In message: <1037904653.74226.21.camel@lobo>
Ryan Sommers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Is the kernel on the 5.0SP2 ISO built with PCCard support?
Yes.
: I installed
: from CD-ROM onto a Compaq laptop only to notice nothing about the PCMCIA
: Ethernet card I had in the dmesg output.
I got this back so I will try resending/asking it.
-Forwarded Message-
> From: Ryan Sommers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Compiling -CURRENT and PCMCIA support.
> Date: 21 Nov 2002 12:50:53 -0600
>
> ?On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 22:13, Ry
?On Tue, 2002-11-19 at 22:13, Ryan Sommers wrote:
> My question is could I keep and build the CURRENT source tree on the
> FreeBSD desktop, mount it over NFS to the laptop, and install it over
> the NFS mount?
Is the kernel on the 5.0SP2 ISO built with PCCard support? I installed
from CD-ROM onto
Thanks. End of discussion. If I am able to tidy up parts of PAO I will do
just that.
-Kip
On Sun, 30 May 1999, Joe Abley wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 11:59:35PM -0700, k...@lyris.com wrote:
> > That is the kind of response I like. I don't appreciate being fl
On Sat, May 29, 1999 at 11:59:35PM -0700, k...@lyris.com wrote:
> That is the kind of response I like. I don't appreciate being flamed for a
> reasonable question about something that is not documented in an obvious
> place.
Check the archives for freebsd-current, freebsd-hackers and freebsd-mobil
That is the kind of response I like. I don't appreciate being flamed for a
reasonable question about something that is not documented in an obvious
place.
Is it something that I can help with? Or is it more a political issue? Can
you send me a pointer to something that goes into more detail?
I wil
In message , k...@lyris.com write
s:
>Why can't the PAO changes be committed to the main source tree?
Because they are, technically speaking, a messy hack.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
p...@freebsd.org "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD
> Why can't the PAO changes be committed to the main source tree? It would
> be nice if I could just install the latest version of FreeBSD from
> the Walnut Creek CD-ROM as is and have PCMCIA and APM support on my
Yes, it would be nice. To make a long story short (and emotionless)
there are integ
y and received a disappointingly emotional and
uninformative response.
On Sat, 29 May 1999, Doug White wrote:
> On Sat, 29 May 1999, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
>
> > I'm still at 3.2; however, I wonder what plans there are (if any) to have
> > pcmcia
> > support in 4.x (li
On Sat, 29 May 1999, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
> I'm still at 3.2; however, I wonder what plans there are (if any) to have
> pcmcia
> support in 4.x (like the 3com 3c574, etc). Might be a good idea to include
> a pcmcia floppy in the installation media (like Linux already has).
I'm still at 3.2; however, I wonder what plans there are (if any) to have
pcmcia
support in 4.x (like the 3com 3c574, etc). Might be a good idea to include
a pcmcia floppy in the installation media (like Linux already has).
Thanks.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
