t;> Thanks Stefan,
>>> I took current /usr/ports/misc/ctm/
>>> & converted Stephen's & my diffs to be automatic ports patches:
>>> http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/misc/ctm/files/
>>> http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixe
On 12/24/18 3:32 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> I see a discrepancy using ctm to extract, between ctm
> built on 9.2-RELEASE & ctm built {from both src or ports} on current.
> Just the 9.2-RELEASE ctm does not create 3 zero size files:
> base/db/rep-cache.db-journal
&g
I wrote:
> I took current /usr/ports/misc/ctm/
> & converted Stephen's & my diffs to be automatic ports patches:
> http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/misc/ctm/files/
> http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/misc/ctm/README.JH
n
> >>
> >> Thanks Stefan,
> >> I took current /usr/ports/misc/ctm/
> >> & converted Stephen's & my diffs to be automatic ports patches:
> >>
> http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/misc/ctm/files/
> >>
> http://b
On 12/21/18 10:03 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> The port Makefile that I have prepared is attached below for reference.
>> Regards, STefan
>
> Thanks Stefan,
> I took current /usr/ports/misc/ctm/
> & converted Stephen's & my diffs to be automatic ports patche
Am 23.12.18 um 02:39 schrieb Montgomery-Smith, Stephen:
> On 12/21/18 10:03 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>>> The port Makefile that I have prepared is attached below for reference.
>>> Regards, STefan
>>
>> Thanks Stefan,
>> I took current /usr/ports/misc/ctm/
> The port Makefile that I have prepared is attached below for reference.
> Regards, STefan
Thanks Stefan,
I took current /usr/ports/misc/ctm/
& converted Stephen's & my diffs to be automatic ports patches:
http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/fixes/freebsd/ports/gen/mi
ng it before we
> have a chance to socialize the removal and give people a chance to cut over.
> None of this requires a new policy. Everybody agrees we should do it. We
> shouldn't let some perceived policy get in the way of just moving forward.
I have created a review for the remov
And more importantly a great thanks for ctm from all of us who depended on
it for ages ;-)
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp
Sent: 22 October 2018 21:59
To: Warner Losh
Cc: Rodney W
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 2:13 PM Rodney W. Grimes <
freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> > A cost(=time)/benefit look on moving ctm from src/ to ports/ :
> > - No tangible architecture benefit (its not like purging an old driver
> > to makes kernel support simpl
> A cost(=time)/benefit look on moving ctm from src/ to ports/ :
> - No tangible architecture benefit (its not like purging an old driver
> to makes kernel support simpler, or avoiding clashing libs etc)
> - FreeBSD would shrink 0.028 % of the size of src/
> cd /pub/F
A cost(=time)/benefit look on moving ctm from src/ to ports/ :
- No tangible architecture benefit (its not like purging an old driver
to makes kernel support simpler, or avoiding clashing libs etc)
- FreeBSD would shrink 0.028 % of the size of src/
cd /pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/src
Stephen:
> > > I have no problem turning ctm into a port. But I would appreciate
> > > advice on whether there is a standard or easy process for
> converting
> > > software from the FreeBSD base to a port. If not, I can muddle my
> way
> > >
On 10/23/18 11:44 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 23.10.18 um 17:27 schrieb Montgomery-Smith, Stephen:
>> I have no problem turning ctm into a port. But I would appreciate
>> advice on whether there is a standard or easy process for converting
>> software from the FreeBSD base
Am 23.10.18 um 19:06 schrieb Warner Losh:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:44 AM Stefan Esser <mailto:s...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
>
> Am 23.10.18 um 17:27 schrieb Montgomery-Smith, Stephen:
> > I have no problem turning ctm into a port. But I would apprec
> Am 23.10.18 um 17:27 schrieb Montgomery-Smith, Stephen:
> > I have no problem turning ctm into a port. But I would appreciate
> > advice on whether there is a standard or easy process for converting
> > software from the FreeBSD base to a port. If not, I can muddle my way
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 10:44 AM Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 23.10.18 um 17:27 schrieb Montgomery-Smith, Stephen:
> > I have no problem turning ctm into a port. But I would appreciate
> > advice on whether there is a standard or easy process for converting
> > software from
Am 23.10.18 um 17:27 schrieb Montgomery-Smith, Stephen:
> I have no problem turning ctm into a port. But I would appreciate
> advice on whether there is a standard or easy process for converting
> software from the FreeBSD base to a port. If not, I can muddle my way
> through it.
