi, > > I'm current as of 11:30am E

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Sep 23), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > just curious, but what is the max setting that can be used to > > compile the kernel? > > Works rather nicely here with > > -O6 -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -pipe -s -fexpensive-optimizati

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :[Insert semi-nasty message about how people should really be testing :their changes before they commit, how it is a blatant disregard for :basic human rigths not to do so etc etc etc] : :Poul-Henning I just forgot to commit a header file. Sorry about that. I test all of my code, unl

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Dillon writes: >: >:[Insert semi-nasty message about how people should really be testing >:their changes before they commit, how it is a blatant disregard for >:basic human rigths not to do so etc etc etc] >: >:Poul-Henning > >I just forgot to commit a

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > Insert nasty message about how people shouldn't post idiotic comments. Totally uncalled-for in our mailing-lists. (And before you hit that `R' key: it doesn't matter how much you think you were provoked.) -GAWEollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Ben Rosengart
Mutual respect is the glue that holds FreeBSD together, IMHO. As such, it should not be discarded lightly. -- Ben Rosengart UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group StarMedia Network, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the messag

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Amancio Hasty
Stay nice 8) Never give the opposition an opportunity to get the best of you for most likely they will fully exploit your weakness . After all isn't that was opposition is all about? -- Amancio Hasty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubsc

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Mutual respect is the glue that holds FreeBSD together, IMHO. As such, :it should not be discarded lightly. : :-- : Ben Rosengart Mutual respect doesn't exist when one of the parties refuses to listen to *anyone's* advise, ever. I am getting wholely sick and tired of having to clea

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :Hi, : : I'm current as of 11:30am EST. If a fix has been made for the :following I probably won't see it until the cvsup servers run :their hourly updates... didn't know if you'd seen this or :not. : :Thanks, :John The missing header file changes have been committed. They should show

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Foxfair Hu
phk, dillon, other FreeBSD folks, We are all in a Open Source project named "Free"BSD. So could we agree with all, play it totally "free" and "open" ? Not just sharing your own knowledge freely, but also sitting you mind with thousands of others' open. It is more helpful to t

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
:On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:00:50 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: : :> just curious, but what is the max setting that can be used to compile the :> kernel? : :-O : :Ciao, :Sheldon. I've found -Os to produce quite excellent code. It's an option specific to the new EGCS compiler (known as 'GCC

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 09:19:18AM -0700, Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > : > :[Insert semi-nasty message about how people should really be testing > :their changes before they commit, how it is a blatant disregard for > :basic human rigths not to do so etc etc etc] > : > :Poul-Henn

Re: Problem with Compaq SMART-2SL array controller

1999-09-23 Thread Jonathan Lemon
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >After doing a cvsup yesterday evening i can't seem to boot on my >raid cotroller using the same kernel config. > >Is -current probing hardware i a different way now or ?? It appears so. The IDA driver needs to stomp on the WD driver's vectors in order t

Re: Make World Broken?

1999-09-23 Thread Doug
Thomas Dean wrote: > > cvsup this evening. make world failed. /usr/src/crypto does not exist. I got bitten by this too. The solution is to add the crypto distribution to your cvsup file. I'm not sure how I feel about this though. I kind of liked having DES in its own dist since I don't

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread John W. DeBoskey
Many thanks... personal opinions aside, I appreciate the work that ALL of you do. Again, many thanks, John > > : > :Hi, > : > : I'm current as of 11:30am EST. If a fix has been made for the > :following I probably won't see it until the cvsup servers run > :their hourly updates... didn't k

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread bsd
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Dan Nelson wrote: > > Works rather nicely here with > > > > -O6 -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -pipe -s -fexpensive-optimizations > > -ffast-math > > -O6 is too much; -O3 is the highest level tested for by egcs. But specifying something too high (-O99) doesn't hurt - I'm u

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> :> -O6 is too much; -O3 is the highest level tested for by egcs. : :But specifying something too high (-O99) doesn't hurt - I'm using -O6 for :gcc 2.95.1 (which, by the way, compiles almost everything in 3.3-RELEASE :and 4.0-CURRENT, the only thing still troubling me with it is the kernel). :

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 1999 08:23:09 -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > well, I just did -O3 -mpentium, and it both compiled cleanly, and appears > > to be running okay, so is -O the max that makes a difference, or...? > > Or... > > Try build world with t

