Re: GitHub Code Search

2023-02-05 Thread Daniel O'Connor
> On 4 Feb 2023, at 22:08, Graham Perrin wrote: > > On 31/01/2023 17:47, David Chisnall wrote: >> 𣀦… The old GitHub search is not great, but cs.github.com has replaced local >> search for me in the FreeBSD tree. It's not *quite* as good as fxr, but it's >> close. >> >> For example, searchi

Re: GitHub Code Search

2023-02-04 Thread Graham Perrin
On 31/01/2023 17:47, David Chisnall wrote: 𣀦… The old GitHub search is not great, but cs.github.com has replaced local search for me in the FreeBSD tree. It's not *quite* as good as fxr, but it's close. For example, searching for sys_cap_enter: https://cs.github.com/?scopeName=All+repos&scop

Re: GitHub Code Search [Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience]

2023-02-01 Thread David Chisnall
On 01/02/2023 06:05, Yetoo wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2023, 9:47 AM David Chisnall wrote: On 30/01/2023 21:39, Yetoo wrote: If github is going to be considered for issue tracking I just want to say, after having extensively using it for issue tracking, it tends to be difficult to find an issue if

Re: GitHub Code Search [Re: Tooling Integration and Developer Experience]

2023-01-31 Thread Yetoo
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023, 9:47 AM David Chisnall wrote: > > On 30/01/2023 21:39, Yetoo wrote: > > > > If github is going to be considered for issue tracking I just want to > > say, after having extensively using it for issue tracking, it tends to > > be difficult to find an issue if the exact title is