Re: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-12 Thread phk
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Geof frey T. Falk" writes: >Further to my previous message on encrypting swap: >In order for it to work, apparently, one must change the fstype within >the disklabel, so that the swap partition (e.g. /dev/ad0s1b) is fstype >"4.2BSD", not "swap". This shouldn't be n

Re: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-12 Thread Geoffrey T. Falk
Further to my previous message on encrypting swap: In order for it to work, apparently, one must change the fstype within the disklabel, so that the swap partition (e.g. /dev/ad0s1b) is fstype "4.2BSD", not "swap". At least, I had to do that before it would work. Geoffrey To Unsubscribe: send

Re: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-11 Thread Doug Barton
This is good stuff Geoffrey we may just "borrow" it. :) I know you'ved saved me some work personally, as playing with gdbe is high on my list of things to do. Doug On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, Geoffrey T. Falk wrote: > For encrypting swap, try this: > > > --- etc/rc.d/Makefile 22 Dec 2002 22:25:

Re: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-11 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I am about to set up a FreeBSD 5.0 machine without a swap partition. The > > server has 1GB of RAM. Are there any caveats that I need to consider > > during installation or configuration? > > If you're usin

Re: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-11 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 04:22:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christian Brueffer writes: > > >It seems like you can encrypt swap with GBDE, at least that's what one > >item at http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.0R/todo.html says. > >The manpage doesn't mention

Re: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-11 Thread Christian Brueffer
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 02:16:45AM -0800, Lucky Green wrote: > Miguel wrote: > > Having no swap will prevent you from getting crashdumps in > > case of panic which, if you run 5.0, is not that unusual. > > Besides these days harddrives cost $1/GB, so why not setup > > the swap partition anyway?

Re: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-11 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 11:08:19 +0100 Miguel Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having no swap will prevent you from getting crashdumps in case of > panic which, if you run 5.0, is not that unusual. What about generating a swap partition on the disk, but _not_ adding it to /etc/fstab. This way you

Re: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-11 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Miguel wrote: > > Having no swap will prevent you from getting crashdumps in > > case of panic which, if you run 5.0, is not that unusual. > > Besides these days harddrives cost $1/GB, so why not setup > > the swap partition anyway? > > I don't want

RE: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-11 Thread Lucky Green
Miguel wrote: > Having no swap will prevent you from getting crashdumps in > case of panic which, if you run 5.0, is not that unusual. > Besides these days harddrives cost $1/GB, so why not setup > the swap partition anyway? I don't want cleartext cryptographic keys to ever touch magnetic media

Re: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-11 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I am about to set up a FreeBSD 5.0 machine without a swap partition. The > server has 1GB of RAM. Are there any caveats that I need to consider > during installation or configuration? If you're using sysinstall, it might insist that you have swap. Then

Re: 5.0 without swap

2003-01-11 Thread Miguel Mendez
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:58:31 -0800 "Lucky Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I am about to set up a FreeBSD 5.0 machine without a swap partition. > The server has 1GB of RAM. Are there any caveats that I need to > consider during installation or configuration? Having no swap will prevent y