I have no problem turning ctm into a port. But I would appreciate
advice on whether there is a standard or easy process for converting
software from the FreeBSD base to a port. If not, I can muddle my way
through it. But give me some time (a few months) to get it done,
because the rest of my
Hi, Reference:
> From: "Rodney W. Grimes"
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> >
> > In message
> >
> > , Warner Losh writes:
> >
> > >> > I think Julian Stac
> "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> > > The ctm(1) client remains in the FreeBSD base system, although
> > > FreeBSD-hosted ctm infrastructure was shut down some time ago. I
> > > suspect it is time to remove it from the base system (perhaps making a
> > &g
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> > The ctm(1) client remains in the FreeBSD base system, although
> > FreeBSD-hosted ctm infrastructure was shut down some time ago. I
> > suspect it is time to remove it from the base system (perhaps making a
> > port).
> >
&
>
> In message
>
> , Warner Losh writes:
>
> >> > I think Julian Stacy is still running CTM generation ?
> >>
> >> Ah, yes, that brought back enough brain cells,
> >> confirmed that is who I saw with ctm usage.
> >
> &g
In message
, Warner Losh writes:
>> > I think Julian Stacy is still running CTM generation ?
>>
>> Ah, yes, that brought back enough brain cells,
>> confirmed that is who I saw with ctm usage.
>
>Do we need it in base? Or can we make it a port?
Abs
gt; mes" writes:
> >
> > >I do not know that other than I do know that I have seen
> > >one data point in the last 14 days of a user who was infact
> > >using ctm though I can not associate a username/email address
> > >with that memory.
> > >
other than I do know that I have seen
> > >one data point in the last 14 days of a user who was infact
> > >using ctm though I can not associate a username/email address
> > >with that memory.
> > >
> > >A search of the last 30 days of @freebsd.org publi
>
> In message <201810221957.w9mjvdxx012...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>, "Rodney W.
> Gri
> mes" writes:
>
> >I do not know that other than I do know that I have seen
> >one data point in the last 14 days of a user who was infact
> >usin
In message <201810221957.w9mjvdxx012...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net>, "Rodney W. Gri
mes" writes:
>I do not know that other than I do know that I have seen
>one data point in the last 14 days of a user who was infact
>using ctm though I can not associate a username
> The ctm(1) client remains in the FreeBSD base system, although
> FreeBSD-hosted ctm infrastructure was shut down some time ago. I
> suspect it is time to remove it from the base system (perhaps making a
> port).
>
> How much use does ctm have these days?
I do not know that ot
The ctm(1) client remains in the FreeBSD base system, although
FreeBSD-hosted ctm infrastructure was shut down some time ago. I
suspect it is time to remove it from the base system (perhaps making a
port).
How much use does ctm have these days
I forwarded Mark's article with changed headers:
as it seems to me ctm-users@ would be more interested/ affected.
From
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Mark Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all
Last time I looked, we had _very_ few CTM users.
Is there any reason that the CTM stuff should not be a port?
M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
present. When I asked Jordan about it after
> his "ftp.freebsd.org is back" announcement, he indicated that
> CTM is one of the still-outstanding problems.
>
> [1] Well, it died last weekend, but hopefully that will be restored
> shortly.
Well, the person to talk
t it after
his "ftp.freebsd.org is back" announcement, he indicated that
CTM is one of the still-outstanding problems.
[1] Well, it died last weekend, but hopefully that will be restored
shortly.
