Tomoaki NISHIYAMA wrote:
>
> From: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa
> y-nakaga> > You bought a computer with the super-ultra-new Microsoft (tm)
> y-nakaga> > Microsoft Bus (tm), for which you bought the latest and greatest
> y-nakaga> > device X.
> y-nakaga>
> y-nakaga> It is extremely vulgar joke. I doubt you
Hi,
CLEAR is operating a pretty full mirror of ftp.freebsd.org:/pub/FreeBSD/
at ftp.clear.net.nz:/pub/FreeBSD/.
Dan Langille has kindly made ftp.nz.freebsd.org a CNAME to ftp.clear.net.nz
to make this easier to find.
Just thought I'd mention it -- I haven't done a clean install for a long
time,
On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Bob Fayne wrote:
> At 05:40 PM 4/27/99, you wrote:
> >I am looking for a firewall/VPN solution that will allow our company
> >personnel to connect to the corporate network using there Win95 laptops and
> >a Dynamic IP address from there ISP, when they are out traveling or wo
In message , Leif Nel
and writes:
>It won't compile under current.
>freebsd/skip_es.c breaks at
>
> if (suser(p->p_ucred, &p->p_acflag )) {
>
>This won't compile, because suser only has one parameter.
>
>Trying blindly to change it to:
>
> if (suser(p->p_ucred)) {
Better yet, read th
>Could you please consider the following patch to
> /usr/src/release/Makefile? It may not be entirely correct,
> but it allows a 'cd /usr/src/release && make release' to
> run to completion. In the kernel makefile, 'kernel'
> is not a target, ${KERNEL} is, and ${KERNEL} has the value
> 'GENERI
Well, this is just a quick note to anyone more knowledgable than me.
screen 3.7.6 panics a current kernel.
--
[gjvc] "We're not laughing at you; we're laughing with you."
"But I'm not laughing."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Andrew Atrens wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 May 1999, Rick Whitesel wrote:
>
> > I just wanted to say that I really appreciate the work you have/are
> > doing. The disk drive performance under IDE is very important for the
> > practical use of FreeBSD.
> >
> > Thank you!
>
>
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Tomoaki NISHIYAMA wrote:
> >
> > From: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa
> > y-nakaga> > You bought a computer with the super-ultra-new Microsoft (tm)
> > y-nakaga> > Microsoft Bus (tm), for which you bought the latest and greatest
> > y-nakaga> > device X.
> > y-
It seems Brian Feldman wrote:
> On Sat, 15 May 1999, Andrew Atrens wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, 14 May 1999, Rick Whitesel wrote:
> >
> > > I just wanted to say that I really appreciate the work you have/are
> > > doing. The disk drive performance under IDE is very important for the
> > > practi
It seems Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, this sounds stange, I have a noard here with the Alladin on it on
> > which I did the support for the ata driver, it works just fine for me
> > at least...
> >
> Actually, I am having the same sort of problem.. With all the flags set
> properly in
As Doug Rabson wrote ...
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Yeah. That must be why my 164lx won't netboot.
> >
> > Could well be. My Aspen Alpine refused to with a DE500. A DE435 (10mbit
> > only) worked just dandy.
>
> That reminds me. Does your Alpine still work after the
> On Thu, 13 May 1999 10:41:23 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson said:
> As I suspected, a massive flamewar has happened while I've been away. I
> don't think I have anything to add to what has been said (and I certainly
> don't want to continue a flamewar).
> Can people please just drop the
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> As Doug Rabson wrote ...
> > On Mon, 10 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Yeah. That must be why my 164lx won't netboot.
> > >
> > > Could well be. My Aspen Alpine refused to with a DE500. A DE435 (10mbit
> > > only) worked just dandy.
>
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Noriyuki Soda wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 May 1999 10:41:23 +0100 (BST),
> Doug Rabson said:
>
> > As I suspected, a massive flamewar has happened while I've been away. I
> > don't think I have anything to add to what has been said (and I certainly
> > don't want to cont
> Well, this is just a quick note to anyone more knowledgable than me.
>
> screen 3.7.6 panics a current kernel.
>
>
> --
> [gjvc] "We're not laughing at you; we're laughing with you."
> "But I'm not laughing."
>
I committed a fix yesterday afternoon, c
I sent in a patch to PR 10570 a couple days ago, after quite a bit of
testing (and catching up on email while changing countries..)
So, if someone wants to commit the patch..
Thanks (and it took too long, i know..)
adrian
--
Adrian Chadd
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
w
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 11:55:42AM +, George Cox wrote:
# Well, this is just a quick note to anyone more knowledgable than me.
#
# screen 3.7.6 panics a current kernel.
to add a little bit: when the kernel has SMP enabled. at least here,
checked 3 machines.
--
-mishania
To Unsubscribe:
> On Sat, 15 May 1999 15:58:01 +0100 (BST),
Doug Rabson said:
> I would like to postpone until after Usenix. I'm sure that we will be able
> to sort out any technical misunderstandings there which will make it
> possible to have a reasonable public discussion.
OK, I'll postpone, then
Josef Karthauser wrote:
> Couldn't it read:
> tcp_extensions="NO" # Switch RFC1323 extensions on?
