In article <4fe340ff.80...@gmail.com>, demelier.da...@gmail.com writes: >On 21/06/2012 14:55, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: >> It returns (size_t)(-1). >> I don't know how is it correct, but this conforms to C spec.
>Mm, if I understand well, since it is cast to size_t, I think the return >value will be SIZE_MAX - 1 then, right? No. C does not make any such equivalence. "(size_t)-1" is the one correct spelling of this value (modulo redundant additional parentheses), and that's how the standard writes it. -GAWollman _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