Petre
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
I see that cvs-cur stuff hasn't been generated since the beginning of May -
are there any planes to restart it? It was convenient having a local copy of
the CVS repository on disk.
Stephen
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
"We've heard that a million mon
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:26:34AM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote:
>
> > >unfortunatly my provider
> > >cut me off and I just got some access back, but not for the location
> > >the ctm machine is located at.
> > >
&
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote:
> >unfortunatly my provider
> >cut me off and I just got some access back, but not for the location
> >the ctm machine is located at.
> >
> >At this time I do not know yet when it will have access again.
>
> Surely
> Anyway: If CTM was to ever be given up (it's good to read, that Ulf will
> get his CTM box connected again, soon), then there should be a alternate
> access method, that works through tightly configured firewalls. And CVsup
> via SSL might be a good candidate ...
Hmm. Loo
otection against malicious data sent
over such a connection will have to be provided by the endpoints (and I have
been demanding SSL with client and server certificates for most of the B2B
INTERNET services, at work).
Anyway: If CTM was to ever be given up (it's good to read, that Ulf will
g
On Thursday, 22nd March 2001, Bruce Evans wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Stephen McKay wrote:
>> On the contrary, I prefer CTM over CVSup, even on a fast connection (which
>> I don't currently have). On a slow or intermittent connection, CTM beats
>> CVSup by a large mar
9600baud modems, we recommend
> >> > using CVSup to get src-all and ports-all updated. At the worst case,
> >> > be able to CVSup a ports-all collection within an hour, with heavy
> >> > packet loss and low bandwidth.
> >> >
> >> > i.e. CTM s
On a positive note, both Pachell and Covad agree the localloop for
my new DSL is ready, so I hope to see a covad person with router
in the next few days, which would mean I should be up and running
again soon.
--
Regards, Ulf.
nnections greater than 9600baud modems, we recommend
> >> > using CVSup to get src-all and ports-all updated. At the worst case,
> >> > be able to CVSup a ports-all collection within an hour, with heavy
> >> > packet loss and low bandwidth.
> >> >
> &
> Just an idea:
>
> How about a CVSUP via HTTPS server (just as a means to tunnel CVSUP
> through a HTTPS proxy ...) ?
>
> Most probably a CVSUP daemon bound to port 443 would do (there are
> programs that tunnel arbitrary data through a HTTPS proxy, though
> I admit this is cheating ;-)
You s
ts-all updated. At the worst case,
>> > be able to CVSup a ports-all collection within an hour, with heavy
>> > packet loss and low bandwidth.
>> >
>> > i.e. CTM sucks, don't use it. :)
On the contrary, I prefer CTM over CVSup, even on a fast connection
On 2001-03-19 17:01 -0800, Ulf Zimmermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been hosting the machine which ran ctm, unfortunatly my provider
> cut me off and I just got some access back, but not for the location
> the ctm machine is located at.
Ummm, that's bad ...
I had
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 04:53:33PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 20-Mar-01 Michael C . Wu wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:07:13AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir scribbled:
> >| Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be
> >| any del
On 20-Mar-01 Michael C . Wu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:07:13AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir scribbled:
>| Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be
>| any deltas (either src-cur, or ports-cur) since Mar 12 :-(
>
> For all connections g
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 02:07:13AM +0200, Vladimir Kushnir scribbled:
| Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be
| any deltas (either src-cur, or ports-cur) since Mar 12 :-(
For all connections greater than 9600baud modems, we recommend
using CVSup to get sr
Hello all,
Is there anything wrong with our CTM system now? There doesn't seem to be
any deltas (either src-cur, or ports-cur) since Mar 12 :-(
Regards,
Vladimir
--
===|===
Vladimir Kushnir |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Powered by Fr
On 2001-Feb-07 08:13:31 +0100, Rasa Karapandza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I receive ctm-src current by e-mail, which I retrive using netscape.