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Nate Williams
> :[Insert semi-nasty message about how people should really be testing > :their changes before they commit, how it is a blatant disregard for > :basic human rigths not to do so etc etc etc] > ... > Insert nasty message about how people shouldn't post idiotic comments. Play nice boys! Reme

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> I just forgot to commit a header file. Sorry about that. I test all > of my code, unlike you Poul. > > Insert nasty message about how people shouldn't post idiotic comments. Ummm. I don't see this going in positive directions at all and I'd appreciate it highly if everyone invol

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
> Mutual respect doesn't exist when one of the parties refuses to listen > to *anyone's* advise, ever. > > I am getting wholely sick and tired of having to clean up after Poul's > commit bugs. I've spent at least a hundred hours and probably more in > the last month fixing th

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Darryl Okahata
In the interests of peace and harmony (;-), I'd like to submit the attached perl script, which lists the status of cvs-controlled files. In particular, it's very useful for determining which files have been modified but not committed, like: i386/linux/linux_file.c

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread bsd
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: >I tend not to like the higher optimization levels because they cause >the compiler to attempt to turn static functions into inlines and, >in my opinion, it doesn't do a very good job of selecting which functions >to convert. The result

Re: bounced mail

1999-09-23 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
> > I am seeing bounced mail from -current since this evening. > > The message is: > > <<< 550 service unavailable; [207.93.148.150] blocked using \ > dul.maps.vix.com > > I tried disconnecting from my ISP and redialing to change the IP. Same > results. > > My ISP, netcom (now mindspring) h

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Sep 23), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > I tend not to like the higher optimization levels because they > > cause the compiler to attempt to turn static functions into inlines > > and, in my opinion, it doesn't do a very good job of sel

pcl-cvs (was Re: ccd build failure)

1999-09-23 Thread Jacques Vidrine
Thanks for the script! I thought I'd point out pcl-cvs for emacs, which can be found at src/contrib/cvs/tools/pcl-cvs or it can be easily installed using XEmacs 21's package management. Jacques Vidrine / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 23 September 1999 at 11:46, Darryl Okahata <[EMAIL

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Matthew Dillon writes: : Mutual respect doesn't exist when one of the parties refuses to listen : to *anyone's* advise, ever. I think that this overstates things too much. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-cur

Re: Problem with Compaq SMART-2SL array controller

1999-09-23 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jonathan Lemon writes: : It appears so. The IDA driver needs to stomp on the WD driver's : vectors in order to boot off of the RAID controller. It seems that : something changed so that wd is getting probed after the ida driver : now, and removing the vectors. Is

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Anton Berezin
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 11:46:38AM -0700, Darryl Okahata wrote: > I'd like to submit the attached perl script, which lists the status of > cvs-controlled files. In particular, it's very useful for determining > which files have been modified but not committed With the following patch this scrip

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Oliver Fromme
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in list.freebsd-current: > On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > just curious, but what is the max setting that can be used to compile the > > kernel? > > Works rather nicely here with > > -O6 -mpentiumpro -march=pentiumpro -pipe -s -fexpensive-optimiza

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Oliver Fromme
Darryl Okahata wrote in list.freebsd-current: > In the interests of peace and harmony (;-), I'd like to submit the > attached perl script, which lists the status of cvs-controlled files. > In particular, it's very useful for determining which files have been > modified but not committed,

Re: Problem with Compaq SMART-2SL array controller

1999-09-23 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Sep 09, 1999 at 01:26:35PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jonathan Lemon writes: > : It appears so. The IDA driver needs to stomp on the WD driver's > : vectors in order to boot off of the RAID controller. It seems that > : something changed so that wd is getting p

Re: Problem with Compaq SMART-2SL array controller

1999-09-23 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jonathan Lemon writes: : Yes. The IDA driver will be happy with it's own device nodes : (/dev/ida), but last time I checked, the boot/loader would : only understand root devices of wd() or da(). I understand that : Soren's ad() driver has the same problem. T

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Mark Murray
> I am getting wholely sick and tired of having to clean up after Poul's > commit bugs. I've spent at least a hundred hours and probably more in > the last month fixing things that he's broken, like BOOTP and VN. I > would much rather spend my time on other more interesting thing

Re: Problem with Compaq SMART-2SL array controller

1999-09-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes: >phk's fla driver mount / correctly when it is the boot device. >However, the boot loader does have some interesting limitations in >this area last time I checked. Likely it was due to using the -stable >version for most of my testing. I actua

