2011/2/2 Christopher Olsen :
> Pawel,
>
> I have the latest current source and I patched with your zfs patch from
> zfs_20101213.patch and I am having trouble compiling my kernel.. Is there a
> more current patch to work with the latest –CURRENT source?
An answer from yesterday (working for me t
Pawel,
I have the latest current source and I patched with your zfs patch from
zfs_20101213.patch and I am having trouble compiling my kernel.. Is there a
more current patch to work with the latest –CURRENT source?
-Christopher
___
freebsd-cur
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 07:28:15PM +0100, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
>
> Hello,
>
> Any status update on this ? I regularly check
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/ to see if there's an updated
> version of your patch. 2 m
2010/8/31 Pawel Jakub Dawidek :
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
> teddy bear, so be warned. Don't try it for anything except testing.
>
> This pa
On 09/02/10 17:48, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Now it is even easier to test ne
Hi,
I have just imported your VirtualBox appliance,
created some zpool and wanted to try *dedup* on
FreeBSD, but while I was able to enable *dedup*,
I was not able to check *dedupratio* because
that 'property' is not available, on OpenSolaris
it looked like that:
# zpool get dedupratio pool
NAME
The atomic.h patch does not apply anymore and buildworld fails without it.
At work so can't post results
On Sep 6, 2010 6:09 PM, "Martin Matuska" wrote:
> To avoid user and developer confusion, my patch was just a chain of
> pjd's patch + pjd's atomic.h fix + my v19 boot patch.
>
> I have removed
Wiadomość napisana przez Anonymous w dniu 2010-09-05, o godz. 20:56:
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
>> mad, you can stop here.
> [...]
>> So test whatever you can and report back. Look for regressions,
>
>>
To avoid user and developer confusion, my patch was just a chain of
pjd's patch + pjd's atomic.h fix + my v19 boot patch.
I have removed (= split) the chained patch in my posting and altered my
blog article with updated build instructions that actually just
summarize what has been written on this
Hi everyone,
I have put together a slightly improved patch of Pawel's that compiles
correctly and supports booting from ZFS v19 pools.
You can download the patch here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/zfs/head-zfs-v28-20100831.patch
For users who don't want to compile I have created a mfsBS
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
[...]
> So test whatever you can and report back. Look for regressions,
> strange behaviour,
I wonder why new files tend to have different ACLs than old ones
I got this compile error agains todays current patched with patch -p0 -E <
/usr/src9/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c:
In function 'zfs_ioc_recv':
/usr/src9/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_ioctl.c:3586:
error: too fe
On 09/03/2010 13:02, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:50:44PM +0100, Peter Molnar, BSD wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I would like to try ZFS + VirtualBox but I have got problems:
>>
>>
>> 1) Linux 2.6.32-24-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 20 14:21:58 UTC 2010
>> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> I t
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 07:02:41PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Exporting appliances is a bit broken (if you have more than one disk, it
> will point all disks at the last one from configuration), so I had to
> edit .ovf file manually to fix this. Maybe I messed something up, but I
> was ab
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 04:50:44PM +0100, Peter Molnar, BSD wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to try ZFS + VirtualBox but I have got problems:
>
>
> 1) Linux 2.6.32-24-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 20 14:21:58 UTC 2010
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> I tried import that file in my VirtualBox but I have got
On 09/03/2010 11:50, Peter Molnar, BSD wrote:
> Requires 32-bit libraries installed under /usr/lib32.
> Do: cd /usr/src; make build32 install32; ldconfig -v -m -R /usr/lib32
Did you happen to see the above ?
--
jhell,v
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
On 03/09/10 16:50, Peter Molnar, BSD wrote:
On 02/09/10 22:48, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.pat
On 02/09/10 22:48, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Now it is even easier t
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 23:57, jhell wrote:
> On 09/02/2010 04:55, Rob Farmer wrote:
>>
>> I tried applying the patch to r212087 to rule out recent changes to
>> dtrace, but it made no difference. I used patch -E -p0 < patch.
>>
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> I see that in your build error are a bunch of things t
On 09/02/2010 04:55, Rob Farmer wrote:
>
> I tried applying the patch to r212087 to rule out recent changes to
> dtrace, but it made no difference. I used patch -E -p0 < patch.
>
Hi Rob,
I see that in your build error are a bunch of things to do with atomic.h
and I recalled a patch from pjd@ on
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[...]
> Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Now it is even easier to test new ZFS! :)
Here you can find VirtualBox Applia
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>
> Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
>
buildworld on i386 (yes I know ZFS isn't ideal there):
===> cddl/lib/libdtrace (all)
cc
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 01:55:51AM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> >
> > Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
> >
>
> buildworld o
On 09/01/2010 10:28, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2010 16:59:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
>> mad, you can stop here.
>>
>> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2010/09/01 07:28, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 August 2010 16:59:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
>> mad, you can stop here.
>>
>> The patchset is very expe
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:59:15PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Ok, now that I know you read everything carefully, here is the patch:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs_20100831.patch.bz2
Important note. Please patch with the following command:
# patch -E -p0 < z
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/31/2010 17:59, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
> teddy bear, so
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 16:59:15 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
> teddy bear, so be warned. Don't try it for anyt
Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes:
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
[...]
> So test whatever you can and report back. Look for regressions, strange
> behaviour, missing features, deadlocks, livelocks, preformance
> degradation, etc.
[...]
Cool, but i may try this on a VM and maybe try this on a expermential
production system after I test it on VM since a real system may help
the progress of the new ZFS sinc
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Zhu Han wrote:
> That's cool. Thank you for your work on it.
>
> best regards,
> hanzhu
>
>
That's cool. Thank you for your work on it.
best regards,
hanzhu
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:59 AM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cooki
Infiniband is currently being worked on, sponsored by Panasas, Isilon
and someone else. It's coming along pretty well.
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/ZFS-as-a-Linux-kernel-module-1069056.html
Too bad FreeBSD still lacks Infiniband support. Currently we use ZFS
on FreeBSD and Infin
Pawel,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
mad, you can stop here.
The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
teddy bear, so be warned. Don't try it for anything except testing.
Thank you very much - now
This is awesome. Thank you!
-J
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
>
> The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
> teddy bear, so be
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
> mad, you can stop here.
Woohoo! Thanks for all your hard work on this!
Matt
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.or
Hello.
I'd like to give you ZFS v28 for testing. If you are neither brave nor
mad, you can stop here.
The patchset is very experimental. It can eat your cookie and hurt your
teddy bear, so be warned. Don't try it for anything except testing.
This patchset is also a message we, as the FreeBSD pro
36 matches
Mail list logo