>I save message as plain text then I try uudecode and I alvays get no begin
>line I tryed to edit file but I'm not able to get it w
I receive ctm-src current by e-mail, which I retrive using netscape.
I save message as plain text then I try uudecode and I alvays get no begin
line I tryed to edit file but I'm not able to get it work.
Regards,
Rasa
P.S.
I know that this question doesn,t belong here but I did not get a
On Sat, 11 Mar 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The latest CTM delta for -CURRENT on ftp.freebsd.org is 4257 (March
> 6). Because all of the mirrors for CTM are in countries other than the US,
> would there be any differences between the deltas they have and the ones
> that ftp
The latest CTM delta for -CURRENT on ftp.freebsd.org is 4257 (March
6). Because all of the mirrors for CTM are in countries other than the US,
would there be any differences between the deltas they have and the ones
that ftp.freebsd.org should have? (I don't understand this crypto thing
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've got a 4.0-2210-CURRENT snapshot and decided to try CTM.
> > I've
[...]
> > ps works quite right. It seems like kernel an
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've got a 4.0-2210-CURRENT snapshot and decided to try CTM.
> I've
> - read handbook chapter about using CTM
> - subscribed to ctm-cur, ctm-port, ctm-announce
> - downloaded all src-cur.42* del
Hello,
I've got a 4.0-2210-CURRENT snapshot and decided to try CTM.
I've
- read handbook chapter about using CTM
- subscribed to ctm-cur, ctm-port, ctm-announce
- downloaded all src-cur.42* deltas from
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM/src-cur/
- rm -r
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Looking at my CTM logs, I seem to be missing some pieces in the last 3
> cvs-cur postings (cvs-cur 6021, 6022, 6023). I get two pieces
> simultaneously and then nothing until the next part. Is anyone else
> seeing this? Chuck isn&#x
Looking at my CTM logs, I seem to be missing some pieces in the last 3
cvs-cur postings (cvs-cur 6021, 6022, 6023). I get two pieces
simultaneously and then nothing until the next part. Is anyone else
seeing this? Chuck isn't sure if it's anything he's done.
Looking back,
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> The last cvs-cur CTM delta I received was cvs-cur.5961, which arrived
> just over 24 hours ago. Is there a problem with the CTM generation?
Fixed that problem (security thing) found another. Still working on it.
>
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> The last cvs-cur CTM delta I received was cvs-cur.5961, which arrived
> just over 24 hours ago. Is there a problem with the CTM generation?
Right. Login problem. Fixed real quick now.
>
The last cvs-cur CTM delta I received was cvs-cur.5961, which arrived
just over 24 hours ago. Is there a problem with the CTM generation?
Peter
--
Peter Jeremy (VK2PJ)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alcatel Australia Limited
41 Mandible St Phone: +61 2 9690 5019
hello,
I make world and new kernel with ctm source up to src-cur.4115
successfully. However, my system go to panic when I boot it with new
kernel. The error was
=== Error ===
resume IOPL = 0
interrupt mask none <-- SMPXXX
trap number = 12
mp_lock = 0102 cpuid = 1
boot() c
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Jeremy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1999-Nov-03 23:58:00 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> There are no new CTM-deltas on 'ctm.freebsd.org'
>>at least 22 hours.
>
> The last e-mail delta I have is cvs-cur.5804, whi
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There are no new CTM-deltas on 'ctm.freebsd.org'
> at least 22 hours.
>
> Is this known problem ?
I've been waiting 41 hours now for cvs-cur.5804.gz.
Also, ftp.freebsd.org has been hard to reach since freebs
On 1999-Nov-03 23:58:00 +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There are no new CTM-deltas on 'ctm.freebsd.org'
>at least 22 hours.
The last e-mail delta I have is cvs-cur.5804, which arrived here at
0808UTC (about 5 hours before your message). I would have expected to
rec
There are no new CTM-deltas on 'ctm.freebsd.org'
at least 22 hours.
Is this known problem ?
