Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > How about create -testing mail list, and start searching for any kind of > volunteers? > I could lend a hand in creating auto-testing some aspects of FreeBSD (at > leas successful booting/working net/route etc), > someone else probably

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
How about create -testing mail list, and start searching for any kind of volunteers? I could lend a hand in creating auto-testing some aspects of FreeBSD (at leas successful booting/working net/route etc), someone else probably could have to say something too. I think resources are there, they ju

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2013-02-21 07:04, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > > >Dear All , > > > > > >During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . > > >... > > > > This in general is a good suggestion. Mo

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2013-02-21 07:04, Matthew Jacob wrote: > On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >Dear All , > > > >During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . > >... > > This in general is a good suggestion. Most companies do such > automated testing as a matter of course. > > Note

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > >> Decent testing system is a pretty complex system to be. >> I spent some time in this area, and gave it up, at least till better times >> :) >> >> But anyway, at least boo

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > Decent testing system is a pretty complex system to be. > I spent some time in this area, and gave it up, at least till better times > :) > > But anyway, at least booting/working network stack/firewall could be > easily tested with VMs.

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Matthew Jacob wrote: > On 2/21/2013 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: > >> There just need to be a person dedicated to this, which is lacking now. >> >> >> That is correct insofar as it goes. That's why we're not all terribly > interested in suggestions about wh

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 2/21/2013 7:32 AM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: There just need to be a person dedicated to this, which is lacking now. That is correct insofar as it goes. That's why we're not all terribly interested in suggestions about what *could* be done- just what somebody is doing. ___

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Fleuriot Damien wrote: > > On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk < > m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Daniel Kalchev > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >> > >>> Dear All

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
Decent testing system is a pretty complex system to be. I spent some time in this area, and gave it up, at least till better times :) But anyway, at least booting/working network stack/firewall could be easily tested with VMs. There just need to be a person dedicated to this, which is lacking now.

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Matthew Jacob wrote: > On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >> Dear All , >> >> During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . >> ... >> > > This in general is a good suggestion. Most companies do such automated > testing as a matter of co

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Fleuriot Damien
On Feb 21, 2013, at 2:23 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > >> >> >> On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: >> >>> Dear All , >>> >>> During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . >>> >>> To my knowledge ( which

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 2/21/2013 5:04 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . ... This in general is a good suggestion. Most companies do such automated testing as a matter of course. Note however that this is a volunteer effort. Were you volunteering

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > > > On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > >> Dear All , >> >> During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . >> >> To my knowledge ( which may not be correct ) , at present , >> Tinderbox is used to only compilation cor

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

2013-02-21 Thread Daniel Kalchev
On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . To my knowledge ( which may not be correct ) , at present , Tinderbox is used to only compilation correctness , means "Syntax" is tested . I have downloaded ftp://ftp.freebsd.o