On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >> >@@ -1016,7 +1019,10 @@
> >> > flags |= SHORTINT;
> >> > goto rflag;
> >> > case 'l':
> >> >- flags |= LONGINT;
> >> >+ if (flags & LONGINT)
> >> >+ flags
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >> >@@ -1016,7 +1019,10 @@
> >> > flags |= SHORTINT;
> >> > goto rflag;
> >> > case 'l':
> >> >- flags |= LONGINT;
> >> >+ if (flags & LONGINT)
> >> >+ flags
>> >@@ -1016,7 +1019,10 @@
>> >flags |= SHORTINT;
>> >goto rflag;
>> >case 'l':
>> >- flags |= LONGINT;
>> >+ if (flags & LONGINT)
>> >+ flags |= QUADINT;
>> >+ else
>
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >I want to make this change to printf so that it treats format codes like
> >'%llx' as 64bit formats (i.e. the same as '%qx'). This convention is the
> >same as that used by glibc.
>
> %llx is actually for unsigned long longs, and %qx is actually for
>
>I want to make this change to printf so that it treats format codes like
>'%llx' as 64bit formats (i.e. the same as '%qx'). This convention is the
>same as that used by glibc.
%llx is actually for unsigned long longs, and %qx is actually for
u_quad_t's. These types are different for FreeBSD on
I want to make this change to printf so that it treats format codes like
'%llx' as 64bit formats (i.e. the same as '%qx'). This convention is the
same as that used by glibc.
I needed this change to make an i386->alpha cross debugger which worked
properly but I think that it is a good idea to be c