N.Dudorov
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Nickolay N.Dudorov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 12:13:33AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Last CTM delta in
> > > ftp://ctm.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM-international/
> There isn't any "int-cvs-cur", so are you referring to maybe the
> International Crypto Repository run by Mark Murray out of SA?
Yes, he is :-).
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current
> Last CTM delta in
> ftp://ctm.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM-international/int-cvs-cur
> is 'int-cvs-cur.0114.gz' from May 15 1999.
>
> There definitely was commits in International depository
> after 'may 15'.
Send me the address y
On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 12:13:33AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Last CTM delta in
> > ftp://ctm.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM-international/int-cvs-cur
> > is 'int-cvs-cur.0114.gz' from May 15 1
On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Last CTM delta in
> ftp://ctm.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM-international/int-cvs-cur
> is 'int-cvs-cur.0114.gz' from May 15 1999.
There isn't any "int-cvs-cur", so are you referring to maybe the
I
Last CTM delta in
ftp://ctm.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/development/CTM-international/int-cvs-cur
is 'int-cvs-cur.0114.gz' from May 15 1999.
There definitely was commits in International depository
after 'may 15'.
N.Dudorov
To Unsubscribe: send mail
As most of you know by now, ctm is back, but ftp of ctm is temporarily
still broken. If you want something, tell me and I'll stick it in
http://www.freebsd.org/~chuckr. It's short of room there too, so don't
ask for what you don't need.
Thanks, I'll try not to post abo
I'm working on restoring ctm finally (now the disk is working, and the
extra room is terrific!)
I am going to do things manually for a short while, so the interval of
things is going to be unpredictable, but I'd consider it a favor if,
when you get a ctm, you email me directly. Ke
The machine itself is back up. Services are being restored
currently.
The machine has now a 12GB vinum filesystem for /ctm and
should not run out of space so fast again.
--
Regards, Ulf.
-
Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave
According to Jean-Marc Zucconi:
> This one did not arrive in my mailbox. Can someone send it to me? I
> would like to avoid downloading 6Mbytes again.
It seems that it got here right:
-rw--- 1 nobody wheel 73872 May 3 19:10 cvs-cur.5292.gz+017-082
-rw--- 1 nobody wheel 73872 May 3
Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
> >>>>> Stephen McKay writes:
>
> > I also did not receive part 18. Are the individual parts kept anywhere
> > for anonymous ftp access?
>
> I will put it on http://www.freebsd.org/~jmz/part18 in a few minutes.
The ctms are i
> Stephen McKay writes:
> I also did not receive part 18. Are the individual parts kept anywhere
> for anonymous ftp access?
I will put it on http://www.freebsd.org/~jmz/part18 in a few minutes.
Jean-Marc
--
Jean-Marc ZucconiPGP Key: finger j...@freebsd.org
To Uns
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Stephen McKay wrote:
> On Sunday, 2nd May 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 3 May 1999, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
> >
> >> This one did not arrive in my mailbox. Can someone send it to me? I
> >> would like to avoid downloading 6Mbytes again.
> >
> >I'm going to mail it to
On Sunday, 2nd May 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
>On Mon, 3 May 1999, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
>
>> This one did not arrive in my mailbox. Can someone send it to me? I
>> would like to avoid downloading 6Mbytes again.
>
>I'm going to mail it to you separately, but it might not look like it
>came from m
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote:
> This one did not arrive in my mailbox. Can someone send it to me? I
> would like to avoid downloading 6Mbytes again.
I'm going to mail it to you separately, but it might not look like it
came from me.
>
> Jean-Marc
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send m
This one did not arrive in my mailbox. Can someone send it to me? I
would like to avoid downloading 6Mbytes again.
Jean-Marc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> I wrote:
> >I haven't received anything from CTM for cvs-cur since around 0110 PDT
> >yesterday (11th April).
>
> Two minutes after posting this, the CTM backlog started appearing. It
> looks like it Chi.Alameda.net was si
I wrote:
>I haven't received anything from CTM for cvs-cur since around 0110 PDT
>yesterday (11th April).
