>> >@@ -1016,7 +1019,10 @@ >> > flags |= SHORTINT; >> > goto rflag; >> > case 'l': >> >- flags |= LONGINT; >> >+ if (flags & LONGINT) >> >+ flags |= QUADINT; >> >+ else >> >+ flags |= LONGINT; >> > goto rflag; >> > case 'q': >> > flags |= QUADINT; >> >> This assumes that long longs have the same representation as quad_t's. >> I suppose not doing a global change from quad_t to long long is best, >> because the change should actually be to C9x's intmax_t to support C9x's >> %m formats. > >So is the patch correct enough to commit then?
Yes. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