How about:
tcp_extensions="NO" # Set to Yes to turn on RFC1323 extensions
That would match existing style and be a lot more clear. I can submit a PR
if anyone thinks that's really n
This morning, I did an installworld and booted a new -current
world and -current kernel (Sources from morning of Fri May 14th).
I got the following messages during the SCSI probe:
Waiting 10 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
aha0: ahafetchtransinfo - Inquire Setup Info Failed
(probe20:aha0:
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Bret A. Ford wrote:
>Waiting 10 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
>aha0: ahafetchtransinfo - Inquire Setup Info Failed
>(probe20:aha0:0:5:0): CCB 0xc553b450 - timed out
>(probe20:aha0:0:5:0): CCB 0xc553b450 - timed out
>aha0: No longer in timeout
I'm seeing the same thing, b
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
> At 3:51 PM +0700 5/12/99, Ustimenko Semen wrote:
> > Are we going to get this license? I am interested in NTFS
> > source code a lot...
>
> I would be very careful about getting an NT source license if
> your intention is to write NTFS support for
Fyi,
With today's -current, while trying to restore some files from a recent (about
3 days ago) dump, I'm seeing:
/kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:3:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than suplied buffer
Oh, and mounting
swap /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,nodev,-s=32768 0 0
panics the system with a do
> Fyi,
>
> With today's -current, while trying to restore some files from a recent (about
> 3 days ago) dump, I'm seeing:
>
> /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:3:0): 65536-byte tape record bigger than suplied buffer
This is because a bug was fixed that actually now correctly reports the
problem.
You
Dear people,
I get no sound anymore using the system built on Friday.
As I saw same earlier reports here about problems with sound
that were reported to be fixed, mine might be related to the card
being a PCI one - ES1370 based genuine Ensoniq Audio PCI.
Below follow dmesg output and kernel con
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 12:50:10PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> You've made this tape with a 64KB record. You need to give an argument to
> recover that understands this.
Ahh ``-b 64'', I recall the discussion with Wilko Bulte a few days ago now.
Sorry for the false alert :-/
> > panics the syst
> On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 12:50:10PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > You've made this tape with a 64KB record. You need to give an argument to
> > recover that understands this.
>
> Ahh ``-b 64'', I recall the discussion with Wilko Bulte a few days ago now.
> Sorry for the false alert :-/
Let me
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 01:13:27PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> Let me know how it goes...
Quite well, thank you :)
jos:/home/jos# restore -ivb 64
Verify tape and initialize maps
Dump date: Wed May 12 23:36:39 1999
Dumped from: the epoch
Level 0 dump of / on jos.bugworks.com:/dev/da2s1a
Label:
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Mikhail A. Sokolov wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 11:55:42AM +, George Cox wrote:
> # Well, this is just a quick note to anyone more knowledgable than me.
> #
> # screen 3.7.6 panics a current kernel.
>
> to add a little bit: when the kernel has SMP enabled. at least h
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Narvi wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 May 1999, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
>
> > At 3:51 PM +0700 5/12/99, Ustimenko Semen wrote:
> > > Are we going to get this license? I am interested in NTFS
> > > source code a lot...
> >
> > I would be very careful about getting an NT source licens
On Fri, 14 May 1999 19:34:43 CDT, Anthony Kimball wrote:
>
>If anyone has applied reasonable stress to a recent MP kernel,
>preferrably with X, VESA, VM86, and found it stable, do please report
>on your last cvs update time: I, for one, would very much like to
>isolate a fairly stable post-newbus w
Make buildworld fails here with:
===>/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl
find: build: No such file or directory
find: build: No such file or directory
mkdir: lib/auto: File exists
*** Error code 1
Stop.
Thordur Ivarsson
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
> >It won't compile under current.
> >freebsd/skip_es.c breaks at
> >
> > if (suser(p->p_ucred, &p->p_acflag )) {
> >
> >This won't compile, because suser only has one parameter.
> >
> >Trying blindly to change it to:
> >
> > if (suser(p->p_ucred)) {
>
> Better y
> It would probably be very unwise for the project to get get the licence.
>
> However, considering that we support loadable filesystem modules, somebody
> adventurous enough can get the licence and write a (separate distributed,
> possibly even only as binary) module.
>
> Downloading a kld mod
> I replied to this in private, but, for the record, it was not a
> joke.
Ok, I see your say. I feel inadequate metaphor and provocation
form, so that message seemed vulgar joke.
New-bus's goal is meaningful, but not only that one. Also
newconfig is same. Difference between these is realization w
>
>
> I had two systems reboot at nearly the same time. (30 seconds apart), and
> are completely unrelated.
These both look like stack damage, actually.
> One system was running 2.2.8, and my core file presents me with this:
>
> su-2.02# gdb -k
> GDB is free software and you are welcome to dis
> > One system was running 2.2.8, and my core file presents me with this:
...
> Just out of curiosity, are either of these systems running with NCR
> controllers?
In case you're fishing, I'm running 4 NCR equipped boxes (510 and 575)
with FreeBSD 2.2.8-stable right now and have seen *NO* problems
Garance A Drosehn wrote:
>
> At 3:51 PM +0700 5/12/99, Ustimenko Semen wrote:
> > Are we going to get this license? I am interested in NTFS
> > source code a lot...
>
> I would be very careful about getting an NT source license if
> your intention is to write NTFS support for some other operating
38 matches
Mail list logo
