On Thu, 29 May 2003, Andrea Campi wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:06:50PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > I have committed changes to nsalloc.c and dsmethod.c. Please cvsup and
> > test ACPI, especially if you had problems with it (that were not present
> > before 0228 was imported).
>
> I updat
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:06:50PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> I have committed changes to nsalloc.c and dsmethod.c. Please cvsup and
> test ACPI, especially if you had problems with it (that were not present
> before 0228 was imported).
I updated and as expected my problems (that were not presen
On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with
> > some appropriate option.
>
> Thank you for the patch. Since we are only days away from a release, I
> would like to avoid using the new dynamic
L PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [acpi-jp 2279] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree
>
> On Thu, 29 May 2003, Takayoshi Kochi wrote:
> > I'm still studying the reason why the TABLE_ID_DSDT is removed
> > in recent ACPI CA, but at least you
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Anish Mistry wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 May 2003 07:58 pm, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote:
> > > After this update, I found some error messages like this:
> > >
> > > acpi0: on motherboard
> > > ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [\\_OS_] i
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Takayoshi Kochi wrote:
> I'm still studying the reason why the TABLE_ID_DSDT is removed
> in recent ACPI CA, but at least you should remove all TABLE_ID_DSDT's,
> I think.
>
> Also, ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID should be larger than 0,
> otherwise 0 may be allocated to running method a
From: Takayoshi Kochi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [acpi-jp 2274] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree
>
> Hi,
>
> From: Nate Lawson <
From: Takayoshi Kochi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2267] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 01:23:49 +0900 (JST)
> Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with
> some appropriate option.
Oops, I attached a wrong one. Pleas
Hi,
From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [acpi-jp 2267] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 16:58:59 -0700
> On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote:
> > After this update, I found some error messages like this:
> >
>
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:27PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote:
> > > After this update, I found some error messages like this:
> > >
> > > acpi0: on motherboard
> > > ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [\
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 07:58 pm, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote:
> > After this update, I found some error messages like this:
> >
> > acpi0: on motherboard
> > ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [\\_OS_] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND
> > ACPI-1287: *** Erro
Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2269] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree,
On Tue, 27 May 2003 17:56:47 -0700 (PDT), Nate Lawson wrote:
> Please respond to my other email as well. Without that patch, do you have
> problems or is it just the error message?
Oh, sorry. Without that patch, no problems
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote:
> Subject: Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree,
> > Please try the attached patch and see if it changes things for you.
>
> OK. I tried youre patch. Error messages is gone :-) Thanks !
Please respond to my other email as well. Wit
Subject: Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree,
> Please try the attached patch and see if it changes things for you.
OK. I tried youre patch. Error messages is gone :-) Thanks !
acpi0: on motherboard
pcibios: BIOS version 2.10
Using $PIR table, 7 entries at 0xc00fdee0
acpi0: power button
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote:
> > After this update, I found some error messages like this:
> >
> > acpi0: on motherboard
> > ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [\\_OS_] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND
> > ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method ex
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote:
> After this update, I found some error messages like this:
>
> acpi0: on motherboard
> ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [\\_OS_] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND
> ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0._INI] (Node
> 0xc21b73e
Subject: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree,
On Tue, 27 May 2003 14:06:50 -0700 (PDT), Nate Lawson wrote:
> I have committed changes to nsalloc.c and dsmethod.c. Please cvsup and
> test ACPI, especially if you had problems with it (that were not present
> before 0228 was imported).
A
I have committed changes to nsalloc.c and dsmethod.c. Please cvsup and
test ACPI, especially if you had problems with it (that were not present
before 0228 was imported).
Commit message follows:
Fix false AE_NOT_FOUND messages, reported in NetBSD port-i386/20897.
NetBSD dsmethod.c rev 1.7
Fix pa
18 matches
Mail list logo
