Re: questions asked in CURRENT, answered in UPDATING

2000-03-27 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:22:42 MST, Warner Losh wrote: > It also tends to self regulate the UPDATING usage. As usage falls, > more messages are likely to appear on the list, to which the see > updating replies happen, which causes usage to rise again. Two good arguments. Idea sumamrily dismiss

Re: questions asked in CURRENT, answered in UPDATING

2000-03-27 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sheldon Hearn writes: : I'd like to propose that everyone confine such answers to private mail. No. I'm going to continue to do it publicly. : 1) Folks who _do_ read UPDATING aren't further inconvenienced by :multiple "see UPDATING" replies. 'd' works well :-

questions asked in CURRENT, answered in UPDATING

2000-03-27 Thread Sheldon Hearn
Hi Warner, I notice you often copy back to the list your "see UPDATING" replies to "current breakage" questions. I'd like to propose that everyone confine such answers to private mail. There are two advantages to doing it that way: 1) Folks who _do_ read UPDATING aren't further inconvenienced