Two minutes after posting this, the CTM backlog started appearing. It
looks like it Chi.Alameda.net was sitting on it (possibly because
hub.freebsd.org wouldn't accept
I haven't received anything from CTM for cvs-cur since around 0110 PDT
yesterday (11th April). The last thing I got was "ctm-mail
cvs-cur.5226.gz 29/39" and the ftp server shows that up to 5230 (at
least) have been generated.
Is anyone else having problems?
Peter
To Unsubscrib
> I just wanted to make egcs as the default compiler and tried to make world
...
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/egcs/gcc/tm.h:3:
> linux.h: No such file or directory
The fact you are refering to "linux.h" says you've some kind of error...
I never commited linux.h or refere
Hello,
I just wanted to make egcs as the default compiler and tried to make world
wit ctm src-cur.3819. I got the error message. Can anyone help ? Thanks.
Clarence
=== Error ===
In file included from
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/egcs/gcc/config/i386/xm-i386.h
Hello,
I tried to update my system with ctm upto src-cur.3809 and found the following
error. Can anyone help ? thanks.
Clarence
=== Error ===
In file included from
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/libgroff/../../../../contrib/groff/libgroff/new.cc:24:
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/libgroff
> > Look what the egcs import's done to ctm:
..snip..
> Not really :-). It's already been built. The only problem now is mailing
> all that shit out...
Don't forget to trim out the entire copy of textinfo... now that *is*
shit. ;-)
--
-- David(obr...@nuxi.co
Chuck Robey wrote:
> Look what the egcs import's done to ctm:
>
> ctm_dequeue: cvs-cur.5193.gz 1/92 sent
>
> 92 pieces .... well, that knocks ctm out of action for a few days, so
> they won't be complaining about things not building for awhile.
Not really :-). It&#x
In message , Chuck Robey
writes:
>Look what the egcs import's done to ctm:
>
>ctm_dequeue: cvs-cur.5193.gz 1/92 sent
>
>92 pieces .... well, that knocks ctm out of action for a few days, so
>they won't be complaining about things not building for awhile.
We've
Look what the egcs import's done to ctm:
ctm_dequeue: cvs-cur.5193.gz 1/92 sent
92 pieces well, that knocks ctm out of action for a few days, so
they won't be complaining about things not building
Before I start getting screams of rage about ctm being down, it isn't,
but it looks like to world has lost net connectivity to jp.freebsd.org,
so the last src and cvs-cur deltas have mail-bounced.
They'll get thru when connectivity
Matthew Thyer wrote:
> Is something broken or is there a reason for this ?
>
> I normally get src-cur and ports-cur.
This normally happens after a tagging operation; sites take a _helluva_ long
time to catch up and create the diffs.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.
Is something broken or is there a reason for this ?
I normally get src-cur and ports-cur.
/=\
|Work: matthew.th...@dsto.defence.gov.au | Home: thy...@camtech.net.au|
\==
In message Chuck Robey
writes:
: In terms of convenience, cvsup is supreme, but in terms of stability,
: Poul's baby here is the champ, so you have to really consider other
: places of corruption first.
I've had problems when I get > 30 parts at one time on the fast
list...
Warner
To Unsubscri
David Kelly wrote:
> While you can download the missing security stuff, "make release" wants
> to check it out of your local cvs archive. I haven't found a way to put
> it there but I'm a cvs novice.
There is an "international" repository of crypto sources. Lemme know
if you want it.
M
--
Mark
David Kelly wrote:
> > It is available on internat.freebsd.org with CTM...
>
> And its legal for me to "import" it to the US?
No problem. It is illegal to export _from_ the US.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
Ollivier Robert writes:
> According to David Kelly:
> > via CTM while you can with CVSUP. Last time I tried it, this means you
> > can't do a "make release" as Jordan's release Makefiles can't handle a
> > total absense of that stuff (eBones?
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
