On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Vincent Poy wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
>
> > From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > >
> > According to the inetd man page:
> >
> >TCP Wrappers
> > When given the -w option, inetd will wrap all services specified as
>
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
> From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Any ideas?
> >
> >
> According to the inetd man page:
>
>TCP Wrappers
> When given the -w option, inetd will wrap all services specified as
> ``stream nowait'' or ``dgram'' except for ``internal''
From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Any ideas?
>
>
According to the inetd man page:
TCP Wrappers
When given the -w option, inetd will wrap all services specified as
``stream nowait'' or ``dgram'' except for ``internal'' services. If
the
-W option is given, such ``internal'
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Scot W. Hetzel wrote:
> From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > You only enabled 1/3 of the source to use PROCESS_OPTIONS, you also need
> to
> > add the option to libwrap (lib/libwrap) and tcpdchk
> (src/usr.sbin/tcpdchk).
> >
> Small correction, the lib/libwrap/Makefil
From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You only enabled 1/3 of the source to use PROCESS_OPTIONS, you also need
to
> add the option to libwrap (lib/libwrap) and tcpdchk
(src/usr.sbin/tcpdchk).
>
Small correction, the lib/libwrap/Makefile is setting PROCESS_OPTIONS in
it's CFLAGS. The only ot
From: "Vincent Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In -CURRENT, /usr/src/libexec/tcpd, the Makefile doesn't have
> -DPROCESS_OPTIONS needed which in hosts_access(5) manpage, allows things
> such as banners for the tcp_wrappers to be working.
>
> So in the /usr/src/libexec/tcpd/Makefile, I added
> -DPROCESS
Greetings:
In -CURRENT, /usr/src/libexec/tcpd, the Makefile doesn't have
-DPROCESS_OPTIONS needed which in hosts_access(5) manpage, allows things
such as banners for the tcp_wrappers to be working.
>From hosts_access(5):
An extended version of the access control language is described in
