In article <4fe340ff.80...@gmail.com>, demelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
>On 21/06/2012 14:55, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> It returns (size_t)(-1).
>> I don't know how is it correct, but this conforms to C spec.
>Mm, if I understand well, since it is cast to size_t, I think the return
>value will b
On 21/06/2012 14:55, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 21 June 2012 16:38, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
While reading the manpage of mbstowcs I noticed an error in the RETURN
VALUES :
The mbstowcs() function returns the number of wide characters converted,
not counting any terminating null
On 21 June 2012 19:42, David Demelier wrote:
> On 21/06/2012 14:55, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>>
>> On 21 June 2012 16:38, David Demelier wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> While reading the manpage of mbstowcs I noticed an error in the RETURN
>>> VALUES :
>>>
>>> The mbstowcs() function returns the
On 21/06/2012 14:55, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
On 21 June 2012 16:38, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
While reading the manpage of mbstowcs I noticed an error in the RETURN
VALUES :
The mbstowcs() function returns the number of wide characters converted,
not counting any terminating null
On 21 June 2012 16:38, David Demelier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While reading the manpage of mbstowcs I noticed an error in the RETURN
> VALUES :
>
> The mbstowcs() function returns the number of wide characters converted,
> not counting any terminating null wide character, or -1 if an invalid
>
Hello,
While reading the manpage of mbstowcs I noticed an error in the RETURN
VALUES :
The mbstowcs() function returns the number of wide characters
converted,
not counting any terminating null wide character, or -1 if an invalid
multibyte character was encountered.
Since siz
