> > From: Michael Harnois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:31 AM
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 05:02:59 -0800, Mike Smith
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > > I'll keep working on this one; things will go a lot faster if I
> > > can get my hands on a sy
> From: Michael Harnois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:31 AM
>
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 05:02:59 -0800, Mike Smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I'll keep working on this one; things will go a lot faster if I
> > can get my hands on a system that misbeh
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000 05:02:59 -0800, Mike Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I'll keep working on this one; things will go a lot faster if I
> can get my hands on a system that misbehaves in a corresponding
> fashion.
You're welcome to come to Iowa and use mine. I'll even put you up.
> I cvsuped current ~2000/12/11 @ ~ 22:00, the previous version was
> from around 2000/12/07. Before the update my Dual intel nic was
> happy post update the nic isn't even probed.
>
> attached is a pciconf -v -l from before and after as well as a
> a boot -v from after. If you need m
> I cvsuped current ~2000/12/11 @ ~ 22:00, the previous version was
> from around 2000/12/07. Before the update my Dual intel nic was
> happy post update the nic isn't even probed.
Hrm. That's odd; I have one of those here (with a Compaq label on it) as
part of my test set. In fact,
I cvsuped current ~2000/12/11 @ ~ 22:00, the previous version was
from around 2000/12/07. Before the update my Dual intel nic was
happy post update the nic isn't even probed.
attached is a pciconf -v -l from before and after as well as a
a boot -v from after. If you need more info let
