Re: Another pmap related panic

2003-08-26 Thread Mark Tinguely
Thank-you, The fact that pmap_pte_quick() panics on the untrue mutex should indicate that it is possible that 2 processors may enter pmap_pte_quick() at the same time and therefore it is possible to have the one processor invalidate the VA/PA mapping using PADDR1/PMAP1. If that is true then the fi

Re: Another pmap related panic

2003-08-26 Thread Alan L. Cox
Mark Tinguely wrote: > > It could be a memory problem. Could you also please apply an assert > to pmap_enter_quick() + INVARIANTS. This is a quick test that checks > all the other paths that call pmap_enter_quick() are locked out so > that two processors cannot be using the PADDR1/PMAP1 at the sam

Re: Another pmap related panic

2003-08-26 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > MY APOLOGIES, I am s embarrassed. > > I should have placed that in pmap_pte_quick(), not pmap_enter_quick(). This one panics, too, right at boot time. regards, le -- Lukas Ertl eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX Systemadm

Re: Another pmap related panic

2003-08-26 Thread Mark Tinguely
MY APOLOGIES, I am s embarrassed. I should have placed that in pmap_pte_quick(), not pmap_enter_quick(). --Mark Tinguely [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsub

Re: Another pmap related panic

2003-08-26 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Mark Tinguely wrote: > It could be a memory problem. Could you also please apply an assert > to pmap_enter_quick() + INVARIANTS. This is a quick test that checks > all the other paths that call pmap_enter_quick() are locked out so > that two processors cannot be using the PADD

Re: Another pmap related panic

2003-08-26 Thread Mark Tinguely
It could be a memory problem. Could you also please apply an assert to pmap_enter_quick() + INVARIANTS. This is a quick test that checks all the other paths that call pmap_enter_quick() are locked out so that two processors cannot be using the PADDR1/PMAP1 at the same time. --- pmap.c.orig Mon Aug

Re: Another pmap related panic

2003-08-26 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > > > I got another pmap related panic on my HTT SMP machine. If I don't get > > that completely wrong, it dies again after accessing the return value of > > pmap_pte_quick(). > > I haven't buried myself in

Another pmap related panic

2003-08-22 Thread Lukas Ertl
Hi, I got another pmap related panic on my HTT SMP machine. If I don't get that completely wrong, it dies again after accessing the return value of pmap_pte_quick(). Kernel is: 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #23: Thu Aug 21 21:19:53 CEST 2003 NB: the other panic that I saw frequently c