On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
> awkward. In particular, especially for people who
> have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
We aren't trying to be compatable with SysV. We are compatable with
other BSD's wi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 02:23:48PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Gordon Tetlow wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >
> >>I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
> >>awkward. In particular, ... "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop" does
> >>not actually stop the nfs
Gordon Tetlow wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
awkward. In particular, ... "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop" does
not actually stop the nfsd process. ...
... I've found this behavior to be quite annoying. I'll
see if I
Gordon Tetlow writes:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> > I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
> > awkward. In particular, especially for people who
> > have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
> > rather surprising that "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop"
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:50:45AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
> awkward. In particular, especially for people who
> have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
> rather surprising that "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop" does
> not actually stop the nfsd pro
I find the standard arguments used by RCng quite
awkward. In particular, especially for people who
have worked with SysV-style init scripts, it's
rather surprising that "/etc/rc.d/nfsd stop" does
not actually stop the nfsd process. Likewise, 'start'
doesn't actually start the specified system.
I
