Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-25 Thread Michael Butler
On 04/19/10 02:30, Alexander Motin wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 18 Apr 2010, at 14:05, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> Most of AHCI controllers could also work as usual PCI ATA, but not every >>> PCI ATA could work as AHCI. It would be nice to compare `pciconf -lvbc` >>> output in both working (Rui)

Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-19 Thread Rui Paulo
On 19 Apr 2010, at 07:30, Alexander Motin wrote: Rui Paulo wrote: On 18 Apr 2010, at 14:05, Alexander Motin wrote: Most of AHCI controllers could also work as usual PCI ATA, but not every PCI ATA could work as AHCI. It would be nice to compare `pciconf - lvbc` output in both working (Rui)

Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-18 Thread Alexander Motin
Rui Paulo wrote: > On 18 Apr 2010, at 14:05, Alexander Motin wrote: >> Most of AHCI controllers could also work as usual PCI ATA, but not every >> PCI ATA could work as AHCI. It would be nice to compare `pciconf -lvbc` >> output in both working (Rui) and not working (Michael) cases. > > ah...@pci0

Re: Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-18 Thread Rui Paulo
On 18 Apr 2010, at 14:05, Alexander Motin wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 18 Apr 2010, at 06:57, Alexander Motin wrote: >>> Rui Paulo wrote: On 17 Apr 2010, at 23:12, Michael Butler wrote: > On 04/17/10 18:05, Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: >>

Re: SPOOFED: Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-18 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/18/10 01:57, Alexander Motin wrote: > More important probably would be `pciconf -lvcb`. > > Intel controllers after ICH6 change both ID and set of resources, > depending on AHCI enabled in BIOS. There is separate set of IDs for > controllers wit

Re: SPOOFED: Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-18 Thread Alexander Motin
Rui Paulo wrote: > On 18 Apr 2010, at 06:57, Alexander Motin wrote: >> Rui Paulo wrote: >>> On 17 Apr 2010, at 23:12, Michael Butler wrote: On 04/17/10 18:05, Rui Paulo wrote: > On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: >> The revision labeled: >> >> SVN rev 206755 on 201

Re: SPOOFED: Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-18 Thread Rui Paulo
On 18 Apr 2010, at 06:57, Alexander Motin wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 17 Apr 2010, at 23:12, Michael Butler wrote: >>> On 04/17/10 18:05, Rui Paulo wrote: On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: > The revision labeled: > > SVN rev 206755 on 2010-04-17 11:40:39Z by rpa

Re: SPOOFED: Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Alexander Motin
Rui Paulo wrote: > On 17 Apr 2010, at 23:12, Michael Butler wrote: >> On 04/17/10 18:05, Rui Paulo wrote: >>> On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: The revision labeled: SVN rev 206755 on 2010-04-17 11:40:39Z by rpaulo Add another ICH7M chipset that works. >>

Re: SPOOFED: Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Rui Paulo
On 17 Apr 2010, at 23:12, Michael Butler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 04/17/10 18:05, Rui Paulo wrote: >> On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> The revision labeled: >>> >>> SVN rev 2

Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Rui Paulo
On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > The revision labeled: > > SVN rev 206755 on 2010-04-17 11:40:39Z by rpaulo > > Add another ICH7M chipset that works. > > .. is incorrect and will cause some laptops to not boot. So, in AHCI

Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/17/10 18:05, Rui Paulo wrote: > On 17 Apr 2010, at 22:34, Michael Butler wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> The revision labeled: >> >> SVN rev 206755 on 2010-04-17 11:40:39Z by rpaulo >> >> Add another ICH7M chi

Re: SVN rev 206755 breakage

2010-04-17 Thread Doug Barton
It's generally also a good idea to cc the author of the change just in case they don't get to their -current mail in a timely manner. hth, Doug -- ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. -- Propellerheads Improve the effectiveness of you