Mark Tinguely wrote: > > It could be a memory problem. Could you also please apply an assert > to pmap_enter_quick() + INVARIANTS. This is a quick test that checks > all the other paths that call pmap_enter_quick() are locked out so > that two processors cannot be using the PADDR1/PMAP1 at the same time. >
Neither of Lukas's panics suggests that PADDR1/PMAP1 is being used. The faulting virtual addresses are fault virtual address = 0xbfca1974 and fault virtual address = 0xbfcadf10 which are within the PTmap, not PADDR1. In other words, pmap_pte_quick() concluded that the given pmap was currently active and therefore the pte was accessible through the mapping that each address space has to its own page table. Regards, Alan _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
