Here's what we released: #define ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID 0x0001 #define ACPI_FIRST_TABLE_ID 0xF000
> -----Original Message----- > From: Nate Lawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 11:00 AM > To: Takayoshi Kochi > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [acpi-jp 2279] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree > > On Thu, 29 May 2003, Takayoshi Kochi wrote: > > I'm still studying the reason why the TABLE_ID_DSDT is removed > > in recent ACPI CA, but at least you should remove all TABLE_ID_DSDT's, > > I think. > > > > Also, ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID should be larger than 0, > > otherwise 0 may be allocated to running method and make a conflict. > > > > I've made a diff against NetBSD-current and just booted the kernel, > > but haven't tested much (and still trying to make out what the > > changes are intended). > > > > Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with > > some appropriate option. > > Thank you for the patch. Since we are only days away from a release, I > would like to avoid using the new dynamic ID allocation code and instead > stick to hard-coding the defaults. This is the safer way for 5.1R. We > will do a new import and more fixes after the release. > > -Nate _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