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Wilko Bulte
As Jordan K. Hubbard wrote ... > > I just forgot to commit a header file. Sorry about that. I test all > > of my code, unlike you Poul. > > > > Insert nasty message about how people shouldn't post idiotic comments. > > Ummm. I don't see this going in positive directions at all and

On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-23 Thread Don Croyle
Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [hub.freebsd.org now blocking IP adresses on the DUL] > If you use your ISP's mailer as a "smarthost", you will avoid this > problem. > > Thos of us in the anti-spam community think thsat this is a Good > Thing. That's one way to cut down on support mail

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Darryl Okahata
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Uhm... Maybe I misunderstand what your 100-line perl script > does, but I use the following 3-line shell script instead: > >#!/bin/sh - >cvs status | grep '^File:' | grep -v 'Status: Up-to-date$' >true This works (and is faster), but

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-23 Thread Jonathan M. Bresler
Don, excellent idea. i have expanded upon it and added it to freebsd.mc. jmb To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 02:51:15PM -0700, a little birdie told me that Darryl Okahata remarked > Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Uhm... Maybe I misunderstand what your 100-line perl script > > does, but I use the following 3-line shell script instead: > > > >#!/bin/sh - > >

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Darryl Okahata
"Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK: > #!/bin/sh > (cvs status | grep '^File:' | grep -v 'Status: Up-to-date$') 2> /dev/null This doesn't give path information -- it's worse than before, in that the (verbose) path information is thrown away. -- Darryl Okahata

Re: ccd build failure

1999-09-23 Thread Dmitrij Tejblum
"Matthew D. Fuller" wrote: > OK: > #!/bin/sh > (cvs status | grep '^File:' | grep -v 'Status: Up-to-date$') 2> /dev/null Excuse me, I apparently completely missed the idea, but what is wrong with cvs -qn up ? Dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-cu

freebsd-uthread.c

1999-09-23 Thread Kip Macy
In three places in your code you do the following or something similar: ptr = (CORE_ADDR) cached_pthread.nxt; struct pthread has no member nxt in either -current or -stable and your patch did not add it to pthread_private.h What did you mean for this to be? Thanks.

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-23 Thread Joe Abley
Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [hub.freebsd.org now blocking IP adresses on the DUL] > > If you use your ISP's mailer as a "smarthost", you will avoid this > problem. > > Thos of us in the anti-spam community think thsat this is a Good > Thing. One of us, at least, evidently. How

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-23 Thread Brad Knowles
At 4:28 PM +1200 1999/9/24, Joe Abley wrote: > How much mail does the use of the MAPS DUL reject? I don't know about the stats from hub.freebsd.org, but from my experience it rejects a relatively small amount. > How much of that do you think is worth rejecting? Again, from

Automating filesystem check at boot time

1999-09-23 Thread John Saunders
I administer a number of remote FreeBSD boxes and starting with 3.x they have been unreliable at rebooting. We all know FreeBSD wants to keep running forever, however it seems to be at the expense of reboot stability. I have found the following problems occuring. 1) After a power failure the fil

Re: Automating filesystem check at boot time

1999-09-23 Thread Rodney W. Grimes
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > I administer a number of remote FreeBSD boxes and starting with 3.x > they have been unreliable at rebooting. We all know FreeBSD wants to > keep running forever, however it seems to be at the expense of > reboot stability. I have found the

Re: Problem with Compaq SMART-2SL array controller

1999-09-23 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > For now, you could remove the IDE devices from the config file, > until this gets fixed. Ideally, the boot blocks/loader should be > taught to boot from something other than wd() or da(). Alas, the loader uses BIOS to read the disk. Anything the BIOS can read, so can t

Re: gcc optimizer in -current system ...

1999-09-23 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But specifying something too high (-O99) doesn't hurt - I'm using -O6 for > gcc 2.95.1 (which, by the way, compiles almost everything in 3.3-RELEASE > and 4.0-CURRENT, the only thing still troubling me with it is the kernel). The point is that it _does_ hurt. Anythin

Re: On hub.freebsd.org refusing to talk to dialups

1999-09-23 Thread Mark Murray
> How much mail does the use of the MAPS DUL reject? Virtually none. The idea is that dial-up users use their own ISP's smarthosts, in which case the ISP can nail them if they are spammers, and I don't get their spam if they go for the "direct-to-MX" or "direct injection" spamming method. Some